What did Sup Forums think of GTA V? Genuinely curious. I playing through it again and i find it is still a total blast. I wish Rockstar gave us the extra story DLC that was hinted at but never mentioned again.
What did Sup Forums think of GTA V? Genuinely curious. I playing through it again and i find it is still a total blast...
It's a little too broad for its own good (there's a lot going on but quite a bit of it feels mundane). Also it feels too realistic at times (like you can't seem to earn any money being a criminal; the only way to really rack up big bills is by playing the stock market).
Fun missions and world, shit story and characters.
It's a pretty good sandbox and thats it.
>Michael
>shit character
Delete yourself.
Story was a mess. Balancing betrayal, wacky light criminal jokes, heists, broken families and gangs was a bit too much.
It was still a lot of fun and provided a shit load of content for a retail game but after RDR and MP3 I expected a lot more.
is that the nigger? you disgust me.
Cop and civilian AI is too realistic, makes the game lose some of the charm the previous games have. Still fun, good world, fun to play every once in a while. Also, it's too hard to earn money being a criminal.
Anyone feel too weird being a sociopath as Franklin or Michael? I can only do it when I'm Trevor.
No you fucking failed abortion that's Franklin
Honestly found it more boring than 4 and Michael was the only character I actually liked.
Bad story, Franklin did fuck all the entire time.
Heists were shit and there were only like 3 proper heists in the game.
Online is fucking garbage.
Singleplayer was good though, some fun missions in there and it's fun in general to just mess around in.
Objectively a 9.5/10
It takes itself too seriously
That was GTA4.
I have a hard time doing it with Franklin, but if you don't see that Michael is the real sociopath you didn't understand the story at all
5 as well. Just look what they did to police response and character damage model. Forget running around blowing up shit and having fun like you did in old GTA games. Stay in cover and pretend you're in a shitty cover shooter or die.
It's kinda interesting how much shit they took from Red Dead Redemption.
los santos was great
the story was shit and the gameplay disappointing
game is shit
>get cucked
>dont kill the guy
>play as le canadiun
>DUDE RANDOM LMAO
>LE ANGRY FACE
>play as a nigger and not CJ
>we wuz grove stree n shiet
>SHIEEET NIGRA every few minutes
one beefy protaganist is better han three thin protaganists
>story is garbage
>last mission is garbage
>checkpoints are a terrible for this franchise
>half of the map is a fucking mountain
>properties are useless, i'd much rather buy houses
>buying masks count as a mission
>too much "so random drugs lmaooo" shit that are not funny
>radio is bad
>heists are underwhelming overall
>switching characters in missions is not very fun
>terrible activities like yoga
It's still a solid game despite all that, good gameplay, tons of details in the city, good voice acting, some very fun missions. I give it a 7.5/10
>get cucked dont kill the guy
Wew 2edgy4me
Yeah. 2 episodic content like gta iv got would have been so sweet. I bet it would sell a lot better than gta iv's dlc did as well since its gta v was actually a good game.
Inb4 retarded nu v faggots claiming that gta iv wasn't anything but an abortion of a boring ass game.
This. Glad rockstar learned from their bullshit.
I thought the story was great, I play exclusively single player anymore and it was just a blast all the way through.
A shallower game than GTA IV despite it's half hearted attempts to bring back stat progression.
A PS360 game through and through, mission setpieces are thouroughly unimpressive. The most glaring example of this I could find was the mission you land a plane inside another plane, and the actual action of entering the plane is relegated to a cutscene.
That's some fucking PS2 shit rockstar, I could handle it in GTA: SA's "Stowaway" mission but not in a day and age where indie games manage to have more impressive, dynamic gameplay setpieces.
>>radio is bad
It baffles me how this has become a common opinion here. Like, if you're talking about the talk show stations, sure, but the PC/8th Gen soundtrack was fantastic.
>someone fucks you wife
>in a game where you kill shitton of cops and civies
>but killing a bull is le bad >:(
>PC/8th Gen soundtrack was fantastic
Maybe that's why I didn't like it, I played on PS3
it's okay
car customization's great
just driving around Los Santos is great
somehow though GTA just isn't captivating to me anymore, so I dropped it halfway through the game
Do you not think that adds to the situation? That a man who's murdered hundreds of people doesn't kill the man who slept with his wife? It's terrific writing
thats just as bad as when your about to kill an evill guy and someone says "if you kill him your're no better than him!"
not killing him shows weakness and you're too forgiving
oy vey
7/10 compared to GTA IV's 8/10
And no, I didn't play IV the most or grow up with it, that honor goes to Vice City and it's my least favorite.
Or it shows that Michael knows his marriage is a disaster and that this isn't the first time he has caught his wife fucking someone.
>not killing him shows weakness and you're too forgiving
If you say so
I'd give 4 and 5 a 9/10 for different reasons.
Calling 4 shit is absurd.
youtube.com
F for Edgar froese
gta 5 shall be his last triumph
>someone FUCKS your wife
>being a beta and letting him live so he can still do it
>strong
>isnt the first time
>hasnt went postal yet
>not weak
?????
It's good writing. Just because you don't understand how adults go about their business. So your saying Michael should have brutally murdered him and then went home to his wife and expected everything to be fine and dandy? What would you have liked Michael to do?
He'll probably say murder them both.
>kill the bull
>go home to wife
>beat the bitch vagina
>divorce
>stop being beta
>start going postal
>heist again
>beat the bitch vagina
>divorce
He's in witness protection. How is that going to work?
Still mad I could not kill Devin directly for not paying for the fucking race cars, instead have to work with him.
>go postal
just kill whoever
I think you mean psychopath
Best part of the entire game
Why do you think his wife hates him so much?
Some time in the last 20 years he caught her and went psycho. Probably killed the dude. She was a stripper he bought fake tots for and married, there's no way this is the first time that happened.
It's just now he's middle aged and has more important shit to worry about. Not to mention the fact that when he found out his wife was fucking the yoga dudes he was reeling from the fact his old best friend who thought be was dead had just found him.
Extremely forgettable. TECHNICALLY it was a great game, but it had no substance at all. I'd rather play through GTA4 again than GTA5.
youtube.com
Post YFW you first saw this commercial.
In my 30 years of gaming, I honestly have never been more hyped to play a game than GTA V. Leading up to release it felt like a worldwide event. Crazy thing is it actually delivered and provided one of the best experiences of the past decade.
Yeah I think the way it played out in the game was more realistic and added to the whole "crook trying to be a family man" thing that the devs were going for. The game would have been pretty shit if it ended at that point with a 5 star man hunt or had basically two Trevors, don't you think?
>kills hundreds as already mentioned
>robs banks etc
>>>hasn't went postal
he just did such a professional job of going postal it didn't even affect his life in any negative sense.
I love v. Best gta with mods
>caring about his whore wife
should have killed her 2bh
>GTA 5
>good experience
>delieverd promises
>past decade
hurts to see someone with lowest expectations
>crook trying to be familyman
>goes back to being a crook
>disregards family
>going postal
>coming back alive
>didnt even nuke a city with all that money he had
???
>Michael pulled down a million dollar house as revenge
>Trevor is more of a psychopath than "LEL RANDOM XDDDD"
>Franklin's entire storyline is about him being a successful pro criminal surrounded by a bunch of gangbanging nigger chimps
4/10 bait, made me reply
Dude the coolest thing about GTA V is that it is a very funny satire, comedy and parody of modern culture. The fucking problem is that no one ask for that.
>Michael pulled down a million dollar house as revenge
That was the tennis coach, he did nothing to the yoga guy
You come off as being too poor to enjoy high profile games so you form your opinion by watching Let's Plays.
He hit him in the face with a laptop and broke his nose.
That's actually really great, I never play the story in any Gta, I have like 700+ hours on Gtav for the online alone.
Gonna play the story right now
>pull down millo house
>wasnt even his
>bull is STILL alive
>psycopath
>no just a lel random angrycanadian with PTSD
>pro criminal
>gangbangs with his boy lamar
>uses shitty equipment
>critique game, give opinion
>DUDE POVERTY LMAO
>DUDE YOU HAVENT PUT IN ENOUGH HOURS
>DIDNT BUY THE DLC???
whats the next tactic?? "dude not supposed to play it THAT way"
pathetic defence
...
Where did I imply he cared for his wife?
In fact it's the opposite. He's probably done this whole routine 10 or more times. Oh shit she's fucking someone, freak oit, kill the dude, deal with fallout.
He's just so apathetic by the time of the game he really doesn't care who shes fucking. In fact it seemed to me the whole reason he was semi mad at all was more "that's mine!" rather than "I love her".
But GTA has been doing that pretty much from GTA 3 onwards. Social satire has always been one of the trademarks of the series.
Michael should have been the sole protagonist, he's interesting enough on his own
>caring about what his wife has to say*
>doesnt care who shes been fucking
he never seemed to care in the first place
Great game. Loading times are insane with the multiplayer and the money grind is brutal + kinda ruined by all the hacking / people buying shark cards
The game is actually genuinely very funny, which is great.
You didn't like the game, we get it. Just please stop using the word "bull". Also not entirely sure what "lel random angrycanadian" is supposed to mean. Could you elaborate?
True man, especially on the radios in the PS2 trilogy, but GTA V is all over your face, just remember that stupid ass LifeInvader mission.
I gave up on the multiplayer long ago. I did try it again after the PC version was released and I was able to get my character imported, but it still didn't hold my interest. I think IV handled online better.
That was Amanda who did that.
>trevor always does random shit
>LE ANGRY SHOUTING
>wants to fuck men
>SMASHING SHIT
>LOUD NOISES
>beats random people
>PTSD
>crossdresser
>auistic
>balding
>does random shit eachtime you switch to him
>not lel so random
i only liked the online with friends blowing shit up, using bike and landing planes in the city and rooftops, SP was boring trash with tonnes of filler
It was all right. Writing was less terrible than other GTA games, although long stretches--Trevor's first arrival in LS, working for the FIB--are really boring filler after the first playthrough. Los Santos didn't feel like LA the way Liberty City got New York in GTA4.
Felt empty and half-assed. Fun game, if you don't think too hard about it.
Also, radio sucked ass.
It's alright. I had fun with it.
Why start the game over if you don't have to? Replaying missions is a thing. You might miss out on the random events, but it's not worth it unless you upgraded to the next-gen version.
> I wish Rockstar gave us the extra story DLC that was hinted at but never mentioned again
They straight up said they were going to make some.
And it's never going to come.
Because of Online, they're focusing on it
hawt
source?
Chuck Jones.
memes aside I found the story really fun. I played through it 3 times. Even though alot of people hate it I really like Online. I still play it every now and then. Heistan, shittan, racan, stuntan, fightan, and so on is fun when you're with friends, hell I even have alot of fun with /gtag/
Yes, the story is really entertaining. Lots of memorable funny moments. People who hates the storyline probably expecting another realistic gloomy drama like IV.
The AI is horrible, along with most other parts of the game.
Lead designers were fired at the beginning of 2016, two of them had been around since gta 3, and the third was the story writer for SA VC and GTA 4. I'm worried the next installment is going to be crap, now that the micro transaction mill has identified GTA as a cash cow now.
No, it isn't. It's lazy as hell.
The only reason he doesn't kill him is because if he does (which would be in character) he would never pull down Madrazo's house and therefore never set up another heist that leads Trevor into finding him out and setting up the story.
If there will be a story DLC who'd be the best main character?
I just hope it won't be Lamar or Lester.