Well, Sup Forums?

Well, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/8MHUlVIJy94
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

25

5 if the elephants aren't going to the river?

5

So there can be anywhere between 2-12 monkeys depending on if the 2 monkeys each elephant sees is allowed to overlap or not

the elephants are clearly walking towards the river too you fucking retards

The hues are here again

It doesn't say that though does it.

30.
6 elephants
12 monkeys.
12 parrots.

30

1 rabbit + 6x2 monkeys + 6x2x1 parrots

nowhere in that scenario are the elephants specifically described as going to the river.

Reading comprehension dumbass

And 1 rabbit

Also
>shcool

1 rabbit
6 elephants
2 monkeys (each elephant saw them)
2 parrots in the hands of the 2 monkeys

11 animals

>1 rabbit

12. Rabbit's just watching, and the parrots are just being carried, not expressly going to the river. That just leaves the 6 elephants seeing the 12 monkeys (2 apiece, assuming no overlap) so 6 + 12 = 18 animals going towards the river.

rabbit ain't fucking moving.

But did each elephant see a different pair of monkeys?

Like said, phrasing is ambiguous, so we don't know how many monkeys there really were, as all 6 elephants could have seen the same 2 monkeys.

it clearly does though you retards
>6 elephants while going to the river

they were while-going to the river

kill yourselves

4

How.

If the rabbit is walking to the river, he could either overtake 6 slower moving elephants that are also going to the river, or see 6 elephants going the other way. You literally can't tell how many of the elephants are going to the river based on the sentance. So the answer is 25 plus however many elephants are going to the river.

3

Rabbit and monkeys.

Elephants are not going anywhere, and the parrots are being taken, not going by choice.

>while going to the river

>12
Whoops, left that in there on accident, disregard that, my real answer is at the end.

1 rabbit
2 monkeys
2 parrots

5 total assuming the elephants are not going to the river

10. It's possible that all six elephants were looking at the same 2 monkeys

it died

I love questions like these because the mathfag trying to sound clever with his "WHO DOES LEARNED SCHOOL LOL" questions, writes the most retarded shit

not enough information

"at least 10"

ah fuck, alright you got me.

4

>rabbit saw 6 elephants while going to the river
>rabbit isn't going anywhere
Jesus Sup Forums is retarded, it explains all the pc cucks at least

Refers to the rabbit not the elephants.

excuse me 11**

The rabbit passed them on its way to the river retard it says nothing of the elephants departure or approach to or from the river.

0
Rabbits are skittish creatures, and would likely have turned around and run away upon seeing so many other animals.

5

1 rabbit
2 monkeys and the parrots they were holding (+2)

the elephants were never stated to be heading or moving towards the river so its assumed they're just sitting around and saw the same pair of monkey+parrot passing by

no you retard, the rabbit is moving, the elephants are not.

>1 rabbit saw 6 elephants WHILE going to the river.
You can reformualte that sentence as:
>While going to the river, 1 rabbit saw 6 elephants.

The only animals that aren't going to the river are the rabbits and elephants.

3

>reading comprehension

>nobody spotted the title
>THE BATTLE OF ENGLISH AND MATHEMATICS
You all seriously need to kill yourselves.

>vaguely describe problem while being ambiguous
>lol math

It isn't specific enough.

"Every elephant" could mean that each individual elephant saw two different monkeys from the rest of the elephants, or that the entire group of elephants saw the same two monkeys. All we know by that shitty sentence is that there are AT LEAST two monkeys. We also don't know if the final sentence means that all of the monkeys are collectively holding a single parrot, or if each individual monkey is holding a different parrot.

School is spelled wrong.

Also video games.

>3
>lists 2 animals

2 animals are going to the river

>past tense in the question
>present tense in the answer
How the fuck would I know what the situation is now when it's unspecified when the previously described events even took place

are the elephants even headed towards the river?
it said that the rabbit said it saw elephants while going to the river

so the elephants arent going towards the river

Stop reading things that arent there. Take the sentence as it is.

I know you've lost practice, this is Sup Forums where nobody reads each others posts, you just infer implications and get mad 24/7, but try

let's see who went to shcool

>Every elephant saw 2 monkeys
Each elephant saw 2 separate monkeys or all 6 elephants saw the same 2 monkeys?

>Every monkey holds 1 parrot in their hands
That could also be saying the monkey has 2 birds, one in each hand, or just 1 bird they're holding with both hands. Then there's the problem of which them are actually going to the rive.

Dumb trick question.

THE

BATTLE

OF

ENGLISH

AND

MATHEMATICS

Let's see who went to

shcool

1+(Mx2) where M represents the total number of monkeys which is left vague

Monkeys, plural, you fucktard

I guess that was the joke...

this lone rabbit sure is sure in a hurry

"Going" has nothing to do with choice you triple nigger.

Quit trying to be clever.

13
the rabbit and 12 monkeys
the parrots are being held so they obviously don't walk

TBOEAM is the sanswer

All these buttblasted retards ITT

>b-but it doesnt say
>w-we need more info

Seriously, kys

missing/unreliable data, there could have been more than two monkeys since each elephant saw two monkeys independently of each other

assuming there are actually two monkeys, 5 animals are going to the river: 1 rabbit, two monkeys, and two parrots. the elephants are not said to be going to the river after the rabbit was going to the river, which heavily implies they were not going to the river. one parrot is held by each monkey because it is specified that each monkey is holding with both hands.

>kys
>>>/youtubecomments/

>tfw me and my 11 friends head to the river one animal is going to the river

>>Every monkey holds 1 parrot in their hands
>That could also be saying the monkey has 2 birds, one in each hand, or just 1 bird they're holding with both hands. Then there's the problem of which them are actually going to the rive.
Not really, the phrasing would be "each monkey is holding a parrot in each of its hands" if it had more than one, the wording on that bit is clear

11.
1 rabbit
6 elephants
2 monkeys (didn't say the elephants saw different ones)
2 parrots

Sorry your reading comprehension is grade-school tier.

6, elephants are fucking scary and spooked the rest of the animals off.

25 if you count the parrots, 13 if you say they're just being carried and not necessarily going to the river

25 you faggot
elephants are chilling smoking weed
each elephant saw two separate monkeys so 12 thirsty monkeys wantin' some sprite
12 retarded pet parrots
1 thirsty rabbit lookin' for a quick fuck

>towards
>Animals
>???
>Lets
>shcool
These people shouldn't be allowed to make puzzles

Not the motherfucking rabbit.

Rabbits are pussy ass niggas

but what about the animals that nobody saw going towards the river?

>It's another "let's deliberately phrase things ambiguously and pretend it's a hard question" thread

I'm going 5. It doesn't expressly or impliedly say the elephants are going to the river, and I'm assuming each elephant saw the same 2 monkeys.

The answer is anywhere between 5 and infinity

Either all elephants saw the same two monkey, in which case it becomes: 1 rabbit, 2 monkeys and 2 parrots

Or, Some/All of the elephants spotted different pairs of monkeys, in which case the number of monkeys going towards the river becomes unknown - mathmatically, the number of monkeys could be anywhere between 2 and infinity.

snakes and faggot ass gazelle's don't count as animals

wud u fuck that rabbit?

Doesn't say walking to, says heading toward. The parrots are heading toward the the river even if it's only because they're being carried.

Wrong, due to the phrasing of the question either the monkeys or elephants are going to the river, not both
Depending on who is going where the answer is either 7 or based on the incomplete information of how many monkeys total there are since it doesn't specify if each elephant saw an individual pair of monkeys or many monkeys

11 animal you fucking idiots

How are people this dumb? wow

The sentence is intentionally built to be a puzzle and then leaves things vague so that the creator of the puzzle can tear you a new asshole no matter which answer you give. Or worse, they're just trying to cause a conflict where people will argue about something that actually has no real answer because it doesn't use clear English.

Kill yourself faggot.

Also

>stop reading things that aren't there

But that's the entire culture of our language? Taking things as they are will lead to misinterpretation the majority of the time. There's a reason texts that are barely 100 years old are still widely debated and analyzed. It's because the English language is ass and unless you go out of your way to make things explicitly clear, it's easy to interpret things differently.

It's not ambiguous, you're just illiterate.

Read a book or something.

$5 says all the faggots struggling with this puzzle were educated during the GWB years.

Not enough information.

The minimum number of animals could potentially be 4: 1 rabbit, 2 monkeys, and 1 parrot. All six elephants saw the same two monkeys, and both monkeys are holding onto the same parrot. Elephants are not specifically said to be going to the river, but the rabbit and monkeys specifically are, and the parrot is forced to because it is held by the monkeys.

The maximum number of animals could be 31: 1 rabbit, 6 elephants, 12 monkeys, 12 parrots. This is assuming that each elephant saw 2 separate monkeys, and each monkey is holding onto its own separate parrot. This also assumes that the elephants are going towards the river as well, although that is not mentioned.

I mean, there could technically be any number heading to the river (above 4), just unmentioned, but I supposed we're going to ignore that.

youtu.be/8MHUlVIJy94

You should be able to solve this

both toward and towards are grammatically correct

The elephants could have all seen the same two monkeys.

>op is a faggot posting offtopic
Well how to do solve this mods?

This

This makes me feel retarded.

11

>how do I count to potatoe

video games

The elephants are implied to be in the same place. They all saw the same 2 monkies. The answer is 5.

This is the St Ives riddle straight out of Die Hard 3 retards. The answer is 1