It huts

It huts

My penis hurt

Never base your expectations on anything that's put out before release.
Never.

the bottom looks better

You didn't seriously think it was going to look like that right?

>expecting a game on any platform to ever look like its initial cinematic reveal
haha what

>nintendrones

no
no it fucking doesn't m8

Even the gameplay they showed in december 2014 looked way better than the e3 2016 showcase

If you want to stare at blades of grass then just go outside you stupid neckbeard.

Saged and reported. I fuckin' hate these anti-Nintendo threads.

what makes me sad is... if they didn't fell for the Open World meme, the 2014 aesthetics could've been perfectly doable in a game with small to regular size maps, at least on NX. They sacrificed that for performance issues, and even so, the game barely holds itself at 30fps.

It hurts.

>That blurriness makes it look like a wonderful oil painting. Everything is A OK.

It's probably the physics.
Shit eats processor cycles like a neckbeard eats doritos

Look at this false flagging shit.

thas what happens when u make ur console mobile

What happened?

>falling for press
>ever

We've seen trailers with lush grasslands.

It's probably the same model actually.
Just different textures and shading.
Likely the actual Wii U can't handle rendering at max settings

L M A O
M
A
O

?

Doesnt this counts as "starting console wars"?

>caring about the grass in your game

How so?
Just complaining about fake advertisement.
Nintendo used to be better than that
How is it console wars if you're the first idiot who actually said anything about other consoles?

>grass is the only issue here

>Grass
>Not the PSX-tier cardboard cutout treetops
>Not the N64-like textures
>Not the glorious pop-in
>Not the fog everywhere
>Not the shitty draw distance with bad LOD
>He thinks people complain about the grass
kys

I wonder how much the physics and the extremely large maps would improve the gameplay. I don't remember enjoying overly complex games besides simulators, and Zelda definitely isn't suitable for a "sword & shield simulator". And travelling between checkpoints... ugh. Not even Xenoblade Chronicles managed to make travelling enjoyable, not even with fast travels. Some spots are so fucking hidden or completely inaccessible unless you turn around and try a different route.

Shit is gonna flop hard but hopefully people will still fall for it and make it a successful product.

it's typical of the industry, you overdramatic fuck.

Nope Nintendo has never changed the designs of the games before they come out.

Early screenshots/trailers are ALWAYS different from the finished product.

To be fair the Link the e3 2011 demo was never confirmed, but was pretty misleading.

>It's ok when nintendo etc etc

sorry

If you couldn't tell the top pic was a bullshot you must be the most naive man on Sup Forums

That was just a techdemo, that was (supposedly) an early build of the game.
Try again

Two simple questions for Nintendo and its fan boys:

Why can't Zelda be more realistic like Twilight Princess
Why can't Nintendo just make a regular, powerful console

*the other*

>getting all that from a jpg that is 169 KB, 1280x339 which features footage put through youtube

>major company bullshots their games

This is completely unprecented. An outrage.

Stop the presses. The sky's falling down, the apocalypse has begun, cats and dogs will lie down together, every man for himself, and all that jazz...

It's completely okay. Nintendo did it. It's okay.

>realistic
>TP
Pick one. Zelda always had old anime style art (look at most concept arts), it's just that they nevr had the graphical fidelity to pull it off.
After Aonuma came in it became more cartoonish, but that's his style (see Marvelous).
Powerful consoles are expensive, and after the n64 and GC blunders Nintendo decided they wanted out that wild ride. Can't blame them, even if I don't like it

>nintendo defense force

you guys are always good for a laugh

Remember to report shitpost threads and don't post without sage

Because that jpg is the only image we have from it, right?

From the moment I saw that reveal trailer, I knew the game wouldn't look like this unless Nintendo decided to make PC games from there on out
Which unfortunately they didn't.

I still think the game looks good but here's what really hurts about it: the initial E3 reveal is EXACTLY the style I wanted for the new Zelda. The coloration, the people/goat models, it's just perfect,

>Why can't Zelda be more realistic like Twilight Princess
Because "muh realism" made TP look like shit

>Why can't Nintendo just make a regular, powerful console
Because that's what PC is for. Nintendo trades a little power for innovation that the industry sorely needs right now. If you can't see past the specs then you're looking at the wrong company because Nintendo cares about gameplay first and not the "cinematic experiences" everyone else is pushing.

I have a feeling that Nintendo wants to perpetually be generations behind hardware wise because they don't have the talent for state of the art visuals nor do they want to hire anyone to produce them.

bait bait bait

fuck this site

Fuck anime, fuck Aonuma and especially fuck what Nintendo thinks is good.

>Why can't Zelda be more realistic like Twilight Princess
What Zelda is unrealistic?
>Why can't Nintendo just make a regular, powerful console
Because you don't need power to make good games? X1 and PS4 are powerful and yet they get some real shitty games released on them regardless...

And making yet ANOTHER X1/PS4, both of which are already very similar to one another? That's pretty boring for this industry.

>And making yet ANOTHER X1/PS4, both of which are already very similar to one another? That's pretty boring for this industry.

Amen. And we should take this argument all the way - Nintendo should stop designing hardware altogether and go 3rd party.

...

Super Smash Bros. 5, coming to an iPhone near you. I can't wait.

>Amen. And we should take this argument all the way - Nintendo should stop designing hardware altogether and go 3rd party.
But that would mean less choices in the hardware space...

Given their actual situation you know they would go full mobile, right?

>Given their actual situation
what?

This. So much this.

>And making yet ANOTHER X1/PS4, both of which are already very similar to one another? That's pretty boring for this industry.
But the New 3DS is okay?

I'm sure Sony and MS would let Nintendo release their Super Mario Smash thing on Playstation and Xbox. Not to mention PC. Can you imagine how much better Breath of the Wild would be on PC?

>What Zelda is unrealistic?

>you don't need power to make good games

This meme needs to stop, and a reason why Nintendo is a joke

...

it huts me too

I said industry, not nintendo. Reading comprehension, senpai. I think it's a shitty practice, but all companies do it.

Nintendo's choices in the hardware space haven't really been viable since Wii

It probably wouldn't? I mean, they work with one set-in-stone architecture for which they own absolutely all specifications (and can ask the designers directly how things work). Third party Nintendo would have less quality software

Seeing how the best games of all time were made over a decade ago, its no meme.

But user just said it, another console would be pointless.

dont worry user they just mowed the lawn

It's current year.

>massive nostalgia goggles with extra supply of grandma's cooking scent
>everything in the modern day is shit, the past was sooooooo good

That's Nintendrones for you.

>But the New 3DS is okay?
Sure, I guess? Didn't buy one though.

Hey, I loved that game!

elaborate

>But user just said it, another console would be pointless.
Correction: another console like the X1/PS4 would be boring.

Most games these days are very generic and boring because of the large budget for making a game, great games like Bloodborne are an extreme outlier in today's industry.

>Correction: another console like the X1/PS4 would be boring.

It would be much more exciting and fun than whatever the Wii U was.

>>Pick a new game
>10 or more minutes of intros and cutscenes before you can even control your character
>The game takes control from you all the time
>DLC
>Day one patches

>>Pick an old game
>Just go straight up to the game
>Game just lets you play
>No DLC
>Most games were not broken messes that needed day-one patches

Sounds like the past was pretty good.
We got lots of amazing games, but 99% of waht we see every year is just crap

>It would be much more exciting and fun than whatever the Wii U was.
But not as exciting as a Switch

Most games back then have also been generic and boring, user.

Waa waa waa life was so amazing when I was younger
>the past was pretty good
Delusions, kill yourself

You just posted a Nintenshit character and you're calling others Nintendrones? Good lord I hope your house burns down with you in it you massive nintencunt shiteater. Fuck you for ruining this board.

>Most games were not broken messes that needed day-one patches
You couldn't be anymore wrong if you tried.

There's nothing exciting about the Switch.

Unless it can pull off 1080p, 60fps in docked mode and get ports of all the big name multiplats it will not

TP wasn't realistic, it was just dark

I'm a normal person who enjoys the occasional Nintendo game, but still realizes they're an arrogant and misguided company with no clue as to what they should actually do and an absolutely embarrassing marketing department.

Kill yourself falseflagging nintencunt

So you admit to being an autistic nintencunt? Lmao drink bleach and die please.

Nostalgia is a sickness and you need to cure yourself from it.

>ports of all the big name multiplats
>another platform with yet more of the same

There's nothing exciting about Nintendo squishing both their "Handheld" and "Home" libraries into one system?

>Most games back then have also been generic and boring, user.
Merely because there were more games in general, once again due to budgets. Think about it like this, remember the output of companies like: Capcom, Konami, Sega, Nintendo, SNK, Square/Enix, id in the 80s - mid 2000s and compare it to their work these days.

>this coming from an autistic nintencunt
Go back to Gamfaqs and take WAHOO plumber with you. Goddamn freak.

This, the 2016 looks better than 2014, even the grass

Less than 100 replies in and the thread degenerates into name calling.
That's Sup Forums for you

If you can think that far, why do you still believe Nintendo should keep making their own hardware? Why does your logic just pull a full abortion when it's time for you to justify Nintendo's poor choice of releasing yet another underpowered system nobody asked for?

>nintencunt
>Lmao
>drink bleach and die

user, do I have to wash your mouth out with soap?

I would kill to get a Zelda game looking like the tech demo.

Wii U nderpowered has even shittters games than the shittiest of PS4/xb1

The bottom one looks horrible in comparison because nintendo designed it to run on that piece of shit toaster

fuck portable gaming, when I'm on the move I'm doing something other than playing games

Stuff a goddamn nigger dick in your mouth you fucking nintencunt piece of human shit. Fuck I hate this place.
XD

Different user here, I find it foreboding. I bet you all the niche shit that barely made it over here that had a small budget won't be able to exist on the switch. Also, not having dual screens sucks ass, it's a quality of life improvement and the switch and WiiU dont have it and they're fucking awful as a result.

Nope. Games were mostly trash back then, same as now. Your mind just phased out all the bad parts. It's just nostalgia.