Games with only 1 good game in the series.
Games with only 1 good game in the series
...
...
...
lol
...
You meant 0
1 was boring. The same shade of brown and green over and over.
3 was alright but still pretty bad.
2 had the most varied locations and mixed action with stealth/puzzles very well. It also had the best start of the entire series. The other ones start off relatively slow and boring.
Something objectively applicable to the thread.
3 was fine
ghostbusters on genesis wasn't half bad.
(You)
this
3 was great senpai I dont know what youre talking about. 1 was good for 2008 but hasn't held up since.
...
Uncharted 2 was just kind of alright. I wouldn't really call it good.
The best part about the uncharted series as a whole is everything but its gameplay.
I like 3 the best purely because of its set pieces and 4 the least for the same reason.
The stealth sections almost made me drop the game
Seriously, fuck those
1 and 3 were better.
...
1 was garbage. Don't even pretend it wasn't. I'm surprised they got to make a second one with how bad the first one was.
Why?
Aside from that one in Shambala, the rest was perfectly fine and easy. You need some help, user?
...
There was one at the start of the game, that's it
>implying
so is this just gonna be a bait thread to search for (you)s?
...
>Games with 0 good game in the series.
FTFY
>someone posts an image without any text so it must be someone just trolling and not that they have their own opinions but don't feel like posting them
...
*tips*
/thread
Even in a bait thread, the truth comes out
It was so utterly unremarkably ordinary that it sold well to people who are afraid of and confused by even slightly fantastic or thought provoking things.
1 bad game in total is neither a series, nor a good game.
But I assume you were trying to making a lame joke.
Vaas is over hyped and the [southern island] feels like a disembodied epilogue but 3 was pretty good.
He's completely right though.
Yeah, or maybe it is very strange to post games that were not alone in being good in their respective series.
He is not, though.
1 was bad, and 3 was worse than 2, but that does not automatically make 2 good in its own right.