Witcher 3

It's all over.

No more adventures for Geralt.

I refuse to believe this. I want more. I NEED more.

;__;

let it go user.

Can't. It felt so empty, jesus christ. I might do an autistic 100% playthrough

Would you even hesitate?

Brace yourself for the movie.
It's coming out in 2017.

What are the odds of it being terrible?
Has there been a good vidya movie yet?

God damn I was hoping there would be an option to tap that

>Brendan Fraser as Geralt

Yes.

Angry Birds,

He's had a trilogy and a bunch of books/other media to himself.
It's time for him to chill.

>Sup Forums's witcher

Yeah okay but for real now. There hasn't, has there? There's not a single video game to movie adaptation that goes above mediocre, and plenty that are way below that.

I'd rather the series just end gracefully than force out a bunch of shitty shovelware titles disappointing fans for decades for easy cash.

I also don't have much faith in any spin offs.
If there was to be one more game it should be a prequel where you play as Vesemir in the 11th century. Nothing to do with Ciri or the days after Geralt.

Ratchet and Clank was pretty true to the game, problem is the game isn't exactly a good movie to watch.

Now that the dust has settled, can we agree that BaW is an unsatisfying follow-up to the 10/10 Hearts of Stone?

>Geralt hits Ghoul for 410.94
>Ghoul hits Geralt for 1476.43
this is so dumb

Start over from the very start again, user. Heck even go through the cringe worthy TV show.

No B&W is great.

nah, Blood and Wine is better gameplay with less story telling.

But you play games to have content to play, which makes Blood and Wine ultimately superior. Walking simulator fags just got BTFO.

>hits geralt

Last time i saw this words were on the gameplay before buying the game.

Get good.

What happens if Syanna doesn't have the ribbon when she meets Dettlaf at Tesha Mutnam?

>Blood and Wine is better gameplay
>implying Hearts of Stone didn't have better boss fights
Any more bullshit you want to throw my way

How do I earn enough money to make this grandmaster armor? Those dimeritium plates are fucking expensive

actually angry birds

>Get good.
xD xD good one m8

>muh boss fights
>had only one "good" boos fight at the house
TW2 fan detected

If you are actually comparing content awkwardly tacked onto the side of Velen with a useless runeforging gimmick and hand holding story driven quests to a well designed zone full of quests, player housing, new gwent cards, and new mutagen slots/mechanics I don't know what to tell you.

Blood and Wine is obviously a better game for gameplay, Hearts of Stone is only "good" the first time you play it, haven't even bothered with it in NG+ because I already know what it is. It has 0 replay value.

I liked it. Not a 10/10 but all the fanservice(regis appearing, references to od'imm, lady of the lake, fantasy land etc etc) carried it where the story lacked this time around.

>mfw the Ghost Horse quest

Holy fuck the keks are out of control. Based Roach

opinions on the Skellige deck?
>hjalmar being weak
>cerys being OP
only complaint, how biased TW3 is in favor of Cerys when Hjalmar is so much more likable in game and in his feats of strength.

Shit with the bears and mushrooms and card that impacts the next round are nice new toys though.

>tfw no more W3

No spies and being vulnerable to Scorch is what kills it for me.

Northern Realms > Nilfgaard > Skellige > Scoia'tael > Monsters

First thought when I saw Birdfu was
"Fuck I need Geralt to hit that right now."
Then it didn't happen and I was sad. Can't wait for the eventual porn

Why was Hearts of Stone so much more interesting than Blood and Wine. B&W is a lot more comfy though.

already hyped for TW4

yeah, it will happen, their investors will see to that

can you imagine that unexpected E3 reveal with the main theme blaring out?

hopefully Geralt shows up as an NPC at least, gotta make that transition to Ciri smooth

I think they will eventually make a TW game with a non-Geralt protagonist. Hell, maybe not even a witcher protagonist.
Conjuration happening all over again in the finale is a good springboard for this shit.

>Hell, maybe not even a witcher protagonist.
Would be pretty cool to explore the Witcher universe as a higher vampire or sorceress

Skellige isn't that vulnerable to scorch since you choose when to turn them into bears

Its actually very well designed. They can't scorch your dudes when they only have a power of 2 or 4. Then at the end of the round BOOM BEARS NIGGER.

I actually like the monsters deck though, so Im pretty experienced with how to not tip your hand too early. If you throw all your best cards out first, yeah you're gonna get scorched.

as for both, just put decoys in your deck so you can re-use other people's spies.

So is the cursed lady seriously the only npc that ends up at your house except your love interest because if so thats really disappointing

>Why was Hearts of Stone so much more interesting than Blood and Wine.

I thought HoS's story was far better than B&W's main one. It had a far clearer and better written antagonist with some very sympathetic characters like Olgierd and Iris. B&W goes from murder mystery which is decent, to lacking focus when you add in Syanna. Not a fan of this attempt at two antagonists when neither of them are fleshed out well. The ending was pretty good though, I have to admit I had some feels when Geralt looks at the camera after you share a drink with Regis. Some of the side content in B&W is alright though and had some good stories.

I thought cd projekt was an S.A.

I didn't like that they spent a significant amount of time convincing you Dettlaf wasn't a bad person and then suddenly he just goes and slaughters the entire city just because Syanna won't/can't show up

Feels like they invalidated everything with that

What a fucking shit ''''game'''''

who gives a shit about a walking/cutscene simulator?

Wait for the Cyberpunk 2077 user.

It will be based mostly on books I guess.

It's better this way as opposed to something being milked to irrelevance.