Would a PS4/Xbone be able to run it? I've yet to see a game as good-looking on those systems

Would a PS4/Xbone be able to run it? I've yet to see a game as good-looking on those systems.

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/4of36n/the_grass_in_the_new_zelda_reveals_what_nintendos/
i.imgur.com/xs0uO5R.png
nintendoeverything.com/nintendo-wii-u-gpu-more-pronounced-than-cpu-but-cpu-not-weak/
wiiudaily.com/2012/09/wii-u-zelda-game-coming-2014/
ca.ign.com/articles/2016/06/24/6-cool-things-we-learned-about-zelda-breath-of-the-wild-at-e3-2016
m.youtube.com/watch?v=FFx38t4ydY0
ca.ign.com/articles/2016/10/21/nintendo-switch-will-support-unreal-engine-4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

if optimized, yea, i guess.

Wii U is just a PS3/360

>Can a ps4/xbone run a 720p game with no textures just cel shaded colors?
This is you my man

it's specs are higher than the ps360. but yea ps4 and xbone would easily run it.
you don't know what cel-shading is do you?
soft textures isn't cellshading

>nintoddler acts like his Weeaboo U station is just as powerful as ps4/xb1

Nah. Those consoles are allergic to fun.

Why are Zeldorks the most delusional of the fanboys? Like Jesus have some self-respect

Yeah but it's also a GPU-centric PS3/360, rather than CPU which is outdated and is what everything runs on. Nintendo was going for the long game with the Wii U, but then they chickened out so all we have to show for it is Zelda. But somehow I doubt the Xbone and PS4 can run it, if even PC can't keep up on some levels since it's GPU.

Keep in mind, The Wind Waker came out the same year Morrowind did and that looks about 3 gens behind Wind Waker. Also, notice how we've only now, 14 years later still learning about things like the Kalle Demos forest water Easter egg. Why didn't anyone ever do this on PC before?

Also, reddit found this reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/4of36n/the_grass_in_the_new_zelda_reveals_what_nintendos/

OK, for starters, try counting the blades of grass in this screenshot: i.imgur.com/xs0uO5R.png
You can't. They're countless.
Of course, we've seen this grass since the very first footage, but it was only about a week or so that I randomly started thinking about how they made the grass in the game work. And this led to a revelation.
To be blunt, it's impossible for the Wii U's CPU to move that many blades of grass at once. They have to be doing the physics on the GPU.
It was upon realizing this, that I began to recall quotes by Nintendo staff (Iwata...? Forgive me for the lack of links to prove my memory, but I believe my memory should be mostly correct)...Around when the Wii U was first coming out and its release flopped, I remember things being said like:
"The Wii U's architecture is actually being defined by the in-development Zelda title in a lot of ways"
"It is taking time for our developers to get used to the new architecture in which many computations are done on the GPU instead of the CPU'.
At the time, this seemed to be little more than buzz talk and excuses. But I think this grass and the physics engine in the new Zelda is what they were talking about. They were developing a new physics engine that would run on the Wii U's GPU.
The tech to do physics on the GPU has been around for some time. But Nintendo is probably the first to use it in such an artful manner. Despite the West generally having the upper edge in 3D technology, Nintendo still somehow manages to find potential for innovation where others do not.
Zelda: Breath of the Wind will likely be the only Wii U title that utilizes this new physics engine, but I think no one will disagree that it is all the more beautiful for it.
EDIT: Here's an article where Nintendo staff are talking about the Wii U's CPU and GPU that vaguely resembles my memory.

It's because Zelda has a nice artstyle which most modern games don't. Technically PS4/Xbone could run the game because they are objectively stronger than the Wii U.

nintendoeverything.com/nintendo-wii-u-gpu-more-pronounced-than-cpu-but-cpu-not-weak/
I traced my memory of 'Wii U being influenced by in-dev Zelda title' back to this article: wiiudaily.com/2012/09/wii-u-zelda-game-coming-2014/
At least one of the hardware features added to the GamePad were solely implemented because the Zelda team figured out they could do something cool with it.
It's a rumor, not official talk by Nintendo employees, and it's talking about Gamepad features rather than Wii U hardware or software. My apologies.

This stuff is pretty cool

>hardware based off old PC hardware is better than the hardware that replaced it

Me thinks they are talking out their ass. Hardware specific API makes a big difference as does quality design. So much really comes down how well its made. Its why TES games run like balls compared to game that look several times better.

It's tough being the only fanbase in this medium with more than one GOTY-worthy game.

Zelda, Zelda II, ALttP, LA, OOT, MM, TWW, TMC, TP (GCN/Wii U). And that's JUST the objective good Zeldas, not even getting into the SUBJECTIVE ones like the Oracles that people fawn about, and Phantom Hourglass which personally I think is one of the best GOAT.

And you think I'm supposed to suppress my gloating, what, for your fee-fees not to get any more hurt?

You have a better chance trying to make a video game better than the 9 Zeldas I just listed before BotW becomes the 10th, lol. Btw my favorite game is better than your favorite.

>being this mad and wrong

Ok son

Textures play no part in the definition of cel-shading ever. The shading in the game is indeed cel-shaded.

All fanboys fucking suck, but Nintendo fanboys are the worst

Not maxed out but maybe 900p 30fps on ps4.

From my point of view, Sony are evil!

You're either trolling or a complete fucking retard. If the NX even attempted to run Uncharted 4 it would explode. A PS3 could play the new Zelda ffs.

You fucking spastic.

Somebody poopoo'd their pants.

We can smell you, we don't need you to spell out that it was you

From my point of view you have been dropped too many times on the head as a baby

THEN YOU ARE LOST!!!

>nintoddlers really think that game looks good, and that real next gen consoles would not be able to run it

holy shit

OBI WAN. GIVE LUKE THE LIGHSABER I MURDERED CHILDREN WITH! YOU WERE A GOOD FRIEND! I HATE YOUUUU!

Triggered Sony baby.

The initial reveal build did look good, but now it just look ok, really, as the game looks currently

Would a Wiiu be able to run it? I've yet to see a game as good-looking on that system.

Grand Theft Auto 5 on PS4, despite being a relatively outdated game, shits on this.

And you're still not able to play it on Wii U or switch.

I play on PC you nintentard

I'm hyped for Breast of the Wyld, but you're stupid OP. There are going to be far more powerful games on the PS4.

Uncharted 4 looks better.

hardware improves a lot faster that human innovation.

This is why at ps4 levels of technology, we still get games on par with gamecube as far as innovation is concerned.

Nintendo seems to follow the principle that once their developers 100% master their system, there is no need for a hardware update.

Look at Zelda and Xenoblade Chronicles X, no game on ps3/xbox360 looks or plays that good. Yet the wii u is basically a ps3/xbox360.

>Look at Zelda and Xenoblade Chronicles X, no game on ps3/xbox360 looks or plays that good.

Wew ladie, this is why you stay at school kids

The standard PS4 can sandbag when stacked up to Switch, Never mind the PS4Pro.

name one game on par with with of them technologically on X36/PS3

>being hyped up for a huge empty overworld with nothing to do
>being hyped up for yet another failed 3d zelda

Obvious bait aside, I agree that BotW will probably be the best looking game of 2016.

The Last of Us
God of War 3
The Witcher 2

OH SO GUD LOOK~

I hope so.
Zelda is one of my favorite series but I wasn't to impressed with the footage. Maybe I've been spoiled by Xenoblade X

PS3 would struggle desu senpai, it has far less RAM than the Wii U. 256MB video + 256MB main, minus however much the OS uses, compared to Wii U's 1GB unified RAM untouched by the OS (OS uses the remaining 1GB to make 2GB total).

Open world games are RAM eaters. It could probably be optimised for PS3, maybe, but the RAM restrictions would be obvious.

PS4, on the other hand, could easily run it without any optimisations whatsoever, and at a higher frame rate and resolution.

>being hyped up for a huge empty overworld with nothing to do
Videos have already sown a lot to do. But more importantly, its a non story foucsed Zelda. Its what I've been waiting for since the N64 days.

>being hyped up for yet another failed 3d zelda
But the last few Zelda games have been some of the highest selling in the series, despite my dislike of them.

>The Witcher 2

XCX is bigger than witcher 3, skyrim and fallout combined. If that's not technologically superior, your games don't even come close.

>The Last of Us
A movie, innovation indeed.

>God of War 3
What is technologically advanced here? It's your generic linear action rpg?

>Videos have already sown a lot to do.
ah Yiiiiis just like videos showd so many things to do when twilight princess was spoiled

BIGGEST OVERWORLD
45 MINUTES TRAVEL TME
OH SHIIZ ITS HUUUUGE

>name 3 games
>name them
>b-b-but those dont count

Every time without fail

Good draw distances are awesome.

I don't really give a shit if the things being drawn in look like shit though.

>on par with with of them technologically

I'm waiting famalam, just give up it'll make life easier

Im not even the guy you replied to but I dont see the point if you gonna keep up putting excuses

>b-b-but it's a movie
>b-b-but it's generic
Also you shit on GoW for being a generic linear action rpg when Zelda it's exactly like that

>Witcher 2
Holy shit that game was worse than Witcher 1.

Here's 4 hours of gameplay in 3 areas.

Wind Waker HD is beautiful, the new Paper Mario is gorgeous. This is fucking trash though.

I don't know why people think early-era PS3 fog is nice looking because it fucking pisses me off looking at how bad it is.

I don't even like Zelda. I asked for something technologically superior to XCX in ps3/x360, you gave me nothing.

Videos didn't show anything with Twilight Princess. We got a shitty trailer that hinted there was a huge wooded area (which turned out to be a lie) and you could fight on horseback. Even back then, I was calling them out, saying the trailer had no gameplay.

On the flip side, they let people actually play Breath of the Wild at a convention and dared people to explore as far as they could. And still people only uncovered 15% of the map. But more importantly, they showed that the game is total free roaming and has almost no story.

Go ahead and keep trying to blast the game with lies. But you're not going to keep people from buying it.

A cliff literally gets drawn in that webm that isn't even very far

>and has almost no story.
In the plateau right? They purposely hid villages.

> And still people only uncovered 15% of the map.

"Hyrule field is 10x larger than OOT"
yeah I've heard that before lmao

Cool. If you want dope draw distances then spend $1200 on an SLI setup and install skyrim and mod it into oblivion (pun intended). Then make a webm of how nice it looks and show it off to you friends.

I'll be busy actually playing games though.

>They purposely hid villages.
And your source? Also, story is fine in a Zelda game. As long as you find it by exploring/talking to NPCs. A game like Twilight Princess sucked as a Zelda game because you couldn't go anywhere or do anything unless you went to the spot the game told you to go.

lol

This game looks like water-color paint with a little bit too much water.

Don't be stupid, you know exactly what the point of that post was.

ca.ign.com/articles/2016/06/24/6-cool-things-we-learned-about-zelda-breath-of-the-wild-at-e3-2016

>Aonuma: “I can't share too much about villages because the way they work is interconnected to the story and overall world. It would be spoilers, so I wouldn't want to do that now. I think that in adventure games the idea of meeting people and saying farewell to them is an important aspect. So that's definitely in there.”

> you couldn't go anywhere or do anything unless you went to the spot the game told you to go.

wind waker did the same BS

Yeah, dude, I agree.

...

I know. Pretty much every Zelda since Majora's Mask did. Hence my comment about waiting for a true free roam Zelda since the N64 days. Though technically you can also say Ocarina and Link's Awakening aren't true free roam. But they were still open enough.

>show me three foods
>a sock, a bench, a bucket of dirt
>those arent foods

hehe i win guys didja see that

Why not? The cel shading looks like arse anyway.

...

ironic shitposting is still shitposting fellas

>WW
>TP
>MC
>"objectively good"
lmao

wind waker was like 70% copy/pasted filler content and fetch quests and escort missions
they couldn't even add more than 4 different enemies to their oh-so-massive great sea

>would a game on a console barely stronger than a wii u be able to run on other systems
Are you functionally retarded?

Red Dead Redemption
The Last of Us
Alan Wake

>1080p on ps4
>720p on wii u

you're hopelessly fucking stupid

Uncharted
GTAV

BotW is not even the best looking game on the fucking WiiU for crying out loud

3DWorld looks eons better than that shit

Except that Botw is designed from the ground up to take advantage of the wii u's/switch's hardware. In fact most likely was built around the idea of being a botw machine while PS4 is a multiplat machine.

>Great Expectations.jpg

>Yet the wii u is basically a ps3/xbox360.

>wind waker
>an old cell shaded game looks good

woooow

We're reaching bait levels that shouldn't be possible.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=FFx38t4ydY0
Can the switch ran this?I think not

ca.ign.com/articles/2016/10/21/nintendo-switch-will-support-unreal-engine-4

No

But it cant run as it doesnt have the power. That is running on a PC in the video.

The lighting and the grass are the only thing graphically impressive about this, and UE4 runs pretty well on most things, so yeah, it probably could.

You are literally a fucking moron if you think the switch could run that. Nintendrones everyone. Enjoy your 400 dollar handheld that wont have half the games they show you running on it.

I think a laptop from 2011 could run that, given the engine. You don't seriously think an empty field is some enormous technological feat, do you?

Well motherfucker download it and play it then fag and we will see whos right. The render distance, ambient occlusion, anisotropic filtering, and foliage on that is much more than the switch can handle and thats an undisputable fact.

Also to answer OP's question; yes the Xbone and PS4 could easily run BotW, its not a super intensive game, it just looks gorgeous thanks to proper use of lighting and other technical wizardry.

Oh shit it has a download? Dank, I embedded the video and didn't notice, thanks user. In any case, ambient occlusion and anisotropic filtering are hardly intensive, the foliage on the trees is nothing to write home about, and the draw distance, while impressive, means little when there isn't much to render except miles of grass and rock. The castle walls are nice, though.

I have no knowledge on anything and am just basing this on an assumption, but I think the gamecube's extremely tiny motherboard and simple architect is what granted it the few minor optimal things it did over pc's

It's art design dickhead they aren't pushes tech. If you think ps4/xbone can't run it you'rr gonna be real sad if it has framerate issues on the Switch

At least he didn't mention Jackie Chan.

>that is much more than the switch can handle and thats an undisputable fact.
>Fact

Source?

This is some of the worst, rankest shitposting I've seen. It's like walking into fucking 2009 again.