A delayed game is eventually good, but a bad game is forever bad

>A delayed game is eventually good, but a bad game is forever bad.
>Star Fox Zero was delayed and still turned out to be shit

I hope Miyamoto dies in my lifetime

Banned for violating global rule #2

What kind of deranged human being do you have to be to wish someones death because you didn't like a game they made.

Mooom! user broke out of the psych ward again!

You are asking that in the same place where people celebrate and make fun of someone getting colon cancer?

It's a sort of similar thing to the media. In order to stand out, people post sensationalist sounding overblown shit, they don't necessarily mean.

It is just interesting to watch how Sup Forums breeds degenerates.

Shigeru Miyamoto is 63 years old. How much time does he have left Sup Forums?

That just means it wasn't delayed enough.

To me it's more scary than interesting seeing all these people wanting to see other people die "just because".

>Releases one of the most awaited Nintendo games
>It's complete crap
We all know how Nintendo's "investors" handle failure.

>turned out to be shit
your tastes for videogames are shit

it's not perfect, but it's far from being shit

>still turned out to be shit
But that's just like your opinion man

it wasn't delayed for enough time, but honestly it would ended up being shit even if they had all the time in the universe, it is platinum we are talking about here and they haven't released a good game in quite some time.

Enough to keep running Nintendo into the ground

I only hope it's because their best teams are working on Nier and Scalebound

Oh, please, Platinum has plenty of faults and bad games, but even a developer godsent can't save a game directed by idiots

>We remade Star Fox 64 on 3DS
>Now that the franchise is back in people's minds...
>We remake Star Fox 64 on Wii U again

No fucking sense of logic, it's just playing it so goddamn safe that it feels like it's old already.

>tells people to get cancer and die
>gets cancer himself
It's the irony

>captcha: chemin

Yeaaaaah it's not like that's a commonly used insult around here or anything like that.

It's the hypocrisy.

You mean he will soon get into a car "accident"?

too much

I just played Star For 64 and I can't believe Miyamoto was the producer for that game and the one for Star Fox Zero.

What a colossal unprecedented fuckup Zero was. Every thing that was good in 64 was thrown out the window without so much of a care in the world. Can Miyamoto just fucking retire already? He had dignity with Mario Galaxies games but Jesus, the longer he stays the more his cancer is destroying other franchises. Miyamoto's is one of the problems with Nintendo/Japanese game companies culture; I've no doubt many people in the Paper Mario/Zelda/Metroid/Star Fox divisions knew the problems they were gonna have but their bosses wouldn't let them overwrite their decisions and we got stuck with shit like Other M and Sticker Paper Mario. Why can't he let this shit go and just retire already?

Miyamoto ruins everything.

>He had dignity with Mario Galaxies games
I really wonder why. While trying to replay them, they came off as dull attempts to wow the audience with "ZOMG 3D", those games primely exist to promote 3D, not you having fun.

Star Fox Zero literally improves upon Star Fox 64. I can't see how anyone who liked 64 enough to want to replay it would miss how Zero expands upon the gameplay.

Two decades more at least, maybe even three or four

That's why I feel SMG2 is batter than 1. it just gets trait to the point as far as you jumping into a game much earlier on.

>Iwata died at 55
Life isn't fair.

If that's the case, why is the internet even having this discussion every day.?

Everyone is wrong, and are retard but you, right.

welcome to the human race
the milky way still in your eyes

I don't know about you, but I very rarely see anyone tell another poster to get cancer and die.

It's usually a non-specific "kill yourself".

Maybe Star Fox is just a bad series in general.

The only games that were good were Star Fox and Star Fox 2.

>improves upon a 20 year old game
wew thats so impressive nintendo. it literally only looks and plays slightly better after 20 years. wow we really should be so grateful for this, as grateful as your autistic ass is when they release some shitty sonic cameo on an old smash or mario kart game for you to buy.

Uncivilized but 100% natural.

>why is the internet even having this discussion every day.?

Because it's the internet.

>Shitty, forced motion controls
>An improvement

>reuse all the levels, "story," voice clips, characters, enemies, bosses
>fuck with the controls, branching level mechanics, gameplay style(in certain vehicles), multiplayer

i don't know how you could fuck up so badly. literally the exact opposite of what you do in a sequel

Delays never helped Aonuma.

>your company has shit teams to make intentionally shit games
Wow great business strategy Platinum! Even if Activision's CoD games end up consistantly mediocre, at least their 3 teams are trying to make a great AAA game. I never see them use the excuse "b-b-but that was the shit team! The games made by our A team will be great I p-p-promise!"

They play it safe because 64fags are the biggest fucking babies out there and will bitch about anything. They even bitched about Star Fox 64 3D.

Star Fox Zero was a good game but it just had literally no content. They should have abandoned Project Guard and used those resources to make more levels and a multiplayer mode for Zero.

And the opinion of the majority. But they are indeed just opinions

Safe in all the wrong ways. Nintendo out of touch, if it needs re-mentioning.

Soon...

Can we at least agree the Miamoto needs to retire and every known change he forced into a game over the past few years has made it objectively worse?

>They even bitched about Star Fox 64 3D
Seriously?

They bitched about the voice acting clips not being the same as well as the 3D models.

>Nintendo makes a new Star Fox game
>"This is awful, make it more like Star Fox 64!"

>Nintendo makes a new Star Fox game like 64
>"This is awful, it's too much like Star Fox 64!"

>Nintendo remakes Star Fox 64
>"NOT MUH STAR FOX 64!"

Nintendo can't win with these people.

They just need to make a good game, goym.

This is one of those cases where the majority is wrong and or simply too incompetent to enjoy the game. Most of the complaints are on the controls which gave me no trouble at all.

>Star Fox Adventures
>Star Fox

>I can't see how anyone who liked 64 enough to want to replay it would miss how Zero expands upon the gameplay.

Putting aside the motion controls, which no one likes or asked for, I'm getting real sick of this meme that new = good. Why is something good because it's new? Well how about dog fetus pizza! That's a new idea, so it must be delicious, right?? In that same vein, you could say the Silent Hill pachinko machine offers great new variety to the franchise.

How about we stop concentrating on trying to innovate for innovation's sake and just try to make things good. This is exactly the same problem with Nintendo's hardware today, as well. There is no reason to reinvent the wheel.

miyamoto really isn't that important to the company. at least not anymore. he's basically the gabe newell of nintendo. a meme and figurehead.

fuck up you whiny faggot, I hope you die horrifically too

It's less of Adventures and more of Assault which got so much shit despite being the most unique of the series and actually felt like the series grown.

>Space Dogfights+Ground TPS fast paced action+Extra Gameplay styles+Unique Story

I mean they still blame one character for fucking up the series of when shit gameplay and garbage story ruined it from Command

Summer fags out in full force already

Wat?

Gabe owns Valve, literally what he says goes

The main issue isn't the delays. It's the vision. That saying that he made worked back when they had a good vision for their games. Now they're just out of good ideas and throwing whatever the fuck they think "looks cool" whether it actually operates properly or not. No amount of time is going to fix an idea that was shit from the beginning.

sure seems that way.

yeah, well his word is shit.

Zero was good, just not as good as it could be.

...

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF WHAT DID YOU FUCKING CALL ME?
A FAGGOT?
DO YOU FUCKING KN OW WHAT FAGGOT EVEN MEANS? IT MEANS A HOMOSEXUAL. A FUCKING QUEER. A WHOOPSY. A PRANCING LALA FRUITY BOY. YOU COME HERE, AND CALL ME FUCKING THAT? DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MANY GIGABYTES OF PORNOGRAPHY FEATURING ONLY FUCKING !!!FEMALES!! I HAVE? DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MANY TIMES A DAY I MASTURBATE TO THIS COLLECTION, HOW MANY HOURS I SPEND EXPANDING IT? NO, NO YOU FUCKING DON'T, YOU JUST COME IN HERE AND MAKE A FUCKING JUDGEMENT ON ME LIKE YOu"RE SOME KIND OF JUDGER OF FAGS WHEN I STILL SMELL OF THE SEMEN FROM JACKING IT TO THE PUSSY OF A FUCKING FEMALE THIS BOARD ISN"T FUCKING /GAY/ ALRIGHT IT'S Sup Forums, NEWSFLASH, JAPAN HAS SEX TOO, OTHERWISE JAPAN WOULD NOT EXIST AS A FUCKING COUNTRY WITH PEOPLE IN YOU PREJUDICED PIECE OF SHIT

WHIPE THAT SMILE OFF YOUR FUCKING FACE. I BET I HAVE AT LEAST TEN TIMES THE AMOUNT OF PICTURES OF VAGINA YOU DO, FAGGOT FAG FAG FRUITY WHOOPSY DOO-DOO LAA LAA SCOUT BOY GET THE FUCK OFF MY BOARD

>there are people who will defend what was done to Zoness in Star Fox Zero

I hope Iwata dies in my lifetime.

>A delayed game is eventually good

He must only be talking about Nintendo games, because look at Duke Nukem Forever.

Hell, Half-Life 3 is never going to live up to the wait, if it ever gets made.

>melee
>good

...

>your opinion
>valid

they complained about the voices sounding different despite the game had most of the same VAs from the original, and sounding 15 years older. they even threw a fit and tried to pull the censorship card over Falco's genius line in te remake instead of saying Einstein. Yes, 64fags are THAT autistic

Twilight and Brawl are good, though.

>Putting aside the motion controls, which no one likes
Tell that to Splatoon, fucker.

Celebrities and the rich people are not on our spectrum. May they all burn in hell for their greed and gluttony.

Is there a single Nintendo published Wii U game that wasn't rushed? Possibly 3D World. Everything else through the entire systems lifespan was rushed as fuck. Smash 4, Splatoon, mario kart, NSMB, star fox, why did Nintendo fuck this system up so hard?

Because they rushed shit on the Wii and it sold like hotcakes.

>SS was delayed and it was still shit
>ZU has been delayed for 2 fucking years and it will probably be garbage

yah fuck miyamoto

It was pretty decent. I enjoyed it.

someone who browses Sup Forums

those are all 10/10 games

>A delayed game is eventually good
This isn't true. Look at Duke Nukem Forever, as well as whatever other examples you can think of. There are plenty of examples of games that were delayed, sometimes multiple times, and sometimes for a great amount of time - Yet they still turned out to be shit. If the core concept of a game isn't good, no amount of time spent "perfecting" a fundamentally flawed concept will make it good. There is also such a thing in game development as just trying too hard and not knowing when to stop and knowing when the game is done, and it's time to move on to the next project. Speaking of which, where's F-Zero on the Wii U? Where's Metroid? Where's Kirby Air Ride 2? Maybe they should put Zelda U out already, since it's just gonna be a shitty Skyrim knockoff (tip: Having a big open world isn't genuine exploration, it just creates a big open area where all you do is hold the stick forward and it lessens replay value) and then they can move on to other games people want to see.
>but a bad game is forever bad.
These "bad games" aren't bad. There is a reason some people just liked the DS and / or PSP in gen 7 and avoided home consoles altogether. Devs don't try as hard on their handheld games, and those games benefit greatly from it. When you don't try so hard and you let some things be imperfect, some people actually enjoy those imperfections and will happily play a solid 8/10 game. When devs try too hard, what they end up doing is playtesting too much and making sure everything can be beaten on the first try by low IQ players, so they end up catering to the lowest denominator and oversimplifying the game and making it easier.

Technically, the OP just wished Miyamoto would die in his lifetime, which is stating a fact if you think about it.

OP is going to definitely be alive when Miyamoto kicks it.

>A delayed game is eventually good, but a bad game is forever bad.
>Twilight Princess is Delayed 2 two years
>its still bad

I think what he meant that bad games are bad forever. Even if you delay them. But journalists mistranslated it as wishful thinking

how do we go from this?

>TP
>10/10

Are there really people who believe this?

Making a good game won't help because to 64fags, it's either 64 or it's shit.

to this

Yea tacking on shitty gameplay styles really makes a series grow, I mean just look at Sonic.

you cant fault them for making games that sell better

i really dont see how anyone could have thought making a star fox game in 2016 was a good idea.

>Brawl
>10/10

Even normalFag reviewers panned SSE and tripping, and that aint even half of the shit wrong with Brawl.

>killed Metroid (had the idea that it should become an FPS)
>killed Paper Mario (had the idea that everything people liked about PM should go)
>killed Star Fox (see Zero)

What else is this madman going to ruin?

>star fox zero was bad

>brawl
>10/10

Don't be rediculous

Twilight Princess isn't bad. Stop trying to be edgy.

>And the opinion of the majority
wrong. Most people enjoy this game.

star fox zero was bad

Star Fox Zero is a bad game even if you ignore the fact that it's literally a reboot of 64.

I don't know why they can't just make a game that's mostly Arwing stages.

Once again, everything went to shit in 1995.

It's a pretty good game, actually.

Not with those Landmaster bosses or that chicken walker shit they pulled in the last two stages.

...

Or maybe you're just miserable and joyless.