Watchdogs 2

>Watchdogs 2
>1070 can't even keep a stable 60fps at 1080p

You must be fucking kidding me.

hahahah you must be fuggin giddings me :DDDDDD

>he thinks pc games are optimized

come on, you should by now know after dues ex and dishonored 2.

If D44M can exist then other devs have no excuse.

>46fps on GTX1060
Fucking console ports

wft?
insider version was running well enough with a 1060

>Very high quality

That's pretty much ultra.
People who do benchmarks on ultra are retarded because there are so many ridiculous frame killing settings such as HBAO+. High is a good indication of where the game is properly at.

What about scalability? Does it run well on potato hardware on lowest settings or is it a shit port?

>silky smooth 27fps

They used temporal filtering. Basically, the game renders at half res then upscales with AA.

With that, pretty much double all the framerates seen here, but the game looks like shit at 60fps with it on.

Mate, HBAO+ hasn't been very intensive for like two years now.

It can run on consoles at 30, so I assume there's a setting in there somewhere.

and that'ss with a crazy overpowered 5960X
I guess we'll need a GTX 1080 for barely handling 60 fps with an average i5 CPU

>that 1080p performance
>realize you play at 1440p

What card?

>tfw 480 8gb black friday for $250

>Ubisoft
>not expecting shit in every way
>actually buying anything Ubisoft

Is Sup Forums actually a casual board?

I've some how managed to get a steady 60 fps on foot on my 1070, with almost everything on very high.
Driving literally kills the game though, it's actually unplayable.
Kinda sad that the best game the Ubi has made in years is going in the trash cause no one can fucking run it lol.

Congrats. If you want ultra/60fps You'll need SLI 1080s or Xfire Fury Xs.

Do you have temporal filtering on?

I've been averaging 50 fps with the new Hitman at 1440p on my 1070, is Anti-aliasing or SSAO (I forget what that does) necesaary at that high of a resolution?

They don't need excuses, there are always some stupid kids that will buy it even if it's literally unplayable (arkham knight and mafia 3 at launch are good examples).

OP benchmarks are 1080p. Still need AA at that res.

gj mr smiley gold man

This can be summed up with
>gameworks

I know, I'm just asking for my own case because who the fuck is going to play meme dogs 2?

>Yet another Nvidishit title running like ass

They don't need excuses, pc gaming is irrelevant.

...

Does the game look better than GTAV?

...

>Mate, HBAO+ hasn't been very intensive for like two years now.

20 frames over SSAO isn't intensive?

JUST

>pc gaming

What fucking game are you playing?
I've never heard of such an insane variance.

It's like 2-3fps in Witcher 3. Less in some other titles.

But it also ran at 60fps on console which most games do not.

A hundred times.

>Be PC fag
>Buy broken game
>Runs at 40-50 fps
>Complain
>Get patch
>fix'd

>Be Consolefag
>Buy broken game
>Runs at 15-25 fps
>*shrug*
>Keep on playin'

...

>doom 44

Leave my country immediately

480 is below 1060 and 980, 36-45 fps
CF on top is 2 480 in crossfire

welp guess i need to upgrade from my 980ti this year

While having more raw texture detail, which really doesn't account for much because no one gives a shit about seeing the pores on character model's skin, I would say no, it really doesn't look that much better than GTA 5. Plus GTA 5 ended up being a damn good pc port.

>Get patch

not sure what you expected from ubisoft devs, you pretty much have to play their games at locked 30 fps unless you like roller coasters.

Temporal Filtering is the laziest shit Ubisoft is starting to pull for "optimization" because they are too lazy to make a polished game. It makes R6Siege look like total blurry ass

>gtx970
>32fps
its over lads, time to upgrade