What happened to this?
What happened to this?
Turns out you need some modicum of talent to make a video game. Who knew!
Women aren't strong. Someone tell those retards that they were never used on the battlefield.
They made some concept art and that's it.
They just took the money and ran, didn't even try, the artist who was commisioned those characters didn't even know they were for a "video game"
>folklore
Was this for a specific game or just a general "give money to games with gays in them" thing?
The sad part is, the concept art was actually pretty good. It's just that everything else about the project stunk like a week-old fish
It was for a specific game with no white cis people. which was about as far as the concept got.
They didn't make the concept art, they commissioned it to an artist that didn't even know what it was for.
>last tweet was two months before Gamergate started
they certainly picked a good time to fuck off and run with the money
>i don't know what folklore means
It means your link isn't worth the cum that dripped out of your mothers ass and into your existence.
yes, St. George really did kill that dragon, which must mean all men (or saints? or Georges?) have the innate, and accurately depicted, ability to slay dragons
try to actually read the article next time because not all folklore is bullshit made to entertain peasants, my dudes
Amateurs. They should have embezzled the majority of the fuds and then shat out some cheap garbo game, get 11/10 Reviews from Polygon and Kotako for being so brave and diverse and rake in the money.
Then as soon as interest dies down make up some shit about harassment and announce a full priced DLC on kickstarter.
THAT'S how you fleece the dumb leftygoys properly.
>article
It's a congregated list of every myth, not an "article."
75% of it and more is shit created to entertain peasants. You're charging at a windmill, not a dragon.
>try to actually read the article
It's a wikipedia entry not an article. And which part specificially do you want me to read?
The one where they include a mythical spooky skeleton good from Aztec folkloe as a female warrior?
Or the one about Mulan?
Or maybe the one about muh Amazons.
No but it is all heavily exaggerated even when based on real people. Folklore isn't proof of historical events. Johnny Appleseed was a real person but most of it is exaggerations and myth.
say what you want but I want to fuck this trap
reminds me of my dragons dogma character
so yes
It was a scam
I think the same people behind it tried similar stuff again under different project names, but I don't remember well enough.
ok
now read what i linked
there were female warriors
Do the work nigger. Point out the factual ones instead of just linking a huge list of 90% bullshit. Most of the real ones were far less impressive than you probably think. Joan of Arc for example was basically just a standard bearer and a mascot.
here, let me click a random one
en.wikipedia.org
>She was the youngest daughter of Leir and the second ruling queen of pre-Roman Britain. There is no independent historical evidence for her existence.
Oh whoops.
No thanks, I gave you the link with all of them, you do your own research.
Unless you want to continue to spout incorrect information, that's entirely fine by me, but you'll look like an idiot.
The creator is a massive wanker and a scam artist, so nothing. The most recent thing they did was a 6 second walk cycle.
What incorrect information? That you're retarded and your link is shit? That's empirically correct.
I like this one from his list of real factual female warriors:
>Ītzpāpālōtl [iːt͡spaːˈpaːlot͡ɬ] ("Obsidian Butterfly") was a fearsome skeletal warrior goddess who ruled over the paradise world of Tamoanchan, the paradise of victims of infant mortality and the place identified as where humans were created in Aztec mythology.
Seems plausible, I bet she was a fearsome lady
No, the one from the first post
>they (women) were never used on the battlefield
Oh i get it now. You think you're clever by saying "well, not LITERALLY never!"
Like that's somehow relevant.
how is typing "warrior women" on google being clever?
i'm not clever, you're just dumb
It was always a scam and the stupid tranny niggers all were exposed in a private chat and social media
If dragons suddenly appeared in this world it would be men who would try to slay them, not women.
>woman
I'm ok with this
>LGBTQ
IN TO THE TRASH IT GOES
The Feminist Frequency before FF.
She sounds kinda sexy desu
I am glad that, instead of understanding the point, you managed to take my logic to the absolute worst direction it could go
go study up on Ye Grande Militariee Strategem of Dragonslayer Arthur for homework then, christ, before the illuminati dragons kill us all
I was just thinking about this, it seemed like it just vanished into thin air.
Men do have an innate ability to kill dragons, because we are designed for battle, women aren't.
NO UR DUMB
sounds familiar
>because we are designed for battle
not necessarily against fire-breathing lizards
let me know when you have test cases that aren't myths, until then you're just as retarded as
>needing proof that dragons are weak against cock
This isn't that kind of thread, user.
but it could be
I remember it, when Kotaku shilled it. One of the logs the Gamergate shitstorm was built out of.
>trap
>obviously male
I think you need to up your standard for traps, being the 100% hetrosexual male that I am have high standards in regards to letting the balls touch.
Guess you need to sell your game with more than just brown skin and the gender alphabet.
I kind of like the art style though. Does the artist do other work?
It doesn't matter you mouthbreather. It could be dragons or hydras with regenerating heads, men would be the ones fighting them regardless.
Wow, I completely forgot
kotaku.com
The bias in the games media is absolutely insidious. Calling themselves "journalists" is a fucking boldfaced lie