Why are there some gamers out there that are against this option?

Why are there some gamers out there that are against this option?

Other urls found in this thread:

exhentai.org/g/265375/c8726ae6eb/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>people who don't choose girl always

I assume because there's a difference between playable avatar characters, and playable characters that are meant to be a specific gender.

Piss off.

>people who don't choose boy always.

>>>tumblr

Many either don't care or aren't affected either way. Several others are gay men who don't give a shit about women. Finally, a few actually pose good defenses against having the option related to making a better protagonist, but these people usually allow it in some games where it fits.

girl armor fucking sucks in medieval setting games

The only choice is girl because it adds hotness, but modern developers would never give female characters drawbacks like less strength or periods, so mathematically choosing boy is retarded.

It has gotten better though Both genders now have the option to choose "bikini armor" or "full body amor" so ... progression, everyone is equally happy and offended at the same time.

Post pokegrills

Some established male characters that have been male since the 80's/90's don't suddenly need a female option, that's why. Fuck off.
New IPs is a different story...

It changes the game completely from a concept point of view. like Xenoblade Chronicles x had a create a character, but compared to Elma he has no purpose in the story.

In contrast xenoblade on Wii with Shulk, there was no doubt that he was very important, and story was a lot more front and center.

It's the difference between the two "schools of thought" in RPGs. You are either:

A blank slate character in a setting where you're free to make your own "role". You decide your character's appearance, personality and are free to build the story through choices, or;

You're in the shoes of a "set in stone" character and you have to guide him through the plot as it's presented to you. Your "role" has already been written.

If we're dealing with the first case, having player agency is indispensible for developing the role, as it's a direct result of player's imput and choice.
On the seccond case, the character's traits are already determined to some extent and a high level of customization would be impractical, considering it could diverge too severely from your pre-stablished role.

That's why Geralt could never be a woman and pokemon would be shit without its girls.

I cannot find any other way of agreeing with you other than giving you porn


exhentai.org/g/265375/c8726ae6eb/

Okay. Posting.

because they aren't gender binary or some stupid shit like that while the rest of us are going
>well I'm a guy but I like playing as cute girls

...

>game doesn't have bikini armor for males

guaranteed shit

>they aren't gender binary
What do you mean?

Because a choice netween Boy and Girl ( B o y ) is much better.

>not wanting to be a girl

Being comfortable with who you are sounds amazing and I don't know why I can't bring myself to be that way.

If you consistently play as a cute girl, I'm sorry to say but you are probably a cute girl on the inside.

>you are probably a cute girl on the inside
That has no meaning. You're a cute girl only if you're a cute girl. There is no inside different from outside.

I just want to play as a cute girl (male)

What about cute girl (male)?

I wish. It would be easier to deal with than being a ryonafag.

I wish I was a girl so I could suck big black cocks without being called a faggot.

Should just become a girl (husky) then

>being called a faggot
Why is it a problem. You're what you are.

...