Why do people even compare something with even the slightest bit of difficulty to dark souls now?

Why do people even compare something with even the slightest bit of difficulty to dark souls now?

>Path of Exile is the Dark Souls of action RPGs
>Dragon's Dogma is the Dark Souls of fantasy RPGs
Then what is Dark Souls the Dark Souls of?

Because on the other side you have "cinematic experiences" that sometimes barely even need and player input at all.
If you compare even marginally difficult games to that you arrive at "the dark souls of x".

Dark Souls

Wouldn't that be Demon's Souls?

Well, that truly is the Dark Souls of questions.

Because consolefags are dumb

...

Small pool of reference.

Because when it came out Dark Souls was a bit different than other games that would apparently "hold your hand." that and they marketed it as such after a while. it got old really quick

...

I'd play it

no because: the dark souls of dark souls is dark souls sounds better than the dark souls of dark souls is demon souls.

1. Because normies are fucking dumb.
2. Because Bamco memed it up with ads declaring it the hardest game ever
3. We (Sup Forums) are to blame for making DaS popular

Also, being the "dark souls"of X just means it's "difficult", when it should (also) mean the plot is missable unless you put in an effort and seek it out.

Because it was the first somewhat difficult but also popular game to come out in quite a while.

Considering Bandai owns the trademark now, you will.

>9 games that are the Dark Souls of their genre

fucking really?

Dark Souls is only considered hard because the marketing tells people so.

Who is the Dark Souls of politics?

Isn't it obvious why? Dark Souls is very popular, and one of its defining characteristics is challenge.

Bloodborne is the Dark Souls of the Souls series.

Trump

Has everything stacked against him and taking everything to the face before winning

Ge is still playing with that recount coming up that is only affecting three states that can give Hilary the win

...

>say that when the election is over (assuming that you've won because you're a retarded cunt) that everyone should take the count at what it is
>lose
>bitch and moan
>do a recount

Oh hilary and her fucking stupid sheep with no sense of integrity

Fuck man

She would need all three though and they would need to find massive amounts of rigging in all.

There is a reason Hillary didn't want to make a statement on it and only had her spokesperson say something after the was pressured by her followers. She knows it's just Jill doing a Bernie an grabbing some donation money.

even then he still has to worry about the electors come January changing their votes

Hasn't that happened like one or twice if at all in the usa's entire history?

Only happened a couple of times and it was never a relevant amount of electors.

And while this election definitely doesn't fall under "normal", I very highly doubt they would risk something that might incite civil war.
Especially since almost everything they bitch about is a meme, Trump isn't even remotely as radical as they pretend.

>smt4
>persona game