what are your thoughts on this DLC?
Red Dead Redemption: Undead Nightmare
one of the best DLC's ever.
Nice meme opinion
Rockstar makes better AAA games than anyone else
When will someone else start actually setting the standards?
moron
I have work in 12 hours and need to sleep before it but might put 2 hours into it tonight. Never played
How about stop giving shit opinions and tell us how it was bad. Blood and Wine has been the only other better DLC/expansion that I felt like they put in more effort
One of the few dlc's that I didn't regret getting.
>I have never played Shivering Isles
It was alright
notice said ONE OF, not THE best you fucking autist
Rockstar barley makes games these days, with GTA4 being the start of his trend.
>Blood and Wine has been the only other better DLC/expansion that I felt like they put in more effort
Why don't you tell us why its good/bad instead of giving us shit opinions?
fuck off
YOU
EAT
BABIES
Now you're truly memeing it up
The ps3 version has been unplayably broken for years and rockstar refuse to patch it so I can't share my opinion on the content of this DLC.
Only played it at a friend's but it was pretty okay I guess
sup cancer
zombie parts replacing money and being ammunition for the blunderbuss was neat.
The blunderbuss in general was a fucking cool weapon
>genuninely enjoying the LOL SO RANDUMB DLC
Fucking kill yourself you autistic faggot, pillocks like you are killing gaming by gobbling up that shite.
ye
Yeah, despite being worse than 360 version, the game itself was still very playable on ps3. Dlc, however, is a trainwreck.
>it has cutscenes so it's a movie meme
consider ending your life right away
I liked shivering isles, dawn/duskguard was a good weapon, and I liked that quest where you have to fuck with the treasure hunters by flipping switches.
Knights of the Nine provided my favorite suit of armor though.
I'm playing it right now though... no problems.
i never liked it, not saying it is bad it is just too far away from what they were doing with RDR.
When zombies start spawning without heads, restart, they are invincible
Notice I didn't reply to
I replied to
Learn to use Sup Forums you fucking newfag
>rockstar hasn't made an in-house AAA game in 12 years that didn't receive a 95 or higher metascore
>I think in that span is when they've made their worse games
Goddamn son, you're a fucking edgy contrarian.
I just think it was pretty desu
The gatekeeper quest and things like suicide guy and hill of the dead was mint as fuck
All DLC is bad
Sell a complete game. Get new ideas after launch? Put them in the sequel.
Looks like someone is real desperate for those (you)'s
Oh flower of Scotland...
Feels extremely good.
I thought it was shit, and RDR is one of my favorite games.
That's never going to happen. If you were actually making these games and needed money and profit you'd be doing the same shit.
No, it just has really really shitty nu-gameplay were you have near zero ability to problem solve. These "games" are so scripted beyond belief that interesting missions are few and far between. The game tells you where the go and where to stand 90% of the time. The game will almost NEVER actually let you catch the person your chasing and will speed up the NPC artificially so you can't catch them. The movement system in all the new rockstar games is extremely clunky for the sake of "cinematic gameplay" and any actual gameplay mechanics are ankle deep. RDR gives you 5 rifles that operate almost the exact same way, 5 pistols that operate the exact same way.
Why Sup Forums toes he line with Rockstar games is baffling, it's like you guys can't see that walking/driving and talking is NOT FUCKING FUN, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE.
>rockstar
>sequels
>hurr I hate R*
Tell us a legit better dev team. Don't give me this bullshit "Fromsoft". If they lose Miyazaki they're fucked.
HOT DAMN these some terrible fucking opinions
and to top it of you lie in 70% of this post
kill yourself right away, you parroting scum.
What am I lying about?
This they fuck us up the ass with DLC planning that shit before the game even comes out because they know people will still eat their shit up
shell out 80$ for that new Civ and then a few 20$ for them dlcs
>nu-gameplay
one of the worst posts I've seen in a long time
congrats Sup Forums
Same, was extremely generic apart from the mounts and some supernatural stuff
Even that is overrated, people spout Muh Bigfoot
Also it's a buggy piece of shit
And yet you can't tell me why i'm wrong.
I can. Re-read your post and make sure you're above average intelligence.
Then you'll see why you're wrong.
That second part might prove too difficult for you, though.
Jesus dude
NEVER EVER
hm...
You guys think we'll get a Undead Nightmare 2 for RDR2 ?
one can only hope...
I'm surprised they didn't do something similar for GTAV
they didn't even do any single player DLC...
You didn't say what made the game "bad", you said what you did not like. People have different tastes than you. And then you topped it off with
>Why Sup Forums toes he line with Rockstar games is baffling, it's like you guys can't see that walking/driving and talking is NOT FUCKING FUN, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE.
Which translates to "WHY CAN'T YOU SEE MY SUBJECTIVE OPINION IS OBJECTIVE FACT?"
I agree with you on RDR's pistols and rifles being interchangeable with each other though.
I see a cash shop to buy hats and no DLC. Modern Rockstar are fucking jew rats.
Why is it fun to play in an extremely scripted environment? Why is driving while NPC's are talking fun? That's most of what you do in these games.
autism
congratulations, you are a faggot.
Use your big boy words, please.
Not an argument and none of you have proven him wrong. The fact of the matter is that even though RDR, GTA V and Witcher 3 aren't bad games, they aren't good games in the sense of the old style of games that developers had a different philosophy in design.
They do however have modern tropes that make the game easier for a certain demographic that have never played video games.
He was wrong the moment he hit post.