Game has Dragons

>game has Dragons
>they're actually Wyverns

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=z1Ch6N8QT00
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

If you know the difference between dragons and wyverns, you will never have a wife and children.

never have a wife under 200lbs

One has a stinger as is basically an animal, the other is a dragon. Dragons come in all shapes and sizes. Sup Forums just gets triggered that the don't have 4 legs

>game has wyverns
>they're actually dragons

>dragons come in all shapes and sizes
dragons always have 4 legs 2 arms and a set of wings and breath fire and are intelligent. You can't call it a dragon if it has a different "shape"

Admittaly wyverns are very specific too so Sup Forums is usually wrong about both

Jokes on you, i have a GF.

The way I see it if in the game they call it a dragon then then in the world of that game that is what a dragon is.

>muh headcanon is the true canon
They're a mythological beast that changes from one story to another, there is no set way to portray them, ya dolt

A gf is not a wife

Where's the guy with all those medieval tapestries with crazy dragons?

>In their tongue he is called wyverokiin WYVERNBORN

The most level headed reasoning here

Wyverns are one of the many types of dragons.

Tolkien Scholar. Wife of 23 years and 4 kids. What now, sperg?

>game has felines
>they're actually cats

This is how retarded you sound

>he doesn't know

...

All four are species of the dragon genus.

Out of every post here, this one is the most objectively incorrect

>game has dogs
>there actually pugs


Are you autistic op?

Stop trying to codify dragons. That's the exact opposite of fantasy.

>op thinks he's clever
>it's actually autism

>biology
>bullshit fantasy creatures
power level is showing, user

dont call me genius, buddy

Only the European dragon depiction is good, and is the only one that matters

Flying snakes and giant bats aren't dragons

>genus
They're not real and 3 of them are 3 different creatures depicted by medieval Europe. The 4th is an eastern reimagining

>genus
jfc talking about dragons like an actual animal. so much autism

But wyverns are dragons?

Your post said they have 6 arms, the traditional amount is 4, no?

How much do you get paid being a "Tolkien Scholar," you faggot fuck?

>opposite of fantasy
Okay, none of them are dragons. They're fish, why are people labeling them dragons when it's just fantasy and we can call them whatever we want?

Besides the obvious size difference, dragons dont have poisonous stingers and animal intelligence

>Flying snakes and giant bats aren't dragons
Exactly, flying fire breathing snakes are Wyrms and giant scaly bats are Wyverns

Maybe in the same family, but definitely not the same genus

I'm not him

Really?

you sound like the kind of fella who reads every journal and listens to every audio log in a game, and writes an extensive post on their wordpress blog about plot holes.

>game has dragons
>theyre actually just anime girls

Shit, someone better call the Pope so we can update him, since St. George killed a wyvern, not a dragon.

>Game has anime girls
>they're actually dragons

>DnD autists trying to rewrite real life mythology again

@everyone

A barbed tail does not necessarily make it venomous (not poisonous).

Reading every journal in a game is laudable and shows you care about the game enough to be immersed in it.

You probably skip every cut scene and play assfaggots and fps's primarily

hilarious and original

>game has actual dragons
>they can morph between anthropomorphic or dragon form

>thinks Christian mythology is the canon dragon
You know they repurposed irish folk lore right?

Aren't wyverns a type of dragon? Or have they always been in a different category?

All Wyverns are Dragons
Not all Dragons are Wyverns

>real life
>mythology

Wyverns are the retarded cousins of Dragons.

Ah i guess you're right, my dnd was showing with that poison bit

>Aren't wyverns a type of dragon?
yes

>Admittaly

Did I stutter?

>anime has dragon girls
>It's really just normalfag trash for facebook faggots to like ironically

WHERE

It's just the only way that makes sense. Dragons aren't a thing owned by one piece of media, so I feel like who ever uses them can make them look however they want.

do you go thread to thread looking for spelling mistakes to green text with an anime girl?

>game has nazis
>they are the bad guys
Why do games keep rewriting history?

What real life mythology do you refer to friend? How is it different than "not real life mythology?"

There has to be some consistency across media, like with vampires. Otherwise you could just have a regular sized poodle and call it a dragon.

I fucking called it lol

I do actually. It makes me feel superior. I also hope to make others feel inferior if possible.

Does your browser even have spellcheck?

>game has nazis
>Nazis have developed the most advanced technology
>Robot hitler

You're a fucking idiot who thinks reading is, here's one free (You)

I bet you voted for drumpf

Then where would spyro the dragon land on this scale

>everyone on Sup Forums is american
Nice meme dude!

Why should i bother? This is a mongolian photo board, not a peer reviewed study

Don't fucking nitpick you know perfectly what I mean

>who thinks reading is,
reading sure does exist, yes indeedy.

>game has children
>they lie to their papa

>dragons dont have poisonous stingers and animal intelligence
And wyverns do?

The consistency is there though. Every game, book and movie that I've seen has dragons as flying reptilian beasts. Small differences like the number of legs or placement of the wings shouldn't matter too much in my opinion.

>Why should i bother?
So you can communicate better with others instead of looking like an underage retard.

Yes, they could very well be fish. Why? Because magic pic related. I understand where you're coming from, and if you want a story that defines dragons like you want, then fine. But don't shit on others who do it differently.

No i don't, i assume you mean Christian medieval mythology and tolkien mythology by real and not real. I hate to break it to you but both amount to the same level of "realness"

One is repurposed irish folk lore to legitimize a Saint (st. George killing a dragon)

The other is in a story to entertain.

Both made up, both the same "realness"

>The consistency is there though.
I believe we, as a society, can do better than just "flying dinosaurs."

...

Yes, a true wyvern would, people also don't know what wyverns are so these threads are dumb

Fat chicks don't count fag.

This.

Your'e fucking delusional, then.
And why is "flying dinosaurs" so bad? Gives you a solid idea while still leaving room for creativity.

Underage because i choose to ignore the red underlined word on a post on Sup Forums? I fail to see the logic

Dragon, Salamander, and Hydra are the only ones that matter.
notable mention to Quetza.

Well not really since the first was believed to be real and was described by alleged witnesses while the other was pure and deliberate invention.

So what would you prefer?

remember this video, Sup Forums?
youtube.com/watch?v=z1Ch6N8QT00

Because dragons have 4 legs, and not portraying them so speaks of carelessness. If you're going to bother having a two legged flying lizard, at least bother calling it a wyvern. It's a cool name, anyway.

>Underage because i choose to ignore the red underlined word
Lack of education and child-like carelessness.

Believed to be real? Its a dragon and a lie at that. The legend comes from a irish legend 100 years earlier

Which one of these would you smooch first?

Salamanders actually exist and have four legs.

This is a wyvern

>Because dragons have 4 legs
>my headcanon is all that matters

Lack of education? The lack of caring could certainly be attributed to carelessness of a child if you want to look at it that way

The lack of education thing makes little sense in context, children know how to use spell check

>Amphithere

Stop making shit up