youtube.com
HOW DID THEY DO IT !!???!?!?
youtube.com
HOW DID THEY DO IT !!???!?!?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtube.com
nexusmods.com
twitter.com
>vs PC Original
>PC Original
>vs Original
lel you killed your own thread memer gj
With the official HD texture pack, even the standard PC version has better textures than PS4/Xbone.
What the fuck are you talking about, the left looks much better
Are the mods actually different? Do I have to download the SE mods or can I just transfer shit from original Skyrim?
they didn't implement those into ps4/xb1? Pretty laughable
holy shit the fps is fucking horrible, hurts my eyes a bit.
youtu.be
walking in the nature is boring i dont care about skyrim
Why are they even mentioning PC or PS4 when it's just a comparison between the old version and the new one.
The PS4 version literally has superior audio to the PC and Xbox version because they were forced to use Sony's weird audio codecs.
BTFO
wot
This, OP is full of shit. Maybe blind even.
lmao,that blur for the PS4 is horrible
call me crazy but all they've done is smothered butter over it.
>tfw the standard edition from 2008 doesn't have to hide behind shitty bloom to be good
We're talking about BETHESDA texturing here. Where they use a large texture, UV map an object to only cover 20% of the texture surface and then wonder why people are complaining about blurry shit.
I'd like to remind you all that you're here, giving a fuck about a remaster of a 2011 Bethesda game.
>good
Does the PS4 have a framerate issue or does the player just have Parkinson's cause that was some serious stuttering. Congratulations you've got better textures than we had 5 years ago at a silky smooth 4 fps.
Yeah but we can just use a texture pack FOR FREE
CONSOLES STILL AT 30 FPS
J U S T
>giving a fuck about Skyrim Rememester 2016
kys
>Sup Forums is so shit now that people can't even start competent platform war threads
>kys
Only person here who should kill self is you.
You fucking reddit.
Holy shit.
>solid 30 is horrible
Only in a side by side comparison.
Bethescuck angry? Mad?
But my dude, PS4 can't have mods that use scripts or external assets. Don't encourage people to buy it for PS4 until Sony allows this. If Xbone has it then PS4 should have it too.
>taking the b8
Solid 30 fps is unplayable. 60 fps is the minimum you can play at without feeling extreme shame. For a 5 year old game you should be pulling at least 100.
whatever you say kiddo
Sorry you wasted your life and mummy and daddy's money on an inferior system and an inferior game chum. Maybe next time you should ask your parents for a real gaming machine. Mow a few lawns and they might work with you.
>Bethescuck angry? Mad?
Mad about your reddit retardation? Yes
Kill yourself
>competent
>platform war
You could have just said Sup Forums was always shit.
I play on PC my dude
T. Wagecuck
DELET THIS
Must have a pretty shit PC if you can't get at least 60 fps man.
But I can get 60fps
>PC Original, not the PC Remaster
I'm disgusted that Digital Foundry actually made this video because now we're going to see a bunch of threads about this exact shit and people are gonna get baited by/heavily shitpost about it.
>modded console vs unmodded pc
>PC has no grass while PS4 has literally tall grass everywhere
This is hilarious
I want butter Skyrim pls
fucking digital foundry didnt do a PC vs PC remaster WHAT
>Congratulations you've got better textures
It doesn't though. Open your fucking eyes, or look at The PS4 looks like ass, there is zero detail to any texture.
I can't believe it's not the Butterborn
>namefag can't read
No surprise
Digital Foundry is now a console shilling operation.
this is a blue board
pls
>that 10 fps slideshow on right
Did they even redo the textures for the remaster or what? It literally looks like they've chuck blur and bloom on it while turning up the saturation and adding more grass.
post one about the shadows, my lungs ascended to an astral plane when i saw the shadows on the remaster version.
>PC cucks btfo with inferior audio
Loving every laugh
What would there be to say? They generally look pretty close but PC has drastically higher framerates and a better modding community. Oh and you got it free or at least significantly discounted if you actually owned Skyrim.
A lot of the textures are super shitty. I've noticed going through the game that they look good at a distance but when you get close enough you can see a lot of them are 2d cutouts. It's pretty jarring.
Then i open my heavily modded (over 16Gb of mods) skyrim and it suddenly looks X10 times better than this shit.
Thanks for reminding me that OP.
He's right though, 30 fps is a noticeable drop in quality.
I mean you can play through a good game and still enjoy it, but then it's DESPITE the shitty fps.
Look at this this way, if you had the choice between 30fps and 60fps, you would choose 60fps each time.
DF are pretty hard PS4 shills now. Just look at their Uncharted 4 video, where every positive change is rightfully labelled as an upgrade but every downgrade is "it looks a bit different".
Of course it's noticeably worse, it just isn't horrible or unplayable.
>skyrim
>implying that people will give a fuck about background grafics when those get blurred away by fucking DoF when they take their waifu screenshots anyways
why is remaster so blurry?
Surely I'm not the only one that was watching an average of 18FPS on the PS4 side, right.
Follower when senpai?
is the PS4 fucking REMASTERED version worse than vanilla original PC version? how can anyone on Sup Forums seriously compare their console to the machine that makes video games
>60 fps is the minimum you can play at without feeling extreme shame.
Bullshit. 30 fps is playable. Ugly, but playable. The thing is when 30 fps is the max you can get, as it only means in certain points it could get 20-25fps. That's unplayable.
Sorry user but saying 30fps is unplayable is retarded. You must understand what it really means.
Not that user but 30FPS is tolerable for say strategy games and maybe cinematic 3rd person shooters. But for shit like DMC and fighting games? Hell no. Hell the fuck no.
i have pic related and want to start it but can't find anywhere if the remaster has legendary
>Must have a pretty shit PC if you can't get at least 60 fps man.
My PC gets 100+ fps in a 2008 game on Ultra settings.
The box flat out states it has all 3 DLC.
Learn to read, dumbass.
>Solid 30 fps is unplayable. 60 fps is the minimum you can play at without feeling extreme shame.
25 fps is fine for playing with a controller ten feet away from the screen.
85 fps is minimum for playing with a mouse two feet from the screen.
>25 fps is fine for playing with a controller ten feet away from the screen.
>I play DMC at 25fps
Just what in the FUCK is with that reasoning?
why the remaster looks like Twilight Princess?
Now hold up.
I wear glasses. My eyes are not of top-tier quality, so I might be seeing this wrong, or something, but do people actually think the right rocks look better than the left?
The right just looks like gravel to me, while the left are actual rocks.
This looks objectively worse.
You do realize that mods exist right? console peasants won't get to enjoy DatGrass mod.
I mean I don't understand. This looks far, far worse, doesn't it?
A lot of the textures for the remaster look like shit. The dudes main argument was "hurr, they put more stuff so better." His comparisons were bullshit and the framerate was godawful.
PC looks a lot sharper but the PS4 version has more vegitation
>Literally all they did was upscale the textures, put grass everywhere and add even more fucking blur filters with increased saturation
>""""""""Remastered"""""""""
AAA industry was a mistake.
It's going to sell 3 million minimum and this awful practice will continue. Brb, killing myself.
Textures are the same but shaders are fucked up
I am fucking dying over here. Todd did it again. I hope normal fags gonna buy it.
PC version's dialogue and menus are less clunky, textures are still shitty, +light rays,64 bit (better performance?)
Just port over my mods already.
It's still a shit game so who cares?
Consolefag arguing with another consolefag:
>My console has the best graphics and it can run games at a much higher fps than yours.
>My console has backwards compatibility for games of the last gen, unlike yours.
Consolefag arguing with a PCcuck
>Real gamers don't care about graphics you basement dweller and 30 fps is good enough.
>H-haha he cares about playing 10 year old games, w-what a loser!
yeah, sure does look great
>that framerate
how embarrassing, PS4
>The dudes main argument was "hurr, they put more stuff so better."
But PC also has the remaster, which includes the same huge increase to object on screen.
It's kind of sad when you have to compare your console to a 5 year old PC version and still make little excuses why most of it looks worse BUT THIS ONE THING IS BETTER.
They just fucking look like they turned up the brightness a little.
And what's going on with that fog?
Are they fucking proud of this?
>MORE BLOOM WE NEED MOAR BLOOM
bravo todd
>meanwhile, in modded original Skyrim
what mod organizer should I use again, I heard Nexus' one isn't that good before
My brother bought skyrim today.. full price.. when just last year I bought it and all dlc for $15...
>all this objectively worse looking stuff
>all in glorious 30 fps
I don't understand this industry anymore.
nexusmods.com
Mod Organizer is the best one as of right now.
You should probably hold a pillow over your brother's head. He might one day breed otherwise.
Exactly the same fucking shit but with fucking fog so you can't see the shit clearly.
user, this is called "immersion".
What surprises me is how few people ITT are complaining about that awful frame rate.
Yo hold the fuck up. Does the remaster not run at 60 FPS on PS4?
I can confirm Nexus Mod Manager is not very convenient to use after trying out the Mod Organizer by Tannin.
No, it doesn't.