Try to predict what the negatives reviewers and/or shitposters will say

Try to predict what the negatives reviewers and/or shitposters will say

>Open world garbage

>REHASH
>REHASH
>REHASH
FUCKING NINTENDOOMED WHY CANT THEY BE MORE LIKE UBISOFT AND THIER 100TH ASS CREED GAME SINCE 2009?

>MUH MEXICO STEROTYEPS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

IT IS SONIC O6 ALL OVER AGAIN NINTENDOFAGS BTFO SONY WINS AGAIN!!1!!

Yeah that whole "rehash" shit kind of fell apart once people realized that everyone was doing it, and that people in general love rehashes.

the "muh stereotypes" bullshit is the most likely thing.

Oh no, why doesn't someone blindly follow everything Nintendo does and why do they have a mind of their own?

>Other M

Oh boy they took the botw formula and slapped it onto mario.... wow.

Why is that Maoi looking at Mario's ass

The only negative would be purists 64 fags complaining that this isnt a 1:1 replication of 64 and not realizing this is still it's own unique game

That image is so stupid, of course they're going to rehash Gran Turismo it's a racing simulator, there are no other ways to realistically depict real cars.

I guess it rehashes the same characters over and over again?

No need to predict, it's already been happening, e.g. what said.

Isn't the Uncharted sequence reversed?

I fell off the scaffolding 3/4ths of the way to the top and had to start over.
I can't move up and down as a bullet bill.
I have to get all the moons twice to play as Luigi.

Frame drops
Pop-ins
Y'know all that shit from botw which turned out to be lies
Because if you can't find a flaw in something, just make shit up.

>Nintendo game from popular franchise
>Negative Reviews
Choose one

The game isn't out yet, why are you already set on thinking anything negative will be a shitpost?

Is it? I can't tell the difference. Though to be fair I only played the first one.

"Empty" is gonna be the big one

This but only white nonhispanics will care

You're joking, right?

Wow, these screenshots aren't cherrypicked at all.

Fine. MAINLINE game from popular franchise.

And if they weren't, would it really be much different or inaccurate?

Super Mario Odyssey's questionable design choices might have been more excusable if Nintendo had dreamed up a better story. Losing sight of the mature attention to community-based heroism, world-weariness, and “love thy enemy” morality in the narrative of Sunshine, Nintendo rolled again with the premise of having Mario save Peach and beat Bowser. Supporting characters will repeat exposition, and with little variation in detail. At one point, a character named Toad says, “Save her, Mario. Save the princess. Save princess Peach,” and the redundancy of this exchange laughably literalizes the single-minded devotion of the game to a tired formula.

>empty levels

Mystery Dungeon has had like seven or eight games iirc, it's its own thing now. something something goalposts

Don't actual mexicans love that shit

But there blatantly are frame drops and pop ins. Fuck me are Nintenbros this deluded?

>"Not enough hahas."

3D Mario is hardly mainline, seeing how poorly they sell. 2D Mario is the real Mario.

Great job, you can work at Polygon.

For my first Mario game I really enjoyed it, but the story just doesn't make sense. For the final score I give it a 6/10.

I guarantee you this will be in a review somewhere.

>3D Mario is hardly mainline

I am almost certain this is false flag bullshit. No way someone can be this delusional.

No, that's 3 on the right. That's when they go to the deserted mansion.

>open world shit
>there's really only 5 differnt worlds
>worse than zelda

Half the world found something to complain about in the trailer, which was like the most inoffensive, cheerful bait on the planet. They're just going to rip this game to shreds, just for the notoriety.

>open world Mario was never good
It wasn't.

it's nice to see some effort around here

See, the issue is that now that I've played the game you can't really trick me anymore.

Apparently it had issues at launch, but I first started playing it a month ago. Your bait is old and grimy.

The "rehash" argument was retarded in the first place. If you want a game to be different, go play a something else. Mario, Dark Souls, Civ, they all have their own feel to them and are made the way hey are because that's how it's been and always should be. Too much change, and the game isn't itself anymore. When people go about and say "It's a good game, but not a good X game", that's what they're talking about.

New Super Mario Bros., 3D Land/World, and 3D Mario are all mainline.

Just like they did with botw. They will take 10 individual things that MARIO does well and say ten different games does one of those things better.

Not realizing that they had to compare one game to ten others in order to make themselves feel better.

Well, at the same time, you don't want the games to feel the same each time either. That's how you become Ass Creed. You need to strike a balance between being too samey, and straying too far from the series' identity. I feel like Zelda (except for BOTW) did this very well. The games never felt like the same thing with some minor changes, yet they all still felt very Zelda.

>open-ended level design occasionally leads to running around aimlessly looking for stuff to do because people have forgotten how to play 3D sandbox platformers over the last 15 years
>the wildly different visual styles used for each world almost feel like they each belong in their own game, giving the game very little visual consistency
>entire plot hinges on the "extremely sexist and gross" Peach wedding plot

Yet all of this will be confined to a single paragraph near the end of the reviews and it will still get 9s and 10s. Expect lots of "Odyssey does for 3D platformers what Zelda did for open-world action games".

1% open world level
99% shitty 3D world maps

So have I you fucking tard. It is not a consistently smooth experience. Fuck me it fucking shits me off that you can't take an ounce of criticism without considering it a personal attack on your favourite company.

>running around aimlessly looking for stuff to do
All sandbox platformers have this. Miss something? Have fun spending half an hour inspecting every square inch.

Negative reviews will say something like
>BotW clone
>Not 60fps fail
>Another open world meme supporting walking simulator

>Worlds are too large and unconnected

It's fucking stupid but that's what they'll say

>oh man I sure love exploring
>oh look a fucking shri- I mean "level" where I get to collect some money to buy clothes for mario to wear

>Someone used my picture :')

Did you make this thread just to preemptively disregard possible criticisms in order to defend a game that's not out yet?

>Other M is bad meme
You have to go back.

>You still can't play as a transgender in a Mario game

>it's so fucking easy
>I 100% it in 5 minutes here is the screenshot to prove it

son of dob

Jesus, this down to the letter. Screencapped.

>Uncanny Valley
>Worlds are too big, too empty
>After awhile there's nothing to do

>Was Mario Always This Hard?
>Nintendo Refuses To Stop Making Sexist Games
>Is Mario Alt-Right?

I love this image because sonybros always get super butthurt and cry cherry-picked. Eventhough it's not in the slightest.

Well "BING BING WAHOO" is a given.

Yes, it would be different.

>Too many moons, and a lot of them take no effort. Why isn't it like Galaxy??
>wah it's realistic humans but mario is also human
>The controls are hard

...

>When did Mario become Dark Souls?

Kek. Keep shifting those goalposts deluded crybaby.

>not cherrypicked at all
>all sony screenshots are specifically chosen to be as similar as possible to each other
cmon guy, they went out of their way to even have the same car with the same color in the bottom one.
it's not even subtle cherrypicking.

unoriginal plot

>too cartoony
>why is it so weirdly colored
>the open world is borning