Do you think the Switch will get most of the third party multiplats from here on out? Like say the new Asscreed, CoD...

Do you think the Switch will get most of the third party multiplats from here on out? Like say the new Asscreed, CoD, etc? So far I haven't heard anything and the sizes of some of these games and their DLC set ups might preclude release, especially when considering digital distribution.

no

Nope
It's simply too weak

no.

>too weak
>too many games take up more storage space than the cartridges probably allow and have patches that'd quickly fill its harddrive
>nobody buys 3rd party games on nintendo systems

no. I think it will end up with a decent library still, but none of them will be western aaa games. I bought it for weebshit on the go, if it gives me that we cool.

There's nothing physically stopping them. The games will come if the market is there.

It can't even run current gen Skylanders or FIFA ports and has to use PS360 ports, what do you think?

I hope none of you faggots puts their TV up that high

But will dudebros buy a console that isn't guaranteed asscreed, BF and CoD?

Why would they right now anyway?

>If there friends don't move to the Switch, then there's no point in buying one
>Already have an established online profile already
>Sony is getting great exclusives and people that love the XB1 probably want to stick with XBOX

So the Son-e-ponies are just pushing this "Overclocked Handheld" meme now?

>Consoles over PC
>Tablets and Netflix over 4K TVs and Blu-ray

Casuals care orders of magnitude less about grafix the totalbiscuits of the world want to believe. Convenience is way more important. The Switch definitely has the potential to steal at least part of that audience away.

>I bought it for weebshit on the go

dude a Vita exists. why do you want to torture yourself with girls in burqua

I'm sure it'll get ass, CoD and other yearly titles. There's too much potential for a portable version. Plus they're already ported to PC so they can just use the lowest setting and port that. Once you take care of assets (which are already done by using low setting PC ones) according to Capcom and Sumo Digital it shouldn't take more than like a week to port it.

I dunno but given the Skyrim commercial, Nintendo is banking on them doing so

I don't think it'll work. Skyrim is already on current gen, unless these people really want Nintendo exclusives, I can't see them dishing out for a new (and overpriced) console for Skyrim.

Lower settings won't really be enough. They'd need to drop the res to about 560p on portable mode and 720p on docked mode

I doubt it's about skyrim entirely in that commercial. It's a branding thing, saying "we have the AAA games now!" which the dudebro is supposed to infer

Nope.

What the Switch will get
-Nintendo exclusives
-many indie titles
-the garbage the Vita got in the past but won't anymore because the Vita is at the end of it's life time

If that isn't good enough for you you shouldn't buy a Switch because there won't be more.
It's enough for me.

Vita works fine for the low budget weeb stuff though. Why would weeb devs risk switching to Switch?

b-but Skyrim on the go

get a GPD Win

I think it might, but the question is whether they're really worth playing on the Switch. The multiplats so far have more or less similar visuals to the PS4, but with worse performance. Are people going to accept this in order to play it on the go or will they just play multiplats on their PS4/Xbone/PC instead?