The times when Metacritic was just right

The times when Metacritic was just right.

>8.8

I know you're being sarcastic, but I really did like Skyward Sword a lot and think that 93 is probably a bit too high for it.

...

But skyward sword was actually good user,people shit on it on Sup Forums because 'muh Nintendo'/'muh motion controls'/'muh art style'/'muh wii'

ITT:Proving Metacritc as retarded

its good but its the worse 3d zelda
it deserves a 7.5

the motion controls sucked the fun out the game retard

I repeat, the controls were good but it created retarded enemies that were simon says enemies

lose some weight, fattass

not an argument
enemies were piss easy and combat was a bore
same with twilight princess but the amount of moves made it fun

>implying combat has ever been critical to a Zelda game's success
>implying that combat in any prior zelda game was any better

needed more moves and skyward sword made using items cumbersome in combat
Twilight Princess has the most freedom but the easiest enemies ever since you can easily open their guards with moves you unlock from past link

Nah, its a bad zelda game, but its a better game than the majority of games that are released today, zelda games are just that good.

It's the best 3d Zelda but TPfaggots are too casual to enjoy it.

The combat is by far the weakest point of the series,its the only thing i would like to see changed for upcoming games

i can live with that
Plus Fi is the worst

:^)

For metacritic the 93 score is about right,they make these number look higher than they really are like infinite warfare 78 or FFXV 86,when in numeric they are respectively more like 2/5 and 3/5

kill yourself

Jesus Christ... This game is a 5 at best.

I had fun with Skyward Sword but it deserves a 7 at most.

>zelda cycle is continuing
fuck off, i dropped this game when you had to repeat dungeons
brilliant artstyle though

What's wrong with that?