GTA """""""Killers"""""""
ITT
Other urls found in this thread:
Is it fun?
any normie will tell you that it's not GTA. You're dumb and full of assumptions.
this is thread about failed GTA killers idiots
did you even read what I said? Go back to grade school and learn grammar, again.
>Being an autistic cunt
You must hate your life
I got the original for free and still felt ripped off but what I've seen from watchdogs 2 actually looks really good, the writing has some real funny moments
This game is only fun if you play it "non-lethal"
But it's still a ridiculous game, filled with
C R I N G E
SuperBunnyHop did a great review on it
youtube.com
1. runs at 40 fps on 1070
2. denuvo
3. kernel anticheat=worse than denuvo kind of invasion
4. language lock, region locks are fine, but language locks , damn
5. hipster sf cringe fest
6. ubisoft open world checklist
do not touch with 10ft pole
Remember me Sup Forums?
Hey, George. How's that MGS4 vid coming along?
fuck
The most obvious one
I like how they've released two so far and we still have GTA 5.
Saints Row 1 and 2 are great Saints row 3, 4 and Gat out of Hell can suck my black cock
GTA5 has a vibrant online though.
You now remember pic related
saints row games are fun and not really try to be a gta replacement
Maybe they should have taken their time and just made one good game instead of two bad games.
You misunderstood me.
They've rushed out two crap games and yet Rockstar is still supporting GTA 5 working on possibly GTA 6 alongside Red Dead 2.
Runs at 40 fps if you dial every single option up to ultra retard
...
yeah
Galo sengan
but why?
>a
This was more of a Taxi Cab clone.
Bună ziua
What a shit argument. A GTX 1070 is a top 3 GPU and costs 500 euro. This game should be easily playable on a gtx 1070 with at least 60 fps.
Are you a shill or something?
what
>There will never be another Saints Row game like 2 because 3 fucked it all up
>PCucks
lol
three was fun as fuck dudes
4 ruined it with the superpowers that rendered half the game mechanics useless
I remember it user
>WAAAAHHH WHY WONT MY FANCY COMPUTER RUN THIS EXTREMELY COMPLEX AND VASTLY OPEN WORLD GAME ON THE MAXIMUM SETTINGS!!!!!!!!
Wow what an entitled shitlord you are
Just because you spent thousands of dollars on your autistic neckbeard machine doesn't mean you're entitled to run every ambitious new game that comes out. It took fucking years before anyone was able to run Crysis at the maximum graphics options.
Watch Dogs
>Fun stealth gameplay
>Challenging hacking minigames
>Likable MC and crew that are actually funny without trying too hard to be edgy
>Most of the open world isn't empty
>Actual fun side activities
>Multiplayer/co-op is a neat bonus
>Will actually provide more single player content in the future
GTAV
>Yoga
>Crane missions
>Tennis
>Dog walking
>Clicking ads off a computer
>Same shoot enemies to win formula since GTA 3, no variety
>Main characters are a tacked on black guy to tap into peoples nostalgia, a edgy balding faggot and a literal cuck
>Not one memorable side character or enemy
>Multiplayer was clearly the main focus, no single player DLC 3 years despite loyal fans asking for it
fucking nigger trigger discipline
ayy
The first one goal was to "kill" GTA but they failed so they went the "lol so random" path.
>Not the stun gun
I didn't kill one person in my playthrough not counting the people I accidentally ran over
4 was just finishing what 3 started.
I honestly hope you're joking about 3 being good.
It's the worst one and what ruined the series.
>buying nvidia in 2016
Crysis still looks better than Watch Dogs 2 you shill fuck
At least 3 was somewhat a saints row game
4 was just a shitty Infamous/Prototype ripoff that milked nostalgia way too hard
You're still not entitled to run Watch Dogs 2 at max settings you permavirgin manbabby
ambitious new game with insane graphics =/= unoptimized piece of shit
Um yea, if I spend big bucks on hardware, I expect good results. The game is optimized like shit. GTA V looks just as good and runs much better. Are you an idiot?
>"fun" stealth "gameplay"
It was more like a back problems simulator with all the bending down and single button prompt for takedowns. I barely had to try sneaking around people
The only thing watch dogs killed was the last remaining value ubisoft had
He said somewhere that he didn't want to do it because of the story
what cpu you running i'm at a solid 60 with my 1070
Who is the autist here?
A well optimized game would run like butter on a 1070. Do you even know how powerfull a 1070 is? It could take on 10 ps4´s
There is no game on this planet so far, that wouldn´t run smooth as fresh cotton on a 1070 on everything maxed if it´s well optimized.
You are just a shill.
And you are okay with 60fps`? Watch dogs 2 doesent look special at all. It should be so hard to run srsly.
Got it for free so I got to playing for a few hours. It's not as bad as I thought it would be, definitely a big improvement over the first. I like how they expanded the 'hacking' you have at your disposal so you can have fun sending rival gangs or cops on random people, causing huge fights in the middle of town while you go sneaking around picking up cash in paper bags and shit. The protagonist isn't bad either, he's pretty likable and you can immediately dress him up in something respectably non-millenial. Graphics are very good too.
Having said all that, some core gameplay elements are really fucked. Shooting is dull as fuck and the driving (while weightier than WD) is still iffy as fuck. Physics in general is just generations behind GTAV and other Rockstar games' physics too.
It's a good PC port though. Shit's running great at 4k on my i5 4690 and GTX1080 spec. That said, there are some complaining about pretty rampant crashes and stutters happening to them on pretty good machines, so be wary. I think it's the usual Ubishit situation where it needs more patches.
I'm having the most fun in game just taking screenshots instead of actually playing though.
...
well it spikes up to 80, but 60 fps at the least on ultra is perfectly fine for me on my 60Hz ultra wide
Is that touched up? looks pretty good. I think it should run easily on a 1070 and 1080 though.
Nah, just used the camera on either the phone, the RC or the aerial drone. Just adjusted brightness on some of the shots to either make them darker or brighter. It does run pretty easily on my rig, but I'm guessing there are some who are unlucky and have it run like shit despite their hefty rig. I think the game does have a memory leak issue though, I find that sometimes shit gets way too intense for with explosions and such at one time or another and the whole game will become a stuttering mess until you restart it.
The game has issues, some fixable but most aren't for me. The shit driving is the worst of them all, for sure.
...
Hello world, I'm a hacker, and I say togethet, we tear down the walls.
Rockstar didn't make mafia???
...
To be fair, V is a stain on the franchise
>dude let's make a game about robbing banks
>the only way you can actually make money is by using the stock market
Agreed. GTAV is a frustrating thing for me. I love it enough to mess around in it like I used to do in the older GTA games, but nothing in the game is as satisfying to go through till completion as previous GTA games, including GTAIV. Which is fucking nuts and I honestly can't put my finger on why the fuck this is.
They tried to make it into a 'real-life' simulator. Instead of vigilante missions and gambling, we got yoga and tennis.
SPICY MOVE
i5 2500k and a BRAND SPANKIN NEW GTX1080 here. I get 80 fps on ultra at 1440p and that's with the HUGE bottleneck that is my CPU, try not being a poorfag next time.
What's most irritating is that you don't get anything from doing them either. You just do QTEs for a bit and then wonder why the fuck you would choose to do such a thing. At least the tennis and golf are fun enough to actually sink time into.
Fuck that game, good thing there are plenty of mods on PC to add a shitload of other gameplay elements to play with. Gang wars and more heists especially.
You're thinking of Road Rage
>implying GTA will do well after that piece of shit V was
I think you are upset because they chose to stray away from being a typical GTA clone.
But it was still mechanically just a GTA clone though. Just that they went OTT with their wacky shit, that's all. It's a GTA clone that has its own themes and aesthetics. Above all though, it was a bad sequel to the SR2, which was pretty fucking great.
Whoops, wrong image.
It's not even max settings.
Even one bit of AA fucks your performance and it drops from 90 to 40.
Without AA the game is fucking unplayable because there are jaggies EVERYWHERE
Is this with AA? Looks nice in my opinion.
...
MSAA? Don't user. Don't touch that or the TXAA. You'd probably have better results and performance just downsampling that shit or increasing pixel density to 1.5.
I just settle with 4k and SMAA, jaggies totally gone.
Yes that's with 4x TXAA
I don't have a screen saved with no AA but I can make one quick to show you.
And yeah it actually does look good sometimes
It's nu-fun
You can only increase to 1.25, not much of a difference imo
Fuck, really? Then downsample that shit from 1440p to 1080p. MSAA is horrible, in fact it's been horribly implemented in a lot of recent games for some reason. TXAA is even worse since it's 2xMSAA plus the temporal technique that TXAA brings to the table. Shit's a performance hog.
Saints Row originally tried killing GTA, then it settled into its own niche and eventually killed itself.
I'm still mad.
Even with AA off I can't get stable 60FPS
Jesus, those jaggies can hurt someone. And yeah, framerate fluctuations is a common complaint from what I've seen. It's a good PC port but it's still an Ubishit game, it needs patches.
Holy god those jaggies. was right. If only 4x TXAA didn't murder even my 1080.