>Switch dead within a week after launch
Is it game over for Nintendo?
>Switch dead within a week after launch
Is it game over for Nintendo?
It's printing money.
It costs like $100 to make.
there's other titles too, they're not too bad
Shitpost harder
...
Oh shit bad user reviews! Shiggy and Reggie on suicide watch!
>98
omfg that's fucking high
hoping to pick one up if they ever make a zelda bundle.
Mario Kart (most people didn't buy a Wii U so it's a new game to them) and Splatoon come out in a few months. Then in the fall it gets Skyrim, Minecraft and then Mario.
But it's fucking their reputation even more and reducing their community to a niche.
Now post the reviews of SS, TP and WW.
...
I hope y'all know that bad publicity is still publicity.
Marketing 101.
The more you shit post, the more awareness you're spreading.
I'll say this now, though: Nintendo's only chance is The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim for the Nintendo Switch.
Nintendo wrote a big check this time.
>mods deleting all of the broken switch threads
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>Mods deleting rule breaking threads designed for flame wars
About time
>implying anyone will buy a console for an arcade racing
Everybody already have Skyrim, and the game is gonna run like shit.
>Fri-Sat sales biggest in history
So were the returns on Monday.
>Zelda is best selling stand alone launch title
Not hard to achieve when it's the only available launch title
Why do paid reviews matter so much to you?
Those "datas" don't say anything. Nintenfags are just desperate for any game, because Wii U is fucking dead for months.
Ah yes, the eternal butthurt
>So were the returns on Monday.
People are paid to shill on here all the time.
The children on Sup Forums then eat it up and spout console war garbage any person with a developed brain wouldn't give a shit about. Mommy only bought one console for them after all.
>the power of marketing
It's a mediocre game that's being overhyped, and don't even think zelda will be relevant in june anymore, let alone goty contestant
I really, REALLY hope so.
I never cared about Nintendo and I still don't, I just want to see something die.
See:
We want to see you die toi
come fite me bicth
If you could pay to get a 98 metacritic don't you think there'd be more than 4 games that have it?
snipperclips and fast rmx are good though.
>sonybros spamming zeros in fucking snipperclips
pretty sad, honestly
That BOTW user score is obviously bullshit with all the fanboys hitting it with 0s because it's not on a sony system (not that use systems for sony games don't have the same issue).
The review score is bullshit as well though. BOTW is good, but after a couple hours some fairly substantial flaws begin to make themselves very very obvious. It shouldn't even be in the 90s let alone high 90s. An 85 would be far more fitting. That being said, the other far worse Zelda titles that came before it got a score way higher than they should have as well.
>Their only chance is a port of a 6 year old game
And you know it can't run the special addition.
If you average the two scores together you get a more realistic number I think.
Works for pretty much every game.
You can score it 10, doesn't make it a good game if it's mediocre by every players standards.
Switch can barely fun BOTW which is a Nintendo first party (ie polished to all shit and back, which should make it run better) while TES6 is a Bethesda port (ie very buggy and inefficient)
Does not help at all that Skyrim also has better graphics than BOTW to begin with.
>every players standards
The people that have actually played it average it around a 9 to 10
>The people that have actually played it average it around a 9 to 10
delusional nintendokids actually believe this
We had an open poll on Sup Forums and the score averaged out to about 9.
Every person I've talked to that has played it loves it.
I've been playing video games for almost 20 years now, and it's in my top 5 favorite games of all time.
>>>>>in Nintendo history
So what if the PS4 sold 1million units in it's first 24 hours?
Nintendo did alright for itself.