...so it's trash?

...so it's trash?

That's a good score though

Why do you virgins think anything in the 80s is bad?

No it's not

SONYGGERS BTFO

Yes it is, did you ever learn math?

God, I fucking hate Sup Forums

In what country or school is 80 a bad score?

Not him but what is then?

Why is this allowed?

>10 years to make with constant delays
>Looks exactly like it did on PS3
>If you don't own a pro framerate is absolute shit

From what I've seen it's not worth my $60 i'd rather get a Gravity Rush 2.

Sup Forums

I don't get this picture. Does this mean every system sucks?

>Game has a gameplay related flaw
>100

the meme is real

Sounds like its worth playing only on Sup Forums is anything below a 90 irredeemable garbage, anything above a 90 is paid reviews. Good games don't exist on this board.

Jesus, it's even color coded to help you retards understand.

Have you seen the game? the doggo ai is beyond retarded

Not me. IDGAF about review scores. Played plenty of great games which I later found out had a 6 or 7 on metacritic. Whatever.

Fucking this. I hate reading a review for a shit game and in the end the game gets a 6/10. What the fuck? Where did the 6 points come from?

>A review site with playstation is the fucking name gives it a perfect score
>But it has clunky controls
Who would have thought thats not how a perfect score works.

>all those bandwagon dudebros that got hyped for something they don't understand
>they are going to shit on it because it's not a hella fucking epic uncharted sequel

>takes ten years to make
>$60
>hyped to no end by sony cucks
considering these factors, yes it's shit

...

It's not a good score considering how long it took to make and how hyped the game was. If Half-life 3 came out with a score less than 98 it would be considered shit.

>82 score
>BTFO

Excuse me?

Are you talking about FF15?

Its a sad era of gaming if you ask me.
Even the user reviews are filled with monotonous port begging or very specific complaints that are usually arbitrary.

If a good game gets a bad review - its shit.
If a bad game gets a great review - its shit.
If an okay game gets an okay review - its shit.
At this point just choose for yourself.

and this is the perfect reason why Sup Forums's opinion on video games is complete trash

I don't even know what type of game it is. Is it supposed to be a niche game with zero marketing?

The logic is perfectly sound though

>HL2 releases in late 2004
>PLEASE GIVE US MORE

From that day onward, it's our god-given right to assume that you're working on HL3.

12 years and counting, so when the sequel actually releases, you owe us a game that was worth 12+ years of waiting, and it has to be judged based on that. For that reason FFXV is a pile of vomit, because it has to make up for FFXV, for Versus XIII and for that other turd that was the entire XIII trilogy. It turns out it doesn't make up for one single good game at all, therefore it deserves all the bashing humanly possible here or anywhere else.

tl;dr having standards and bashing long anticipated titles is perfectly reasonable, loving them unconditionally based on desperation ion order to validate all the waiting is retarded.

Place your bets.

>the boy dies trying to save Trico
>Trico dies trying to save the boy
>both live
>both die
>Trico has a major wound and the boy has to put Trico out of his misery via QTE
>Trico goes full evil at the end and the boy has to kill the bird dog

and to say a score of 98 or lower is considered shit is fucking retarded, just like Sup Forums

What do you think SOTC and ICO were?

Thats really not how gaming development works. You're not going to get 12+ years of game development esque work just because you were waited 12 years. Not the way the world works.

given the tract record of Team Ico with both Ico and Shadow of the Colossus

they both live, but there is a moment where you think Trico will die

>Arma 3 has 73 score on metacritic
>PCucks constantly market the game as on of the reasons to get gaming PC

>TLG has 82 score on metacritic
>It's trash, blunder, hurr Sonyggers

I don't get it.

Isnt there already a thread with spoilers or was that fake?

Are we doing so well that you faggots have to try and sell a score in the 80s as bad?
That's pretty neat

You know why....

Except the game wasn't really all that hyped up when compare to something like say FFXV.

Last Guardian is very niche and there wasn't very many threads on Sup Forums up to it's release. There's only threads now to shitpost about the "bad" score.

I had no idea itbwas even coming out today same with how ai had no idea Let It Die was already out and F2P.

>sony cinematic emotional experience
>not trash
pick one

It does.

Take KH3. I don't give a goddamn flying fuck if you thought it was a good idea to have ten teams working on a KH for GBA, one for PSP, one for DS, one for 3DS. You should've just fucking made them into KH3, and then we would be waiting for KH4.

If KH3 isn't absolutely perfected, it deserves truckloads of shit, because it's been 10 years since the prequel, the only other mothership entry, KH2.

It's no different than what happened with Peace Walker

>B-But PW was originally meant as MGS5PW

So what? You just took PW, regurgitated most of it and made a homeconsole entry, seven years for such a thing. You can feel sorry for Kojima all you want, but what happened in the last six months he brought on himself. Sony also kicked Ueda out for the same "delusion of grandeur now at 10fps" bullshit, it's not a coincidence.

>TLG took 10 years to make!

Is people here too young to remember this game was cancelled like 2 years in development and resurrected years later?

I pick both. ICO and SotC were great.

>first FFXV
>now this
How will sonyggers ever recover?

You could just stop following gaming media and make up your own mind.

Go to YouTube and watch a few gameplay vids from some unknown channel with 50k views.

Nothing forces you to be a normalfag, you can break free.

>the gameplay is pure perfection (aside for some clunky controls)

>recover

From what? That they are getting good games one after another?

>good games
You mean "mediocre movies", right?

no, good games

No i think he said good games, just because Sup Forumsirgins doesn't like them that doesn't mean everyone does

No I meant good games. I'm sorry you can't read.

I need to know, Sup Forums: what's the perfect score for vidya? If an 80 or below is "absolute garbage" and anything in the 90s is "paid reviews REEEEE", then where's the middle ground? What's the magic number that all games should shoot for?

Ico was born as a PS1 game, DMC was born as a PS1 game, Onimusha was born as a PS1 game, Too Human was born as a dos game, DNF was born as a win 98 game. It does not matter what happens backstage, it's their own fucking problem.
>sorry your hamburger took so long, our kitchen is defective

Yes games that fans have been waiting for should definitely be made to be in pristine condition but I don't expect them to be perfect. They will not be. They always end with 3-4 years of dev anyways, so I expect a game of that quality.

And even with that said, if anything the initial focus gets lost throughout such a period of time. It sounds shit but my standards are always far from high because of this alone.

Games long in the making will always just be "good".

Final Fantasy and Ico team games are movies too now? Holy shit, every day you learn something new.

>PCucks are still assblasted that Bloodborn never ever is coming to PC, so they try and shit on any Sony game coming out

Hi Neogaf, how do you like your new movie in buttery smooth 29 FPS?

Yes and the Xbone became the lest shitty simply because it managed to not do much of anything in the end, like Luke Or ddi you forget that the one who killed the emperor was a broken Vader and Lando destroyed the Death Star 2

>muh neogaf boogieman

Look if you cant find enjoyment out of games anymore that's your own problem

hi PCuck how are those shitty ports?

Final fantasy has been a movie for a while yea.

Hi /rpcmasterrace/. How do you like your new petitions for Sony games and eternal asshurt?

if you go to a good college a 3.0 is mediocre

>he didn't watch PSX.
>he forgot about RDR2

Pretty cool, as well as my games. How's your analhurt PCock?

>game has gameplay
>it's movie because there are cutscenes there
>Witcher, Deus Ex, Zelda are movies not games

PC idiot found.

Adults who like KH are just as pathetic as adults who like MLP.

>it's movie because there are cutscenes there
>Witcher, Deus Ex, Zelda are movies not games
nice strawman m8, thanks for shoving words in my mouth

Are you seriously implying adults can only like games where there's tits, blood and swearing?

Explain to me how Final Fantasy and TLG are movies then? Argument "I don't like gameplay even though I actually never played it so it's movie" dont' count. Please explain.

hes a PCuck, they never have any answer

I didn't even say TLG was a movie you autist.

Jesus christ get shitposting off the brain

No. Adults who like KH are just as pathetic as adults who like MLP.

Why?

user you might be the most deluded and entitled person I've ever seen post on this board.

Enjoy the (you) and your miserable life.

So we agree that TLG and FF are games, and "Sonyggers" don't have to recover from anything. Ok.

actually, going back through you said
>You mean "mediocre movies", right?
which you were replying to
>From what? That they are getting good games one after another?
which in turn was a reply to this
>>first FFXV
>>now this
>How will sonyggers ever recover?

so yeah you did call TLG a movie, you stupid PCuck

I never did said dat! ;_;
>how do you like your new movie in buttery smooth 29 FPS?

At least show balls and admit that you are mentally challenged and we leave you alone. How about it?

Fucking food analogies

its out?

Keep in mind I haven't specified HOW pathetic.

But for the very obvious reason that they are both designed for young children.

I'm kind of intrigued at just how bad the controls and camera are in TLG seeing as that seems to be the perpetual sole complaint. Surely it can't be worse than SotC or Ico

Absofuckinglutely.

how

>You're not going to get 12+ years of game development esque work just because you were waited 12 years

Not that user but while I agree with you I understand the other anons thought process here.

Technically because FF15 was originally FF13 Versus and was utilizing the same base engine and assets FF13 was at the beginning it does indeed have 12 years "worth" of development to it's name.

The problem is not all of those 12 years were worth integrating into the final build. And this is looking at the issue through a vacuum without including the observation and cross pollination that occurred with the devs who touched the FF13 trilogy and FF15.

thats incredibly immature

It's thanks to shovelware like Big Rigs that shit games still get 6/10 because they at least work

>hyped up

The only people looking forward this are TeamICO cocksuckers

Do you think Disneyland was made for adults? No. Adults go to real thrill parks like Six Flags. Disneyland is for kids and families.

Tomorrow

>But for the very obvious reason that they are both designed for young children.
Breaking news bud, most games are designed for young children

Pretty good. How are you enjoying your petitions?

It's a fucking PS2 game, warts and all. The game can still be good but it is absolutely, 100 percent, fucking INEXCUSABLE for the game to have camera control problems in 2016. Steam Greenlight games have proper first person control. Third person camera control has been in use for literal fucking DECADES at this point and you STILL managed to fuck it all up.

what key component of a family user...
give you a hint, kids are optional

Whatever helps you feel happy and spending your "mature" adulthood watching refined cartoons and games for kids.

you are very retarded

holy shit, i'm so happy im not you

The scales are relative you dumb fucks. Video game review scores are inflated therefore the standards are different. 80 is not a good score for video games.

Kek, yeah OK. I can sense your major life regrets from here so I won't go there.

>worse than Final Fantasy XV
Apologize.

Why do Sony consoles struggle so much to get legitimately great games? I start to pity them, really.

just admit you dont know, you dont have to avoid the question