I'm fucking sick of the argument

I'm fucking sick of the argument

>there's objectivity in reviews guys!

Just fucking admit that you don't agree with the social politics of reviewers and it's a purely political thing. This bullshit about "objectivity" is just that, bullshit.

Other urls found in this thread:

clips.twitch.
youtube.com/watch?v=RYnFIRc0k6E
twitter.com/AnonBabble

what's the point of this thread?

rollxc

shitposting, do you even summer Sup Forums?

>not running in 60 fps is objectively bad
>having dips below 30 is objectively bad
>having physics simulation in a platformer is objectively bad
>remasters are objectively bad and only to jew console consumers who suffer from inability to have any backwards compatibility
Theres already some objective points.

gimme a good number

rollin

>>not running in 60 fps is objectively bad
False, a constant 30FPS is not bad.
>>having physics simulation in a platformer is objectively bad
False, how do you know the developer didn't intend for it?

rawling

I wonder

Roli poli oli

96 please and thank you

roll x3

Man, these roll images are outdated. Double digits other than 00 don't exist in this board

rekt

Who says that? Reviews are always just the opinion of some dude, their use is to get information about the game (I.e. "There are no traditional dungeons in the new Zelda game, instead small puzzle rooms are spread around the map"), which as long as that isn't distorted it's whatever. The other stuff is fluff (I.e. I like/dislike the puzzle rooms and the game is great/sucks).

You are objectively wrong on all of those points, learn what a word means before using it.

wew

>not running in 60 fps is objectively bad
its a remake of a 30fps so it should run at 30fps
>having dips below 30 is objectively bad
this only happens in cutscenes
>having physics simulation in a platformer is objectively bad
wrong
>remasters are objectively bad and only to jew console consumers who suffer from inability to have any backwards compatibility
I loved seeing the crash trilogy with modern graphics and adding time trials to the first two games is a great addition that offers hours of replayability, eagerly awaiting the spyro trilogy remake now

something with a big futa cock please

47 looks lewd as fuck

Rollan for jar demon

>remaster
It's a remake

rolls for something good

There isn't one. Might as well.

Come on

For a simple cartoony platformer with a fixed camera achieving only 30 fps should be considered as a failure. And yea sure. Devs intended to have those inconsistent physics to "make it look more fluid and better". But people have already complained about jumps and collision not being consistent but because it doesnt matter to your average consumer why would devs give a fuck.

That's not the message of the video and you are a dumdum if you think that.
You are better off finding a moderate amount of reviewers who have similar tastes as you and consider their opinions. This video is mainly about the review sites that got too big and the people who take them seriously.
>inb4 snowflakes who "agrees with nobody"
if you are that well-informed about the whole industry to know how these reviewers are so "scum" then I suppose you, the always right conoisseur can be your own fucking reviewer.

ravioli ravioli
give me a good rollie

rolling for animu porn

re-rolling because how the hell do you fuck slime

To roll

A FUCKING MUSHROOM

rollin baybee

all of these things are subjective man. how do people not see that?

look, you might argue "well the majority of people would hate these things" but that doesn't make them "objectively" bad.

i'm not a very smart person so i don't understand why i can easily see that but many people on Sup Forums can't. people also get mad when i point out that dictionaries don't necessarily list the true meaning of a word, and in fact dictionaries define terms based on how those terms are used. it is how a term is used that defines it. not a book.

roll roll roll

Cmon salamander waifu...

KEEP ROLLING

Running at substandard framerates and having dips below substandard framerates is objectively bad for a 2017 title though.

smdh my IQ is 120 at most and yet i can easily recognize the subjectivity of a control scheme where jump is mapped to the left analog stick and movement is mapped to r1 and l2.

Majority doesnt give a fuck about anything I said.

clips.twitch.
tv/ThoughtfulPlumpSwallowYouWHY

Reminder that Dunkey is a homophobe. Hopefully he gets a lifetime ban from PAX for this shit.

>constantly reminds everyone of the time he's beaten and humiliated a homosexual black man

How can he keep getting away with it?

Rolling, fuck your thread OP

rolling, hope i get good

>technical performance is subjective
LMAOing @ ur life
A reviewer could purposedly jump over those subjects if he wanted to.

youtube.com/watch?v=RYnFIRc0k6E

Something lewd

go

I'm fine with anyone.

There are examples.

FPS maps that are too small and/or have characters just running into the middle are objectively awful. Spawns have to have room and more than a few placements for proper map flow, spawning, etc. ("no bullshit").

roll me