...
Games only you like ITT
Just "beat" this game today. Not horrible but very flawed. Had to watch the bonus ending to be satisfied after watching that shitty ending.
i like the sound design and graphics but the campaign is kinda boring and i didn't get to play the multiplayer
the story was fun cause of Kevin Spacey
people shit on these games but I enjoy them despite their jankyness.
never seen Sup Forums talk about this game or give it any praise what so ever
I feel like the exos actually made the game better.
Killing someone was easier since Ghosts, so having to control aerial movement was actually a good idea.
It also had many fun maps too, especially that one in South Korea.
Too bad the CoD “community“ is full of autistic tards who don't like a gameplay change every so often
you could tell the story was butchered during production. god damn, what a missed opportunity that game was.
>cod community hates gameplay changes
>everyone else hates cod for never changing
One of these groups is wrong
>playing cod for the story
The multiplayer was crisp. But the better question is, was Blops 3 better?
Is this bait?
yes
>friends get excited about AW
>I buy it
>none of them do
>one year later
>"hey you should get BO3 we all have it :^)"
AW was better
Fable 3
I honestly can't understand why people shit on SE.
It's a fun game with a nice setting
There have been a lot of changes since Black Ops.
The problem with yearly releases is that outsiders look at it and think it's exactly the same.
But trust me, if you've ever played the shit out of yearly released game series, you notice the differences almost immediately
I keep seeing shit about Sudeki these last couple weeks
Looks like (((someone))) is trying to psy ops me into playing it
>tfw Infinity Ward copied the HUD of MW2 to MW3 and nobody cared
>now tards are getting upset for IW having the Ripper and G18s, which were both good guns respectively
The best thing you can do is to not listen to the community. CoD went from sqeakers to “muh old game remaster“ autists
I would have liked it had the matchmaking not been fucked.
Is that not a series staple?
Every time I play Black Ops III, I either get placed on a team opposite a bunch of Prestige 10 assholes, or it forces me to join games in progress with my team getting absolutely stomped.
Best COD in years. Adding a movement system did wonders for the game. Too bad casuals thought it was shit, even though COD is already casualized beyond belief.
Would you say the Gold Edition is worth $22?
Unironically asking, what's bad about that? If you sweat enough, you'll easily won't go under
AW was something like a better Ghosts imo.
The normal move set paired with only being able to take two shots before dying was a turn-off for me.
The story was good though
It's bad when you're trying to complete a daily/weekly contract that requires wins.
I liked the story and if the multiplayer would've launched with the "Legendary" game mode variant I would've stuck around a but longer.
user, I like it too. It really made the series fun again by adding new movement mechanics and turning it into an amazing clusterfuck of everyone moving around the map at the speed of sound.
Then BLOPS 3 ruined it by making movement slow and removing the double jump.
Never played the weekly contracts lol.
They were mostly retarded shit
Ordered this a few days ago. It's arriving today.
Let's see if it's as bad as everyone wants me to believe
Haven't played it myself, but I've heard you get shot in the back in multiplayer a lot. Same shit happens in Black Ops III all the time, so I'm not surprised.
This also happened a lot in MW3.
A reason why I still don't like MW3 as much as CoD 4
Nuk3town is a total goddamn clusterfuck.
At least with BLOPS 3 I can get relatively stable games. AW is just unbearably laggy every other game.
...
I get pretty bad lag on about a third of my matches. I switch lobbies, get put into a match the team is already losing, play a fresh game or two, and the cycle begins again.
What happened to this game?
It got reasonably good critiques, but somehow no one's talking about it
That post, yes, but honestly the reception these days is half and half. You either have a soft spot for the game because you played it back in it's prime, OR you try to play it for the first time because maybe you just got into the Elder Scrolls, or maybe Skyrim got you interested in it and you want to try the older games.
The latter was my case, and don't get me wrong, I don't mean to shit on people's nostalgia, but fucking hell the game didn't age well. Specifically the combat system is ass. Give me Skyrim combat any day, at least I can click my mouse and hit something with it, rather than keep missing and lose half my health before I kill one sickly cave bandit.
Not him, but it felt too big for me so I uninstalled. Good game Id say but I played for 6 hours and felt like I was in the tutorial still
I started playing TES with Skyrim/Oblivion at the same time and I think Morrowind's combat is _____ok____
I'm surprised more people don't talk about it, what with the Nemesis forge update being so recent?
Been looking more into Shadow of War lately, and personally I like the upgrades and changes they're doing. Especially the whole "befriending" the Orcs and Trolls part.
Hey if you can get past the whole nature of Morrorwind's combat mechanics, then by all means enjoy the game. I can't get past it without frustration, along with other things.
The last time I made a big attempt, I couldn't even SELL to a vendor because I picked up skooma and moon sugar from a random bandit hovel. Didn't even INTEND to sell it, but she didn't want any of my business because it was just in my pocket.
Shit's ridiculous.
It was alright, nothing too bad to criticize it on and nothing too phenomenal to be noteworthy. It's a neat bargain bin pick and that's about it.
Outside of Sup Forums, no one praises mgs2 much. I like the replayability in this game, and Snake Tales is pretty fun. Id love it more if it had the subsistence camera tho