Fallout 1 and 2, worth buying?

Is fallout 2 or the first Fallout worth getting. Be serious in answers please.

If you enjoyed any of the other Fallout games, then probably not, because it means you have shit taste and can't appreciate actual good games like the first two.

>Point and click shit
>Good

Yes. The combat is bad, mostly, but otherwise they're great. Get the restoration mod for Fallout 2, though.

Got 1 and 2 free from GoG (legit offer not demo)
Finished 1 and it was good for what it was.
Started 2 right after and lost interest.May try again may not.

Fallout 2 is the best in the series by miles.

>brain dead combat
>built-in savescumming
>fedora dad jokes all over the place

>actual good games

They're worth playing but they're not worth buying

The games are clunky as hell and aged pretty badly, but they're still great.

Fallout 2 starts off very boring

first one i played was 3, then NV then 4 then 1 and 2. I can honestly say it's nothing other than nostalgia fags hyping up 1 and 2. It's the kind of game you play and realise how great it would have been back in the day but painfully dated nowdays

I played in the same order minus 4 and I can honestly say that it's not nostalgiafags hyping it up. The UI and combat are clunky, but it's perfectly fine otherwise.

That b8 does look pretty juicy

1 is good.
2 is good.
Both are worth playing at least once.

Yes, they are.

>buying games that were made by a developer that no longer exists

Pirate those fuckers, OP, don't give any money to whoever bought the rights for games they didn't produce

...

The story and lore are top notch. Something later fallouts could only hope to achieve but i personally struggle with combat systems as seen in fallout 1 and 2.
I don't see how people can enjoy something so basic nowdays but i suppose I'm hypocritical as i could easily replay the old final fantasy games without understanding how people would find them dated.
Somehow i just totally missed the fallout train untill later, again, great games but something i would be more likely to play as a time killer rather than a big game to get stuck into

...

Sure the combat's bad, but what the game does well, it does so well that it's easy to overlook the poor combat. I assure you that when you see someone praise F1 and 2, they won't be singing the praises of the combat, but that doesn't change the quality of the quests, world or writing.

They're filled with design choices that are frankly pretty painful to put up with these days but the truth is if you want choice and consequences in an rpg they're still much better than modern games, the only ones that even come close these days are all the nostalgia fueled shit on kickstarter.