Perfect games don't exi

...

Shit combat

>pic unrelated

seriously, asscreed combat

TW3 was so bad it killed OP

WHAT NOW YOU PIECE OF FILTH

Shit combat
boring gameplay and world
Bad graphics on consoles
Edgy story for 12y/o
Downgrades and lies

Wow.. there really is no pleasing this place.

dropped it 5 hours in. and that's coming from someone who finished 1 and 2

Wanting GAMEPLAY in you VIDEOGAME is fucking heresy I know but imagin how unshit the industry would be, just for a second, if it stopped catering to children and people who dont really like videogames in the first place.

I'd love to know what you think a great story is.

So ditch narratives as a whole for pure gameplay?

not him, but they dont exist in the vidya medium nor do they need to

>Shit game

>mario
>doom

or

>bioshock infishit
>uncharted

cinema pretensions and gen 7 were a mistake

witcher defense force, avoiding actual gameplay critique since '15

I would rather play skyrim my man

Go play weeb souls desu

You must fucking hate JRPG's then

Can we just, just for a moment not live in a black and white morality and lets say, firstly concentrate on soemthing that make the medium unique in the first place (gameplay) and secondly in everything that emphizes it (visuals, story etc)
I dont really have a connection to modern games because graphics and story is all there is and for that I already have cinema and books so where is the point? Making vidya redundant? What is this self canibalizing industry?

For someone who only has a PS4, is the game worth it? I obviously don't care too much about frame rate, but I've seen some gameplay and it looks interesting.

Ye it's great most of the comments hating it are the same people posting shit over and over again

This meme is fucking sh..

>For someone who only has a PS4, is the game worth it?
How can people only have one or the other, it's 2016 bro. You should have gaming PC and PS4.

But to answer your question the game is fine on PS4, a very nice timesink too once you get lost in it.

Yes.
But get both extensions too (HoS and B&W), they extend the fun considerably

...

Yes, but I'd recommend getting the DLCs as well.
Hearts of Stone is a breath of fresh air after the main story, and I've heard even better things about Blood and Wine.

Lord of the rings

What now, fampai?

Is there even a single rpg out there that can compete with Witcher 3?

>gog
>4 years difference in release dates

If you are a fan of fantasy RPG type games, yes get it. I finished it last week and it took me over 200 hours but it was worth it and i want more

Not in a position to spend too much cash. When I build a PC, I don't want to half-ass it. Thanks for all the responses, guys.

Fallout new vegas?

Nothing after 2010.

New Vegas it's no contest

Skyrim is better.

every thread I address the
>shit combat XD
complaints with actual reasons and i am always retorted with
>SHIT TASTE BABY WDF FUCKING SHILL

so I have stopped.
blut W3 is incredibly fun

>gog
Irrelevant compared to Steam
>4 years difference in release dates
That's even more embarrassing. A 4 year older single player RPG is still significantly more relevant than the 2015 one

but those reviews are worse?

Can someone tell me how the combat is? I've seen videos but what I want to know is how it controls. Is it like Dragon's Dogma? That's what it looks like.

>176,000 vs 45,000

it is nothing like dragons dogma and I have no idea how you got that.

93% positive out of 176425 reviews
Versus 96% positive out of 54396

What other games is it like? It's hard to tell from videos.

if you don't think the witcher series is great then u r probably a little cuckboy that wanted hillary clinton to be president

Both overrated, Skyrim being 7/10 tops and TW3 being 8/10 at the very best.

Literally this

>muh reviews

meme reviews don't count

>Critique
Please, no one in this thread has made any actual developed arguments as to what makes this game bad.
All people do is shout shit combat without saying why, and even at that, it's all a subjective thing.

I found the combat in Witcher 3 pleasantly fine, I also found the combat in Witcher 2 fine. I always see people complaining about it and I've never understood why.

Half Life 1
Half Life 2

That 5 year old single player RPG is constantly updated with new content for the last 5 years. it's not surprising that people still play it.

Combat in W3 is like Arkam Asylum but with swords and without stealth

he wont respond


witcher has never had good gameplay
its like saying KOTOR had good gameplay

it was a good game overall but come on

>bad graphics on consoles
thats surprising?
every game looks bad on consoles

>Starting a thread with something, somethi...

Is this a new meme?

I never played arkham asylum, is it like Assassin's Creed without a counter button and more gadgets?

I found the combat rather engaging. Sure you can abuse it will godly combination like with every RPG, but I never experienced this "floatiness" people always talk about. The combat system is quite responsive, and every action can be interrupted.

>combat =/= gameplay
An RPG's gameplay is more than just it's combat.
More often than not it's the last thing you think about when playing.

>tfw rpg just means open world chocie making game now