The Technomancer

Blunder of the eon

What went wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

au.ign.com/games/mars/pc-14328808
ign.com/articles/2016/06/28/inside-review
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Not sure about the developers shilling here last night, but the studio in charge of publishing it is well known for selling $8 games for real prices.

>last night
I hadn't heard of the game till the thread that's going on right now and this one.

>ign

>4.9 is "Bad"
What the fuck.

It's no wonder these ps4 exclusives never come out.

They're all shit and benefit more from being on those autistic sony nerd lists

This is on PC/Xbone/PS4 you console war faggot

>Standing up for papa sony

Eat shit sonygger. No one wants you here. Go back to neogaf

Shame, looks like it could have been a sleeper hit.

Kill yourself

U mad

...

>Unconvincing characters
Shit, if that's a legitimate problem, you could skewer The Witcher 3.

I saw it on steam. The three videos up there don't show any gameplay at all, neither do the screenshots. Anyone who gets excited for cutscenes is a moron.

>Anyone who gets excited for cutscenes is a moron.

Telltale fanbase.jpg

Is this an honest to goodness AA game in the year 2016? That in and of itself is interesting. I mean, not interesting enough to play the piece of shit, but still, seems like everything is AAA or indie shit these days.

>Studio that made the game only made shit games and one average game
>Latest game is still shit
Anyone actually thought it would be good?

so, its better than god hand?

Some of the trailers looked good,but I expected that

Look mom I said it again!!

>he doesn't like AA games
Sucks to be you. I'll just be over here enjoying this solid 6.5.

better than nothing

But this is the sequel to the average game.

Spiders and Focus Interactive always put out very rough and niche games
Why does this surprise anyone?

Todd posters are shilling hard for their master.

...

> listening to ign

I really enjoyed MWL, but IGN gave it a mediocre score. Haven't bothered listening to anything they've had to say in a long time.

btw, au.ign.com/games/mars/pc-14328808

I bet it's gud and IGN are just faggots again

He's correct, third one had atrocious characters.

DOES THIS GAME HAVE WAIFUS

Like mighty blunder 9, right?

You fucking sucked at school despite what mommy told you.

Same, iwas interest in the technomancer but the review are bipolar.

Story some say it's great other says it's shit
Gameplay some say it's shit others says it's great.

FIrst time i see something like this.

shame,it looked like a fun not so serious RPG with playable Riddick

I'll propably have to wait for the new Pirahna Bytes game

Video game ratings are

4: Unplayable
5: Bad
6: Below par
7: Good enough
8: Very good
9: Pretty damn good
10: Masterpiece

>4.9
>Bad
??????

Unlike mighty, RPGs aren't as dependent on solid gameplay, you can enjoy them for the story progression alone, Planescape is a good example of that.

It got much better reviews on playstation. What gives?

The more recent reviews I've seen from IGN seem to be working on a proper 10 scale.

The 10 scale that reviewers were using before 4 is almost never seen.

That's exactly how most AA games go, you either like them or not. So pirate and see for yourself.

>What gives?
$$$$$

7.5 is average.

kek I was just watching a livestream of it and thought it looked alright

Actually it is
1,2,3,4 not worth getting it for free.propably crashes during the intro
5 -it's shit,but I menaged to beat it OR it is good but indie/japanese/not AAA game
6-It's bugged shit but it's AAA game
7-It is a working AAA game
8-It's a almost fun AAA game
9-It is propably a good game
10-I was given 1000$ to give this game a 10

>dropped witcher 3
>only played Wasteland 2 from the recent iso-rpg resurgence
>completed Mars: War Logs on the highest difficulty
>completed Bound by Flame twice
>will play this
What is wrong with me.

>4: Unplayable
>5: Bad
>6: Below par

What? No. 5-6 are mediocre/flawed games

4-3 are heavily flayed but still playable.

>game by Spiders

Oh jeez, who could have foreseen this. Surely the studio that made such classics as Mars: War Logs and Bound by Flame would made another masterpiece of generic gaming.

>spiders
>having money
Rethink your meme ways.

Focus Entertainment has been publishing shit for a while now.

This. Bummer.

Are you kidding? I spent most of the game wondering why I should help anyone.

Now this is disappointing, I wanted this to be at least decent

>Blunder
>4.9 for a game made by Spiders
Kind of expected, no?

Are we really trusting a website that thought "too much water" is a legit game flaw?

no, they're known for selling $8 games for $8

REMINDER
E
M
I
N
D
E
R

I'll just pirate and check for myself.
Could be a case of Alpha Protocol or something
I liked some of the themes, like Mars is like a poor man's Arrakis

They should start doing that then.

>What went wrong?+ 0 post omitted.

Made by the same guys who did Mars Wars Logs and Bound By Flame, two absolutely shit games.

Not really a surprise that third time wasn't the charm.

REMINDER DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS

it looked fucking terrible
how is ANYBODY here surprised?

those cons.... it's a VN

REMINDER THIS JUST HAPPENED TODAY

10/10
ign.com/articles/2016/06/28/inside-review

Actually this game feels more like a 5.4 than a 4.9 ... Fucking inaccurate reviews

I like the look and the settings. Also it's not bad graphically for a AA game. Unfortunately if the combat and story sucks I can't see why I would bother playing it.

reminder that there are no facial animations

>ARPG
>it's not a clicky lootfest

Shit game. Deserves an even lower score.

I toldya nobody talked about it, can't wait until it's $5, it looks like witcher on mars

It's easily a 5.7, and not a decimal point below, you nigger

10: paid
9.5: overrated shit
9: it's alright
8.5: GOTY
8: GOTY
7.5: underrated
7 and below: shit

>literal fail grade
For some reason video games are marked on a school grading scale rather than an Internet scale where 5 is the mean.

So 7 is meh and everything below is bad.

>Different people have different opinions

HOREY SHIEET!

This game is made by Spiders, a budget Euro RPG developer. All their games get scores like this.

Not everybody's cup of tea, but I like Eurojank.

>same guy gave Alien Isolation a 5.

I do agree with him that the game went on for a bit too long, but its a 7 at the very least, so I doubt Inside is the masterpiece he claims it to be.

Where's the torrent?

game not released yet

>Blunder of the eon
Not really. It's a budget title. Who was expecting much of it in the first place?

From Bound by Flame, I would say that this studio is allergic to fun and fluidity in their design.

Thx, user. I can wait a little longer.

It didn't live up to the first game.

>Tech Romancer
Is it a mech dating sim ?

Ye, galbot on the left is a real tsundere

i enjoyed trying to choose between evils

>REMINDER REVIEWS ARE REPRESENTATIVE OF WEBSITES AS A WHOLE OR THEY WOULDNT ALLOW THEM TO BE PUBLISHED

bound by flame was a chunk of coal that couldve been a diamond with competent devs

Bound by Flame was just unplayable, boring trash.

I don't think there's any question that PR people from the publisher/developer are on here pushing this turd.

I can't even fathom that anyone would be so completely insulated from actual good games that they'd be hyped for this trash.