This is for the players

>this is for the players

Meanwhile Uncharted 4 looks great.... hmmm... wonder who's fault this is.....

>Both images are equally shit.
>One is Jaggy incoherent shit.
>The other is blurry incoherent shit.
>B-boy s-sure s-showed them p-ps4 f-fags.

If that's as good as the Witcher 3 can look on your PC, you probably should give up on PC gaming.

>PS4 vs Xbone
>'PC'

wot

Well one was made explicitly for the ps4 while the other was made for PC then ported I think

uncharted is linear, made by big ass company, with shitload of money,
W3 is Open World, 3rd game in history of CDPR.

Also, B&W looks better besides cutscenes m8.

Daily reminder DF uses a $4000 PC to compare to $300 PS4's.

The fact that they look similar speaks volumes about PC and PC optimization

>uncharted is linear
Direction doesn't dictate quality, stopped reading.

Nah it looks like shit in comparison. Show me a screenshot that looks better than Uncharted 4.
And CDPR is already a big ass AAA company with shitload of money as well.

Needing all that hardware to run a shit game.

with 300 bucks you can run that shit on a pc.

yeah, they did games like
>Witcher 1
>witcher 2
>witcher 3
so you tell me that there is no difference in rendering big ass areas and closed locations?

For the more, Graphics in W3 B&W is top tier, doesnt matter if better or worse that U4. Just enjoy the game instead of shitposting

cya nerds

Oh yeah, souls games look almost no different on PC and console save for some textures and shadows

The main difference is framerate and resolution

also who the fuck would ever spend more than 1000 usd on a PC? I mean unless it was job related

>it's another consolewar-cancer episode

>they only made 3 games, that somehow changes the fact that they're now a giant corporation with hundreds of devs and huge budgets
Most ironic is how they milked the PC audience dry and then sold out to consoles in the third game.

>Graphics in W3 B&W is top tier,

It's not though, the graphical fidelity is pretty subpar from a huge AAA developer who knows how to optimize for PC and the art direction is meek.

It looks interesting I guess but Uncharted 4 is levels head.

Not really. There's plenty of games that look miles better on a $500 pc than on console. PCs also have better resale value, allowing you to upgrade yearly for no cost (which is what I do). I simply sell and rebuild around December. That's when people will be looking to buy an Xmas gift so it's easy to sell. Current specs are an i5 4690k, 32gb DDR4, 400gb SSD (I keep this every build) 2tb HDD, and a 980ti. I sincerely have no complaints, the total build cost was only 540 with coupons. And I'll be upgrading in January for a small profit. I'm not saying pc gaming is superior but to say it's more expensive is outright false considering all factors.

it does dictate graphics and framrate

because PCucks rather pirate games than buy them. Thats why 70% was sold on consoles while only 30 on pc.
Also, they stated that if they did not downgrade graphics to consoles, they would not make W3 game at all because hey would not make money of PC gamers. look it up if dont belivce me

>There's plenty of games that look miles better on a $500 pc than on console.


Stopped reading there. Stop talking shit.

rollin for demi-nigger

>fluid nigger-kin

close enough

>le poor graphics meme

How's that talking shit? PCs have a higher initial cost but look better. You can easily get a ps4 or xbone for 200-250. It's half the cost and still looks great and often times the same as pc. It's not talking shit, I'm just pointing out the facts of the situation.

tell JK that I'm still rolling

>$4000 PC
>picture shows it's $1852

The random figure meme is real

this thread is dumb anyways so why the fuck not

PS4 has an AMD APU structure, which you can use when going exclusive, not so much when you're multiplat.
Also, Uncharted is Sony's biggest franchise, I wouldn't be surprised if Naughty Dog weren't tweaking the game two years in advance.

Not that anyone on this board would know shit about hardware anyway.

>I'm not saying pc gaming is superior but to say it's more expensive is outright false considering all factors.

The paywall to PC will always be higher than consoles, especially if you're trying to match it's performance. Look at this, this is running on a $300 console, how much money do you have to spend in your PC to get a game looking like this? The truth is you need a $700 build because games aren't optimized for PC

>The truth is you need a $700 build because games aren't optimized for PC

If you think a $700 shitbox will be able to run that you're stupid, I'll be honest and say that looks like Very Higher/Ultra settings, you need at least a $15000 PC to get games looking like that.

I'll freely admit consoles have outclassed PC gaming at a superior price point but why undersell that fact? PC gaming is expensive but when consoles struggle to maintain 30fps on these settings, that's where PC's come in and blow you the fuck away.

4K 120fps. You will never, ever know these feels console users.

I identify myself as a homo faggotkin.

The cost is an exaggeration but your basic points are correct. Optimally you can build a PC to play most games at 4k res and max settings or 5-600 if you shop around a little. There's really no need to spend more unless you want to eek out that extra 30% in performance. The gains diminish quickly after that. And like I said, by reselling your pc every year it's easy to make your money back and stay up to date. You can even turn a very small profit eventually. PCs require a greater time dedication while consoles offer a lower initial barrier and are easy to use. There's pros and cons to both but there's no need to lie about pc gaming.

>4690k
>DDR4
Yeah... Sure...

>sandbox
>linear
You just gone full retard.

That was a typo. My mistake, it is ddr3 of course. If you look up my build you'll see my parts cost is accurate however.

>so you tell me that there is no difference in rendering big ass areas and closed locations?
Okay so you really have no interest in a proper argument then? Since you just put words in my mouth and said what I didn't.

But look dude, I've got neither the time nor the energy to teach you game design, why should I give a fuck if you're a laughing stock? And again you gave me no reason to read past that little bullshit "Oh yeah!?" sentence you made up on the spot.

>Optimally you can build a PC to play most games at 4k res and max settings or $5-600 if you shop around a little.

I just don't know what to say about this, I mean are you talking about using second hand parts for every inch of the build or something to that effect?

My PC costed $500 and I'm still using my old 640. Just the cpu, case, ram, mobo and hardware already cost $500 and I cut costs every place I could.

>a photomode shot with blur out the ass at 30 fps

Let's bring you back to reality buddy boy

who the fuck has a $4000 pc?

My current pc cost $800 and that's because I use it for work. Zbrush, photoshop, sketchup, whatever. I doubt most people need 32gigs of ram, 3TB storage and a 500gig SSD.

The only thing you should ever truly compare price is the GPU. Even then it's still pretty skewed. You can get a nice gaming pc for $400.

Because that's not at all how PCfags portray PC games?

Show me one nigger that didn't reply with bullshots when told that Skyrim looks like shit.

...

Why the shit does the PC ver look so blurry?

You buy in January when parts are cheapest. For instance, every month I et coupons from newegg of course. But in January, I get coupons for straight up 10% off my cart. Or 20% off all Intel processors or whatever. You buy the discontinued tech like I got ddr3 and a 4690k instead of the latest processor to save money. It's stupid to buy later in the year or to buy the latest and greatest. You get the best bang for your buck buying last year's models. Also go with lesser know but reliable brands for the PSU and HDD. Like HGST or Cougar. They're very reliable and much cheaper. Also get a cheap case, there's no reason to spend more than 50 on a case or to buy aftermarket cooling. Just run things at reference on air and you're not going to have issues. Parts are made to operate very comfortably at 40-50c. Any less doesn't really matter.

All of these look fine though...
The fuck are you faggots even arguing any more?

>PCs are more powerful than consoles
News at 11. This isn't even a shitposting or argumentative topic.

My PC is weaker than a PS4 ::;;;;;;^^))))

Exhibit A

I stopped playing Witcher because Phantom Pain released back in September. Getting back to it on PS4, the game runs terrible, and the controls aren't good.

Hey, no one said they shouldn't downgrade for consoles. The problem is when they decided to downgrade the PC versions to their level as well.

>official screenshot
>still looks like shit with horrible textures in the distance
>runs like shit on most PCs
You just proved his point.

Thanks for the advice, I still don't think you can build a 4k-capable PC for that price point but its good to know when its cheaper to buy PC parts.

You can always go and take a direct screenshot and prove me wrong. I can tell it's photomode by the amount of sharpening used on it

I don't like insulting PS4 owners. My mother told me to not make fun of people for being poor.

The impressive thing about ARMA is the fact it draws those things at all, not necessarily the fidelity of them.

You just did

Hm looks like that guy was shitposting another thread and a mod nuked his posts

Go figure what a surprise. He'll prob reset his ip and be back here sooner or later like the autist he is.

>teach you game design
if you honestly think open-world games have no effect on graphics you have no idea what you're talking about.

The largest issue(among many) are man hours. Larger environments take more time to put together. Like in this screenshot they didn't have to make that 3d skybox anymore detailed than what it is. If it was an open world game they would have to.

Therefore, linear games are easier to make pretty. You also have to deal with technical limitations of memory since open world games just have more shit in them. And no, streaming doesn't work the way you think it does.

that looks like fucking shit. kek ast those textures. kek at those jaggies. kek at that DOF. kek

heres a console screen

Who cares about price bro? Just save up, it's not like your parents are paying for it, right?

No one wants to play a clunky milsim

lol what

this

test

>I can tell it's photomode by the amount of sharpening used on it

Why would anyone use sharpening on their pictures? Also I thought PC gaming was 10 times superior in graphics?

Where are the superior games with superior graphics?

Why do you have an uncharted 4 shitposting folder?

>:^)

ROllinghhh

I'm confused as to what I'm supposed to be seeing? They both look like shit.

>Optimally you can build a PC to play most games at 4k res and max settings or 5-600 if you shop around a little.

Quadruple that price if you live in Canada or Australia.

PS4 looks better than the PC version. It's the difference between computer hardware and gaming hardware.

Do I need to post my max settings PC screenshots?

>>horrible textures in the distance

>Textures that are about a quarter mile away don't look immaculate enough

Sheeit, siq burn my man

seems like 2.5million people disagree with you
and on avereage they get about 150 hours of gametime out of it too

Rolling this shit

...

That looks like shit, post more though

>making shitty excuses about blurry distance textures
I thought PCfags had high standards.

this is the power of PC, huh...

meant for

Rolling as well desu senpai

...

Or maybe if speaks a single sentence about the game.