The city of Ubisoft

>The city of Ubisoft

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bwXuPwVavi0
youtube.com/watch?v=pEXmZUtzacU
youtube.com/watch?v=RmnJvv-peF4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Is this for real?

why the fuck are we 'remastering' shit from the current gen? how does everyone manage to make it worse anyway?

"""""Remaster"""""

Outsourced to the same chinese company that did ffx remastered.

They are obviously shit tier at their job but must be the cheapest option around that publishers give no shits.

>2009 Ubisoft
>Smooth, filtered and eligant
>2016 Ubisoft
>Looks like a giant pile of Shit
Poetry

did those hilarious arkham remasters ever come out?

>Send it to some no-name Chinese dev
>Pay them literal peanuts
>No matter the quality of the final product, you're still breaking even and making money because the average consumer is dumb as a stump
>Plus you'll always have fanboys willing to defend your practices
Why the fuck not? It's a sham, anyone can see that, just don't buy it and take pleasure in the fact that dumb people are wasting their money away.

Publishers are taking the piss mate and buyfags eat it all up

>remastering a game that is less than 10 years old

...

Webm related is not sped up.

>trying gameplay to fucking fps

WHY DO THEY KEEP DOING THIS

STOP

ITS TWENTY SIXTEEN

what a joke. all that literally needed to be done was to give to ac2 better lod so buildings didn't have so much pop in and maybe some texture touch ups.

What the FUCK

Why is it that I see this worse remastered stuff in almost every medium? I've seen it in movies, animation, comics and video games. How is this stupidity such a widespread thing?

Spiderman

>Remastered
H-HE'S FAST!

creative bankruptcy

Remasters need to die

dishonored 2 was initially tied mouse sensitivity to fps. thankfully they're attempting to fix it.

it just keeps happening

JUST

Remaster thread?
Remaster thread.

NANI?

fuck off with your fake shit

>Animations is related to FPS

And they still release this shitty remaster ? Quality Control ? no ? kidding it's ubisoft

controller sensitivity is fucked on dishonoured too

>inb4 controller

i like stabbing people and using powers quickly

Because idiot Koreans find it easier to make games like this. Some western studios also have big problems with physics engines being tied to FPS, particularly anything with Havok.

youtube.com/watch?v=bwXuPwVavi0
real m8

max payne 3 has that exact issue and they never fixed it. fuck that game

It's not on purpose.

It's because they forget to delta-time-compensate something and they don't notice it during testing.

kucktaku even tested it. turns out the climb speed bug is leftover from the 360 version.

...

What would a remastered New Vegas look like?

why is remaster blurry? what's the point?

H-HAIYAI!!!

>they don't notice it during testing.

Top kek

they should rename remasters to readJUSTments

>normies wont even care/notice the difference and think its 'cool'

Didn't they cock up Return to Arkham too?

...

those are switched, right?

>Modded gamebryo game
>No drops

DoF in custcenes for aesthetic purposes. What's the problem?

What is up with all these shitty remasters for ps4 and xbone? Can't they just port the PC version and put everything at max? That looks infinitely better than these shitty attempts at "remastering" the originals.

Nope.
youtube.com/watch?v=pEXmZUtzacU

>Canadians
Build a wall!

the fuck is this ac2 ?

i played the game and it didnt look so shit when i played it

Can you nab a gif of the eagle jump?

>remaster
>for a 5 year old game
for literally what purpose

...

It's the shitty ps3 game Kek

It's cheap DoF effect that doesn't recognize edges properly and it makes everything blurred.

simplified lighting and less detail. so what exactly did they pay them for? to make it worse?

To bring to a new system with "improvements", means extra money and can be sold on a PS4.

It's because it's free money. They outsource the "remaster" to some chinks who do a shitty port job for dirt cheap, and suckers still buy the game anyway.

Is this just absolutely shitty porting/remastering or is it something like due to the way PS3/360 were built it's hard to port it to a different architecture.

Why are they remastering it?
the fuck even?
it's just like that fucking batman """""""""""""remaster"""""""""""""""

jesus christ

if you don't know what's going on, it's about the money

T-Takumi ?!

Anyone know if the remake or whatever for Bioshock is any good?

>get some Chinese fuckers to handle your game for cheap
>easy money from stupid retards who legitimately can't tell it looks worse

...

But doesn't it cost a lot more money to remaster a game, spend money on new models and such instead of a simple port of the PC verison, even if you're going to outsource it?

Texture packs don't affect performance, and NV uses very little GPU power, so ENBs aren't as taxing. I have an aging build, i7 950 + 780, and I can run that exact scene at over 60.

Yeah it's console dof.
Figures they couldn't figure out how to implement proper dof in the remaster or something. I'd turn it off but for just cutsenes it's not that big of a deal. At least they got rid of the horrid brown filter.

youtube.com/watch?v=RmnJvv-peF4

I kind of wonder why this one specific model looks so terrible compared to everything else in the cutscene. It's fucking bizarre.

Other then the cutscenes, it's generally worse then the original.

did they let the xyab layout for the ps3?

kek

Graphics + physics framerates are better, but it's more buggy and has awful performance.

than

...

If it weren't cost-effective, they wouldn't be doing it. Either it's cheaper to do than you think, or more people buy them than you think.

These remasters clearly aren't being done for artistic reasons, so there's a sniff of profit somewhere.

Jst b glad I usd fll wrds, im postn frm a phn n cn do much wrst

Looks better, what's the problem? The original looks like a wax model.

>FUCK THIS GAAAAAAAAAME

what the fuck happened to his teeth

...

its a rando low poly model used for the sake of filling the scene i would think. Like to save on resources and all that jazz. Then compound that with that filter being removed making everything look like even more ass and you get that lame as shit. Since in other scenes the rando low model npcs arent framed that closely as that one.

Saves on CPU time, which is at a premium on consoles.

Different architecture and the remasters are handed down to small studios that didnt do the original game.

>Different architecture
Doesn't apply when the game was on PC.

kek

kek

can't even call this veiled it's a obvious cash grab. The videogame industry has ran into the exact same problem the movie industry has. Lack of original ideas after filtering everything for maximized profit.

>chinese coders

Anythings possible

Well this was because they moved from pre-rendered in the original to realtime rendering in the remaster.

The original is usually a work birthed of inspiration and creativity, remasters and adaptions usually lack the love and work put into the original.
One of the only things I can think of off the top of my head that's as good (arguably better) than the original is the Jojo part 1/2 anime, Cromartie, the Gundam 0079 movies and stuff like DMC's special editions, but you can hardly call those remasters.

Publishers found out that people will buy remasters that sell for full AAA game prices, and those remasters are much cheaper to make than new video games.

my god make it stop

and it obviously didnt pay off
i dont see why they would continue doing things that way when it clearly looks work

ICO, SotC, MGS2,3 and PW turned out great for remasters. Hell PW is even better since the original was ad-hoc only.

>after 2 horrible current gen asscreed games, ubisoft announces a break for the series to get the quality back up to standard
>goes on to release the 3 abysmal chronicles games
>poorly remasters the most beloved asscreed game in the series

Is ubisoft trying to kill their own franchise or are they just this incompetent?

That's not even the worst of the Batman remaster.

Note how his skin is growing OVER THE MONOCLE.

>Outsourced to the same chinese company that did ffx remastered.

THEY CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT. PURGE THE CHINKS.

Definitely a """""""""""remaster""""""""""""""

Those weren't remasters though were they? They were just ports.
Excluding Subsistence and Substance though, those were another case of good remasters.

Those costumes in the remaster trigger me the most.

The bottom one legit looks like Shrek or some other early 2000s animation.

>fucking up the only great AC game