How the hell did we go from this

How the hell did we go from this

I don´t understand remasters. There´s already the original one, why the fuck would I need a remaster? Just because muh graphics? Useless junk, give me good games that I haven´t already played.

to this

Because there's people like me who hate playing games that look like shit

Well, you're a retard.

... to this?

Different generations

Not everyone grew up on old graphics, and some find it very unappealing

This looks like shit according to Sup Forums but the sloppy animation from the remaster is perfectly okay.

>I don't understand
>helps you understand
>you're a retard

really makes me think

Indiana JONER?

MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS

its 20 years later.
its not possible to play those games on modern platforms so easily to like childs (which is main platform) childs and their family.

just stop being contrarian for sake of it.

its not like they butchered animations or graphics its fairly honorful to original releases.

Coco is playable and they nerfed the unnecessary difficulty of Crash 1. Plus Time Relics for all the games instead of just 3

That sounds like a logical reason to get the games to me

Casual

>Unnecessary difficulty

I 100% it when I was 12. I don't even remember it being difficult and I'm shit at games.

Mario 64 was better than Spyro and Crash put together. Just sayin'

Try it again these days. Crash 1's 100% system is pretty fucking ridiculous, having to essentially go through whole levels without dying just so you can get those Box Gems all for an ending that isn't even worth it. Not to mention not even having the Slide from Crash 2 or 3

If you're so shit at video games then you wouldn't be saying Crash 1 isn't hard

>and I'm shit at games.
If you 100% Crash 1 you definitely weren't shit at games, stop humble bragging. Even Naughty Dog agrees Crash 1 was too hard to be fun for most people.

>I don´t understand remasters

Sounds like you actually don't, because this game is in fact a remake, not a remaster.

If it's so good how come the emulation is so bad? Mario 64 sounds real crucial but not even nintendo fans can get n64 emulation right.

Not that guy but I think this is a weird mix of the two.
The fact that they recoded the whole thing would suggest it's a remake, but the aim is to make it play nearly equal to the originals like a remaster.

Mario fuckin sucks

It's nice to see someone who has just started playing video games.

>textures are so low-res you can see the pixels
That's pretty shit, m8.

Improved visuals for games that you like. Plus possibly being able to play them again after the old system breaks.

A remake is a remake. Plain and simple. Activision might be using the word incorrectly but it is not a remaster.

You're a fucking idiot.

Wait, why this looks like shit?
Fuck, it's bettter than I remember.

Because it's not the N64.

You're right but crash isn't bad. Fuck spyro though.

...

>it's OK when Sony LITERALLY rehashes
>It's only bad when Nintendo puts Mario in a game that's vastly different, but it has Mario in the title so it's a fucking rehash.

Why are children such shit at games now? Have they just been babied too much?

kek

NSMB was a pretty bad "series" that probably shouldn't have been exploited as much as it was. Only DS and U are really worth playing

3D games were always original though. They clearly put more effort into those even if they never sell as well

You seen the streams? These people are mind-bogglingly terrible.

Some people can't get past a game's graphical look, like the faggot that replied to you.

>unnecessary difficulty
Nigga please. I 100% it as a kid. You learn the layouts, you git gud and you beat the game.

Only Crash 1 is unreasonable given the 100% reward and how it's set up. Crash 2 and 3 are perfectly fine, even with annoying stages like Cold Hard Crash

Calm the fuck down, ninten/v/

Was this the scariest level in Crash?

Right, but the 100% is to add replay value to the game. It is meant to be difficult, and that is a good thing. It is incentive for those who have beaten the game to master it.

No.

Agreed. They should have ported it to SteamOS instead so that PC mustard race can also play it, and maybe just slightly increase the graphics. The remaster feels badly optimised.

This has more detail, and color than anything i've seen in the remaster still.
64 is experimental, but jank

>64 is experimental
explain

Z. BUFFERING.

>baiting this hard

I guess I gotta give it another run. I remember 100% crash 1 and 2 but quit 3 because I sucked at the racing games.

To be fair they should have kept a challenge mode that still requires you not to die.

You know what's more cancerous than Crash 1 on 100%? Crash Bash on 200%. I never made it past 174%, at least when I was soloing.