3 > 1 > 2

3 > 1 > 2

Return of the King, while still good, is easily the worst of the 3.
1 > 2 > 3 or 2 > 1 > 3 are the only acceptable orders.

Wrong board but 1 > 2 > 3

>that chick with the dark hair is on 3 of the official posters
>Gimli and Legolas are only on 2

This

3 has a lot of problems, only children like it best because muh ebig battles.

Oh shit, I had two tabs open, one on Sup Forums and one on Sup Forums and posted this on the wrong one.

Since this is Sup Forums though:

>this is objectively the best LOTR video game of all time

The first one might be my favorite just for the atmosphere and quieter moments, but I still really liked how Sam and Frodo's part of the finale was told.

That final mountain climb and that last cathartic rush into battle from everyone else.

Considering that it was film-based game, Return of the King was far better than it had any right to be.

Played it recently.
I remembered it fondly but it actually aged like piss.
>have to spam parry to "block"
>no checkpoint, run out of lives and you have to restart the whole level
>also btw you only have 1 extra life :^)
>and you can't skip cutscene so have fun watching the same shit over and over
>enemies can stunlock you

They were all great, each has their own strengths. The first one has wonderful atmosphere and worldbuilding, the second one amps the tension up to 11 and the third one concludes the story perfectly

1 > 2 > 3

I've since come to appreciate 3 more though, but I was not impressed with it when I first saw the theatrical

forget the eagles, the green ghost army might as well have finished the entirety of Mordor if Aragorn got over himself and contacted them soon after the fellowship was formed

I think the worst offense was cutting out all of Christopher Lee's scenes after they were already filmed.

1 is the best because it actually has exposition.

if you don't know what exposition is why bother using the word?

it sucked (mostly for Lee), but as far as I'm concerned, the extended edits are the definitive versions

Maybe exposition is the wrong word since the sequels have it in some ways, I just like the origin of stories, set-up, and background information. The Two Towers is especially bad at this, but I guess if by exposition you mean slowly building up to the climax all three films include that.

The Witcher > LoTR > GoT

These are the only 3 book series you know?
Sad.

Share yours.

what's the difference between the hobit and the lord of the rings
seriously

Put asoiaf in front and we're good.

I'm not as autistic as you so I don't rank everything.
But if you want to develop your culture on literature here are some great series:
Homeland
The First Law
Discworld
The Wheel of Time
The Earthsea Cycle
Redwall

Also judging from your rankings you obviously haven't read any of these series, probably knew about it as soon as it got an adaptation.

Have you read Warriors. they are the best

The Hobbit was written for a much younger audience than LotR was. Like literally children's/YA tier. It's still very good, just much more simple and shorter.

Don't even bother with the trilogy of films.

Holy shit no
1>2>3 or bust. For both trilogies

>Don't even bother with the trilogy of films.
I thought the first one had a few good moments, letting the characters sing and explore and the like.

Nearly fell asleep watching the next two though.

LotR > ASoIF > The Witcher