AMD GPUs get better with every update and age like fine wine

>AMD GPUs get better with every update and age like fine wine
>Nvidia GPUs become more and more gimped every update to sell the latest card

Why does Sup Forums always shit on AMD yet suck Nvidia's cock on everything?

Other urls found in this thread:

hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/73945-gtx-1060-vs-rx-480-updated-review.html)
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Quite a few reasons...

>Zero competition
AMD does not have a flagship offering. Their offerings are for 1080p gaming only.

>No Overclocking headroom
This has been an issue for 3 gens now, their cards don't OC for shit. I just got my 980 Ti's running at 1640mhz core clock. Their stock boost is only 1075mhz... That's some massive fucking gains friend, and it didn't cost a cent more.

>Goyworks
This shit is stupid and I hate Nvidia for doing it, but it does look sexy as fuck and AMD doesn't get it.

>DX12meme
It's not here yet not sure why people keep tooting AMDs horn for an API that may not even make it to mainstream... Nvidia runs better on Vulkan than AMD does which makes NO FUCKING SENSE...

It's mostly just these last few years, AMD'll make a come back hopefully.

>4%

it's fucking nothing

>AMD are poorfags who have to stick with the same card for years
>nVidia are masterrace who always keep up with the latest and greatest

>huge resolution
>everything is blurred to shit, crap texture quality
why

>poorfag projecting
Yeah man, Ryse is an awful looking game fo srs.

>up to maybe sometimes 8% in this one scene we swear and specific settings
>graph presents it like a doubling of performance
>guys we brought features the competition had for 2 years now, praise us already
Those reasons, among others.

OP why are they lying?

I just buy whatever has better benchmarks at the mid-low price point every couple years.

>AMD does not have a flagship offering. Their offerings are for 1080p gaming only.
implying 70% of Sup Forums can afford 1080, they bitch about not being able to play denuvo games and you want them to spend $1k on a video card

The new Nintendo console's using NVidia technology though right?

Fox news tier graph making skills right there

that's 7 fps free, you don't have to buy new card for it

He asked for reasons why NVidia is a better product, what does the cost have to do with whether or not one is flat out better? We know Sup Forums is filled with kids and poorfags but there are plenty of us with actual jobs who can afford this shit and for now it's a no brainer, AMD doesn't have anything to offer the 1440p/4k market.

50m ps4 sold
hell if I know how many xbones
480 sold out everywhere(hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/73945-gtx-1060-vs-rx-480-updated-review.html)
nvidia fucked up drivers several times this year, amd only once
against minuscule 65% of pc market

technically it's true

It was wrong so I fixed it.

my 390 works fine for 1440 since last year

>technically it's true
Yes, that's what's called a lie.

>it's okay when nvidia does it

Yes, thankfully.

I would lose my shit if they used an APU like Sony & MS.

>390
>Literally same as 290
>Pretending it ever ran 1440p max settings and held 60fps in current titles

I like my AMD card too man, but lets get real here.

nintendo doesn't know what they are into
EVERYONE who worked with nvidia dropped them first chance they got

desu i don't really know what the pros/cons of that stuff is

you probably got an i5, with i7 card is still pretty good
amd drivers get that little push with i7s, I wonder if I update to ddr4 before going vega or not
ddr4 3000+ should bring a bit more fps for it

Oh look, another AMD fags congratulating themselves on smoke and mirrors thread.

the xbox one and ps4 have AMD GPU so it's true

>slides about GPU drivers for Windows (and maybe Mac/Linux)
>muh console APU sales
Yes user, they are lying, like they usually do.

no it's not a lie it's even written in the fucking pick it include console
and they don't say more "PC gamer" and use vague terms for a reason
their sentence is true
it's just easy to misunderstood

Wii U as well uses AMD GPU.

360 also used "AMD" GPU although it was designed and branded by ATi back then who AMD bought out.

The GameCube / Wii GPU was branded ATi as well, although ATi did not design it. It was designed by a small company called ArtX who ATi purchased.

But anyway if you include all of the above as AMD it really does add up.

>you probably got an i5, with i7 card is still pretty good
Openly admitting AMDs drivers are so fucking bad they bottle neck weak ass cards with massive amounts of driver bloating on the CPU. Bravo.

Anyhow, I'm perfectly happy with my 980 Ti's that are matching 1080s due to massive fucking OC capability.

>AMD thread
>still no competition for 1070, 1080 and TitanXP after 6 months, just like there was no competition for 970 and 980 two years ago
>Nvidia still has most of the desktop market share and makes more money per gpu sold since its gpus cost more
>Nvidia fully controls the discrete gpu on mobile, with laptops performing as well as desktop rigs
>90% of professional market still use Quadro and Tesla only
>GPGPU still Nvidia only

>bbbbut AMD improved framerate by 4% with the latest drivers on their low midrange gpu!

Holy shit you fags are pathetic, AMD turned ATI into a joke.
AMD is now for gpus the same that it is for cpus: UTTER SHIT.

>Nvidia runs better on Vulkan than AMD does
Ufuckingwotm8?

>Nvidia runs better on Vulkan than AMD

[Citation Needed]