So are we just ignoring this or

so are we just ignoring this or...

well yea.
User Scores dont count. They dont understand video games like how reviewers do.

Seems resonable.

What percentage of these reviews are 0's from asspained nyggers?

Ignoring scores is always a good idea yes.
Giving a number to a game or anything else is fucking stupid and only underages with no opinion of their own would care

Who hurt you as a child?

If you like the game, go play it. If you don't, play something else. You don't need to make the fact the game has a 7.5 user metascore into a thing.

Just play video games instead of arguing.

yea ofc bro we have something new to talk about mass effect andromeda

tortanic 2.0 bro see you on the chans!

considering it was blasted down by Horizon-kun, yes.
You can't really take a score war seriously when a side has 50 millions potential soldiers vs 2millions.

Have you even looked at the 0s?

Half of them are Sup Forums memes.

Yes.
And we should be ignoring the 97 aswell.

>Most played game on Steam is rated as complete shit

Rlly makes u thing

>game hyped to shit
>sure I like zelda games
>dungeons are tiny
>divine beasts are tiny
>all the puzzles in the game are basically hidden all over the fucking world so you have to trekk miles in any direction hunting for these fucking things to get like, 2 minutes of puzzle fun

What garbage design. Its like everything good about the zelda games was fragmented into a million pieces then scattered in a sandbox and you were told to get digging.

Considering 90% of people don't understand there are numbers besides 0, 1, 5 and 10 and how to review something besides "it's fun 10/10" or "it's not X so 0/10" yeah you should ignore user reviews on most games.

it is shit

Yes. A large amount of those scores are

>Rating: 0
>This game sucks xD

>sony makes a sjw shitshow of a "game" filled with glitches and ubishit open world elements
>Nintendo makes the best game of all time, the best open world game of all time
>they both get released around the same time
>horizon is a metacritic failure
>Zelda is considered the best game of all time since the inception of games
>sonyqueers can't handle the humiliation and bomb the metacritic user scores section

Yup, there is nothing wrong with the Metacritic user score of the best game of all time.

user score never lies

Nah, just salty Sonyfags.
Same Sonyfags getting salty about the PC version of Nier.

>people are still spamming the score 2 weeks later

How do you not get this yet? HOW?
This is basic bitch Sup Forums argument 101.

If both critic and user scores are low and you like the game then scores never matter.
If critic scores are low but user scores are high then only user scores ever matter.
If critic scores are high but user scores are low then it's just microsoft/sony/nintendo fanboys throwing a tantrum.
If both critic and users scores are high then scores are the most important thing in the world.

Been in the media a lot lately how people are giving fake bad reviews for Zelda, not sure why exactly. Got nothing better to do I guess.

It's ok when it's Nintendo game...

Really makes you think...

people rate games 0 or 10 out of pure consolewar spit, user reviews are a joke

>- Related to food collection, the game design around killing simple non-zelda scenery animals unrelated to the variety of Zelda enemies for various Raw Meat items is woefully unnecessary and out-of-place for any Zelda game much less any Nintendo game. This concept was so poorly implemented to even include killing foxes and wolves for meat, in our modern society where both have been domesticated as pets or otherwise crossbred with domestic dogs to produce canines that look identical to their wild counterparts. Whether the player has the intent or not to harm them, they can be killed by enemies anyway. "Eating dog meat" is a gut-wrenching phrase I never imagined would describe an action in any videogame much less one from Nintendo, and has forever irreparably damaged my otherwise flawless opinion of the franchise and its creators.
Sup Forums btfo

Go away sony nigger.

And the only critics who gave it bad reviews were SJW

It's much closer to a 75 than a 97 but yeah of course NINTENDRONES will ignore it because otherwise they'd have to deal with the fact they bought a console for just one mediocre game.

>A system where anyone can review a game even if they dont own it
>a good judge of the game


still salty I see..go suck the semen off Jim's face

What's the percentage of 10's that are from hardcore drones? And how many more are there of those compared to the 0's?

>B-BUH SONYYYYYY
WTF is wrong with you toddlers. Disgusting deflection of critique you have going there.
No shit nintendo keeps releasing the same rehashed games over and over again. You gobble it all up.
Fucking review bait the game gets released and a big chunk of the actual consumer scores rate it to be a good game but not 10/10 and immediatley you think its the SONY BOOGEY MAN.

Fucking grow up.

>Not today

Kek

Meanwhile everyone who isn't a faggot moron is preoccupied playing their games instead of autistically wringing their hands at arbitrary numbers and other people's opinions

>so are we just ignoring this
Of course. Like every review score.

yes

To be fair anyone crying somy acknowledges that nintendie fans do the exact samething, right?

This

Its like nostalgiafagging is real

>98

> muh score
grow up, faggots

they all do it, which is why user scores aren't worth paying attention to unless the site they're on requires proof of purchase like Steam, amazon verified purchases, etc.

Yes we are due to the amount of people that rated the game 0

A true Zelda or Mario title is 2d, it has nothing to do with the console its on.

Then again I simply dont buy all the shitty 3d titles not waste my time giving them 0.

So we agree then ? User scores are trash

Shitposting on metacritic wasn't a thing until recently. Perfectly valid.

A 0 affects the average more than a 10 though.

This.

At least the paid reviewers have the game.

pretty much all games have haters but the user score for botw is the lowest for even other zelda games and other exclusives aren't like this.
if it were Nintendo haters why did they not hate the other zelda games?

I'm probably gonna be called a Sony fan boy but let me just tell you
not everybody who doesn't like nintendo likes sony, i hate fan boyism and its aginst the board rules which most people don't seem to get and its ruined this board.

Stop looking at metacritic user scores.

It's not like it's Steam or something where you can only make reviews if you own the fucking game. Every game - every single fucking title ever - is suspect regarding user reviews on metacritic because huge portions of the user score are mindless drones giving it either a 10 or a 0.

And no, I'm not saying official critical scores are inherently good (see classic pic related), but they're certainly better than user scores. If critic scores are the equivalent of a pile of shit, then user scores are the equivalent of dysentery.

Yeah but there's way more 10's where the user account is either a) only rated this game or b) only rates Nintendo games 10/10 than there is 0's. It evens out, just like with every other metacritic game. I don't think I've ever seen a userscore for a metacritic game that I've strongly disagreed with.

all of you are so fucking autistic like seriously

oh no!

t. PETA

Can't wait for their BOTW parody game. Nothing will be on par with their Pokémon parodies tho

The 10s are actually earnes, though. Anything below a 5 is pure shitposting horseshit.

Horizon deserves those 0 its just western trash


deal with it

>no music
>noarrows
>5 fucking items that aren't actually items
>character even more effeminate and cucked to the point that it sparked rumors that he actually was a girl
>actual girl is legitimately a stuck up bitch princess from a saturday morning cartoon with an amateur voice to match
>literally 20 enemies
>literally one larger shrine copypasted 4 times as a """dungeon"""
>completely empty world 100x the size it needs to be
>link incarnation so shit he actually already failed
>game implements artificial difficulty by making all enemies 1-shot you unless you play cooking mama
>any decent fight breaks all your weapons
>sub""""quests""""" consist of fetching something for 20 rupee rewards or "go up to that mountain and then turn left when your shadow casts west along the river so you can see the destination I should have told you directly to go to begin with but it's cool how you found it yourself huh"
>90% of time spent running or climbing, 10% load screens
>collect pictures
>collect memories
>collect orbs
>collect seeds
>literally NINE HUNDRED FUCKING SEEDS
>make seeds diminishing returns just in case you didn't hate the game yet
>fucked up the """timeline""" even more, once more proving it is essentially an autistic-fan-level theory thought up after the fact for people to jerk themselves over and pay $100 for in book form
>forcing the wind waker island blue shirt once again, because hero mode failed to make it popular
>apparently want to rebrand link to blue
>can't actually look like link should unless you use an amiibo, now for only 19.95
>season pass for dlc supposedly sometime next year but actually probably 5 years from now when the switch U is about to launch

console wars weren't a big thing back then

as mentioned the concurency has way bigger army of shitposters to ruin the user score. You can just chack any of the 0 user scores and 90% of them will be people who put 10 scores to any game of their own platform.

>it evens out

It's the second time i've seen this argument

There's no poetic justice in internet shitposting, people are rating the game without playing it if not out of spite (be it a 10 or a 0), a score determined this way will never be reliable and you're only clinging on it because it allows you to shit on the mainstream reception of BotW

party babyz was a solid game to be fair

guys, it's okay

the toddlers need to shill their system and only game to hell and back to avoid a wii u 2

>console wars weren't big back then

OK champ

>you're only clinging on it because it allows you to shit on the mainstream reception of BotW
Do you actually think I need a metacritic score to do that? I've played BotW and it IS overrated trash but I'd be saying that regardless of whether the userscore was a 97 or not.

>BUT SONYNIGGERS ARE JUST DOWNVOTING THE SCORE

You also have throngs off Ninteniggers upvoting en masse so shit gets balanced out. 7.5 is where it belongs

Wow it's almost as if you take the average of both the user score and the critic score and you get a true representation of the quality of the game.

User review scores are the breeding grounds of autism.

Of course. Everyone does it, the more hyped a exclusive is, the more it happens. That's why user scores doesn't count, same applies to Horizon too.

>Zelda or Mario title is 2d
Based on what? Nearly as many titles exist in 3d as there are 2d games in each series.

Yes, we are just gonna ignore Sonygros raid.

Considering all the mental gymnastics to rationalize a factually unreliable score, yes, i'd say you care enough

It goes both ways. It typically hurts good games more than it helps them though, since if a game is already getting good reviews, you're just sustaining an average by giving it a good review, but giving it a zero or a one has a greater affect on the average.

The moral of this story is that people are idiots and will continue to be so for the forseeable future

The guys at Nintendo of America flew us out to Vegas to get our hands on an early review copy. Great guys, great girls, great time.

10/10 they did it once again.

>game is 8 out of 10
>rating 10/10 is 2 points higher
>rating 0/10 is 8 points lower

There'd have to be 4 times as many obvious drones compared to shitposters to even it out

>brearth of the wild and breathe of wilder wind waker is back-to-back slack copying from old zelda game to try and indroduce a feature once thought ando out to be making a ground beaking revoltionlarly gameplay expertisence. nintenrone switch is not chip only capable to keep a running recorder of all and zelda neckbreakers & mainly to until the end of the game to destroy yet anonther monthly remedy to shine/reflect back on this game for the future. and unveil different varinatoins of treatment like so. the legend of zelad breath of the wealth tries, and fails, too and many offering of maturity as to seem like another trash & move on game.
you know he has a point

To be honest I enjoyed the game but it's really not as perfect as some say it is
I'd give it a solid nothing, numerical scores are fucking retarded you can't assign a number to an abstract concept

Oh user scores are only used when it's beneficial other wise you just say it's an angry fan base for another system/franchise that brought the score down.

What is there to discuss? Literally every negative review is from butt flustered Sonygerians. Every single Nintendo console owner loves the game, fact.

7.5 is a fair score, I'd say. Not sure why people, Nintendownies or otherwise, base their self-worth on the performance of a game put out by a private company with the sole aim of making a profit.

I'm not saying it's reliable but I am saying it's coincidentally more accurate than the critic scores which are 9 times out of 10 paid for. You cannot tell me shit like Skyward Sword deserves all those 9 and 10 out of 10s. No matter what the user score is, when it comes to a console Zelda game, I'm definitely trusting it over the critic score.

you forget that it's about 50 million sonybros vs 2 million nintentodlers. The biased botw shills can't compensate the biased sonybros, that's why the metascore is shit.

>Downplaying the legions of die hard casuals Nintendo has under its command
>Not realizing the majority of Ps4 owners simply don't care about Nintendo or its success

Scales might be tipped one way or another but on the whole they even out more or less.

>There'd have to be 4 times as many obvious drones compared to shitposters to even it out

>this game is shit, it's nothing like the other zeldas lmao
>this game is shit, it's just like all the other zeldas lmao
what ill it be user?
By the way there is already strong proof of sony fanboys voting down the game and if you deny that you're a delusional faggot, see try telling me that's a coincidence

>if it were Nintendo haters why did they not hate the other zelda games?

Because it's only rather recently that Metacritic scores are getting bombed.

your post is pure shitposting horseshit

>7.5 is a fair score
you guys have no idea what is the avarage metascore for big games. 7.5 is fucking shit.

>people can barrage the userscores on Metacritic without anything grading their bias or credibility

Hey retard, of course you can't assign art a number. However, you can use a number to gage how people feel about a piece and thus determine its quality from that number. And it's been shown that review scores have a significant correlation with the quality of the product.

>It's a Sup Forums losing their shit for a number episode

>implying this has anything to do with sony
>implying every single review isn't someone mad that the game is nothing like zelda should be
>implying they're wrong

>Both sides are shitposting the user score to hell and back, rather than just the "opposition".
>Therefore, it's representative of user consensus.

Are you mentally handicapped?

Maybe critics should stop using retarded scores, then. 5 should average, anything higher than that is above average.

That just proves user score shouldn't be a thing, unless you can verify their game purchase.

>but I am saying it's coincidentally more accurate than the critic scores
*in my opinion

>which are 9 times out of 10 paid for
*i assume

>when it comes to a console Zelda game, I'm definitely trusting it over the critic score
*despite perfectly knowing it can't reflect reality. I'm so reasonable

FTFY

>tfw pc master race
>tfw can always rely on my fellow aryans critique of the game in steam reviews as not being inspired by console war faggotry and publisher shills
Console peasants are filth.

BotW is the worst 3D Zelda aside from spirit tracks and skyward sword. I say this as a true patrician with objectively correct taste. However user reviews are still garbage and mean nothing. People are retarded, and that's why hot garbage like BotW is able to become popular to begin with. It's kinda funny that the objective goty has been an indie game three years in a row now. Triple A devs really are just relying on marketing and hype and sadly it works.

Yes, because user scores are victim to fan boy tantrums.

It doesn't matter. People that get butthurt about a game metascore and spend time writing "reviews" need to be gassed. Fanboys are the scum of the earth.

>console wars weren't a thing in 90's/00's
Man you guys weren't around huh?

>the majority of Ps4 owners simply don't care about Nintendo or its success

the casuals don't care about this shit. If you think nintentodlers are the casuals then you are saying that they are the ones who shouldn't care about shitposting.

but hey, you can literally check the users who gave the 0 scores, 90% of them are salty sonybros, that's a fucking fact, not an opinion

Most of those are from users getting mad over things like Diretide