Just came across this video on YouTube. What do you guys think of it? No, I'm not shilling the video...

Just came across this video on YouTube. What do you guys think of it? No, I'm not shilling the video. I'll greentext the main thoughts of the video so you don't have to watch it. Personally, I think it's possible but then again, Capcom's incompetence knows no bounds.
>MHWorld not on Switch
>MHXX not being localized even though it's vanilla base game was
>No Megaman or Disney collection for the Switch
>Only a shitty USF2 overpriced game that was sent out to die
youtu.be/SGSnMvGypN8

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=HWy2vOe-z3o
twitter.com/dystify/status/832944337436758017?lang=en
youtube.com/watch?v=3NskD8SU8Po
youtu.be/wKNpPYhnmAk
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Sounds to me like Nintendo toddlers got absolutely assblasted and made up some tinfoil hat conspiracy theory.

>By far the best selling console of the generation
>Biggest install base
>All developers want to make games for it
Really bakes your train drink...

That really gets my pistachios germinating. Hmm...

Basically this.

and what's funny is that it wasn't even a secret when Nintendo got deep in bed with Capcom for exclusive Monster Hunter games last gen, but drones only lose their shit and start crying about cancerous business practices when Sony gets a multiplat.

>MH games didn't sell at all on PS home consoles
>They only started selling well on handhelds
>Sony shit the bed with Vita

>Sony shit the bed with Vita
The Vita died because it didn't have Monster Hunter, it is a system seller in Japan. Not the other way around.

>people honestly think sony doesn't pay people off

Sony does this shit all the time, look at how many games have time locked DLC or some shit on the PS4

However, anyone who thinks Sony paid Capcom to not release MHXX over in the west or some shit is a fucking retard. MH's main audience is in Japan and Capcom has NEVER been fucking timely about releasing MH games over here. We usually don't get a localization announcement until well after a game has released in Japan.

No, the Vita died because they charged completely fucking asinine prices for proprietary memory cards.

>MH coming to Xbox and PC
>"SONY PAID THEM OFF"


Jesus Christ this fucking board is insane.

I think it died because of memory card thing.
Also, Nintendo showed that you don't need MH to sell systems in Japan. Look at Splatoon. Are you telling me that Sony is creatively bankrupt?

Only thing sony paid for is sfV

Sony isnt worried about Microsoft of PC.

>Not coming to Xbox(understandable) and PC(huge red flag) in Japan
>Shown off at Sony E3
It's clear that Sony doesn't care about MS but they do care about Nintendo

>Also, Nintendo showed that you don't need MH to sell systems in Japan. Look at Splatoon.
Is Splatoon on 3DS?

> Series that sells spectacularly on handhelds
> Claim to fame is the local multiplayer
> Has a history of not doing well in the West and on home consoles
> Only recently broke a million units in the West on the 3DS by Nintendo and Capcom's combined marketing efforts
> Newest installment not on the Switch, a handheld that can output to the TV out of the box

Really fires your neurons there.

Nioh, Spiderman, Destiny DLC, the last 4 COD DLCs, Battlefront DLCs, Umbrellla Corps say otherwise.

That doesn't matter at all. Sony would not have spent money and then let it be released on other systems. Nintendofags are delusional, and your Sony boogieman bullshit is so fucking real it hurts.

Some say this is bullshit
So what is the real reason?

Do you realize how much money Capcom would be leaving on table by not releasing it on a Nintendo handheld? Sony can't afford to pay that much so they had to make leeway somewhere and allow a release on Xbox and PC.

>triple AAA game comes to all major platforms
>except the switch

Gee user, what do you think?

I am talkimg about capcom numbskull

Nintendo hasn't gotten major third party multiplats since the gamecube

Newest installment is also the most far fetched from the series with the main selling point it being made for westerners in mind. Wow, hire me as an analyst, really took me years of research to combine all the pieces together

Then what is with the shit tons of "EXCLUSIVE DLC". You know its true. Your so far up Sony's butt, you dont know that they are actually in yours.

...

Is splatoon on the ps4?

The PS4 is one of the best selling consoles of all time, and combine that with xbox and PC I really don't think capcom is going to lose sales.

The switch cannot run MH World, which us why they are releasing that ported MH on the switch instead.

>>No Megaman or Disney collection for the Switch
This if anything is what I find weird.

>>The Switch cannot run MH World
>Implying the switch can't run on MT framework

>He thinks World will greatly outsell the 3DS games.
You're in for a rude awakening. How much did Bloodborne, NiOH and DS3 sell again? Just because it's out on everything doesn't mean it'll sell.

No fucktard, you're so far up Nintendo's ass that you can't see that the switch is to weak to run it.

Did Nintendo pay off Capcom for a Monster Hunter exclusive deal and to cancel Portable 3rd localization?

That's the point, faggot. Even with money all they can do is get "EXCLUSIVE DLC" or even more funny one "TIMED EXCLUSIVE". All their actual exclusives come from their studios or studios that always have been making games for Sony. No publisher in their right mind would make a multiplatform game non-exclusive to one platform, especially such a prominent one as Swich, just because Sony told them to. Even with lowest of the low sales it will probably get them more money than Sony can pay.

why would sony give a shit about switch

they're already back on top and more than that selling twice the numbers switch is despite the latter being newer

Wow, you'd think that World was looking like Horizon Zero Dawn , the way people are talking about it's graphics. Looks like a late PS3 title.

There were german market rumours earlier about not mention or no offers on any third-party games of the nintendo WiiU on any brochures.

BotW alone runs better physics, a bigger world, and better AI than World, all it needs is a simple downgrade.
Hell, you could probably get World running on a N3DS with enough of a downgrade.

>VGChartz

>p-puhlease keep downgrading games so i can play them on my shitty handheld meant for toddlers

>being so fucking stupid you miss the entire point

If Sony paid off Capcom, then no MH games would be released on the switch, which SURPRISE, there is one. And in no way did I say that it would outsell Worlds, but keep projecting

Kek, it can't even run Zelda user

#4THE900pSub30fpsPlayers

Yes, they did.
Now answer OP's question.

MHXX is just a port of the 3DS title. It will be interesting to see if Switch gets any more after that.

Zelda runs at 900p with sub 30 fps, what are you even on

yeah...
that's what he said

not just that, devs and hardware manufacturers do have deals.
Look at the dead rising stuff for xbox.
Xbox would have payed capcom to keep it exclusive rather than capcom pay xbox,
same with SFV and PS4.
this type of shit happens all the time.

Eh. He used that game hastag that sony uses so I assumed he was trying to take a jab at them.

We're not in March 3 anymore. The performance has greatly improved after couple of patches. Come up with better lies.
youtube.com/watch?v=HWy2vOe-z3o

I think that Switch is an underpowered piece of shit that can't handle MHW.

MH:W is a spinoff to appeal to Western gamers with more cinematic graphics. While I think the Switch could handle those graphics if they really tried (the PS3 probably could, Switch is almost twice as powerful as PS3 at worst, almost 4x as powerful at best), that would also probably take a lot of expensive optimization which the new, and therefore small, Switch install base just wouldn't support financially.

So MH:W not being on the Switch isn't conspiracy-level yet. It's just a sound business decision.

MHXX not being localized makes sense in the context of MH:W.
1) It would confuse consumers. MHXX and MH:W are designed to appeal to two different target audiences. If a casual buys grind-fest MHXX, they'd probably think bad of MH:W for it.
2) You don't want one game cannibalizing the other.
Therefore, you'd stagger the releases. MHXX localization on Switch might be announced and released a year after the release of MH:W.

Again, sound business decisions, not conspiracy-level yet.

>it's 30fps sometimes

Wow, good for you, toddlers

The fuck has the wiiu and splatoon to do with handheld gaming?
The argument was that monhun is a huge system seller in the handheld market for Japan, sonny dropped the ball in not securing it (and other capcom games like usfiv) for the vita because of a petty missargument

Also if you really want to compare both consoles, the vita outsold the wiiu

Any facts to back up the argument that Switch can't run World besides shitposting?
Here is mine arguing otherwise. twitter.com/dystify/status/832944337436758017?lang=en

>having to downgrade games already released just so your system could run it

Damn, sure showed me user.

>Is 30FPS 99% of the time
>sometimes
damn, sondarkies really putting in the work on the shitposting

But they never buy any exclusives. Face it, it's a call of duty/FIFA box

Why would anybody need to watch a video to come up with that theory?
I mean, I don't personally buy into it, but all of those points are things everybody knows already. It doesn't take a genius to put everything together and formulate a theory. It's basically the first thing that crossed my mind as soon as they revealed MHW.

>MHWorld not on Switch because Sony pay off Capcom

what kind of retarded logic is this, capcom are backstabbing jews pure and simple, they jump to whichever is the most popular ship as soon as they can, which is exactly why the main series went to 3DS in the first place.

did Nintendo paid them to do it too? fucking nintenddrone retard.

Its not fucking exclusive though! Holy fucking kek

remember when toddlers claimed that 1080p/60fps should be a minimum and the industry standard?

Good times :)

This, the only reason I never bought a Vita is the memory cards.

When? Can you give me a source?

>"I have no idea what PS3 graphics even looked like"

All the more reason why people won't buy it

Nice twitter, faggot, I can retweet you if you will retweet me.

hmmm...kind of like the idea that Nintendo is purposely limiting supply of the Switch to drum up hype?

oh no, that's definitely real, right?

neck yourself, sony nigger

>spinoff

Guess thats why no ones buying the switch then

Top is Xbox One, bottom is Xbox 360. I'll let you figure out why I posted this. It's a 3rd party games just like MHWorld.

youtube.com/watch?v=3NskD8SU8Po
It's Uncharted 3 on PS3 level graphics. Which, to be fair, pushed the PS3 graphics to its limits and took a lot of expensive optimization, but the Switch is almost 2x as powerful as the PS3 at 32fp, almost 4x as powerful at 16fp.

no one is buying a switch because they literally can't

Where's the Shitch version?

Seething.

One more. We are reaching the diminished return level in terms of graphics.

sony would never do this..
>street fighter V
i mean... uhhh....

It's just eternally assblasted Nintendies mad that companies are passing over the Switch for install bases that are guaranteed longterm money, rather than short term flash in the pan money.

MH especially stings because it was Nintendo 'exclusive' for a long time and now it's not, and they're not even getting the very last MH game they're going to ever have on a Nintendo system in english. Double slapped.

Damn, Sony fans must LOVE buying quality exclusives like Bloodborne and NiOh, right?

Sorry kiddoes, but rebranded Leapfrog tablets don't get to play actual games
Maybe Nintendo will grace you with Super Mario Run Switch edition sometime soon hmm? Seems like a better fit for your faux toy tablet doesn't it?

>did Nintendo paid them to do it too?
Actually they did.

>published Tri and 3U in EU and Australia
>physically distributed Tri, 3U, and 4U in all regions outside of Japan
>marketed all of them heavily
>literally five Nintendo Directs devoted to Monster Hunter games when no other third party IP could even get one
>limited edition consoles, new peripherals, etc

Also remember that MH3U and MH4 were revealed as Nintendo exclusives two weeks after P3rd HD came out in Japan. Capcom jumped ship to Nintendo when P3rd was still in development, before the alleged P3rd localization dispute, and before the Vita was released. Really gets the neurons firing huh

This is the best comment in the thread. Why the fuck do nintendoshills only open their mouth at "corruption" now?

There is no evidence to support it and it seems illogical for Sony to blank out Nintendo and nothing else. And let's not forget that Nintendo did it first.

Actually, I do. Bloodborne and Nioh are great.

So basically no big time publishers want to support Switch with anything worth a damn? What a surprise
>release terrible hardware
>get no games
It's almost like this very thing has happened with this very company... more than once before.

>release terrible hardware
>get no games
sorta like ps3 starting life and the cell processor. if the switch can hang in there they might have more games 3 years down the track but for the first few they gonna be relying on first party or some really dedicated 3rd party games.

>It's almost like this very thing has happened with this very company... more than once before

2nd/3rd parties got burnt hard after the events of the Wii when literally nothing but 1st party games sells on it despite it having a huge player base.

Nintendo maintains its cocky attiude when they are introducing the Wii U because they are still somewhat riding on the success of the NDS, Wii and 3DS, they thought they can get away by doing whatever shit they want with the hardware and developers will just have to take it up the ass or risk losing a huge playerbase and they got totally BTFO'd.

Yeah, that's true. But it's hard to compare since the PS3 wasn't so horribly underpowered. It's more akin to the WiiU than PS3 to Xbox360

>comparing the PS3 to Wii U/Switch levels of bad when discussing terrible hardware

the PS3 is harder to develop yes, but at least they don't have to actively downgrade the games because their hardware simply can't handle the game.

>if the switch can hang in there they might

just like how nintendrrones on this board said for the Wii U right? but to be fair at least the Switch is doing far better than the Wii U for the time being so the possibility of it getting better over the years is far higher than that of the Wii U.

>brother has it on Xbox360
>watching him play
>runs at sub 25fps half the time
>Play on my PS4
>constant 60fps half the time, 50fps or higher all the time

You're forgetting the framerate. It's ass on Xbox360. It's not all about simply what can be seen in a picture. It's how well it can run and if it has crashes or freezes due to overworking the hardware

>Selling incomplete games that rely on DLC and endless patches
>Selling individual remasters in America, when Japan has entire PS4 collections
While I hate that Nintendo doesn't even try to win back a niche audience, they at least make sure the only company ripping off gamers is theirs.

>"The Wii platform, ten years ago, was so successful and anything you launched on it was selling. Even with some lesser qualitative stuff, you were able to be successful. But that was all changing and you could only sell quality products. We had Mario & Sonic back in those days, and that game was selling so much that a number of other titles could afford to underperform. But when the sales of Mario & Sonic, and the Wii in general, began to slow down, it became very visible that we had to change."
What did they mean by this?

You're forgetting that

>Handheld market is dying
>Switch is not powerful and has low install base
>PS4 is powerful and has high install base which is why it has most potential to have the best sales
>MH started off on Sony home consoles

It is not far fetched to conceive that Capcom did this voluntarily and that it makes more sense. Sounds mostly like nintendo tears to me.

Lying on the internet is bad, PS4 version runs at 30 FPS you fucking faggot.
youtu.be/wKNpPYhnmAk
Also, good thing that Switch is more powerful than Xbox360, right?

fair call, havent looked much into the switch since falling for the wii u (least some games are good) to see the actuall power or how ahrd it is for them to develop for

>Handheld market is dying
Where? in Japan? It's the consoles that are dying their.

The previous tomb raider ran at above that. There's no reason to believe that the new one couldn't, if they had unlocked it. It was clearly console parity bullshit. I have a PC that's slightly more powerful than PS4 and that shit runs 60FPS all the time.

You can cry as much as you want. You're not getting 3rd party games. Nobody wants to develop for Nintendo's underpowered flops.

>Make up false claims
>get called out
>bububub previous games, bububub PC
Nice try, faggot.

It was okay when Nintendo paid to not have Bayonetta 2 on other consoles.

It's always okay when Nintendo does it.

Umm sweety, I know you're shitposting but the first one didn't sell all that well on PS3/360 and Nintendo was the only one to not only put it on their platform but also publish it when no one else would.

Handhelds as well. Compare DS/PSP and 3DS/Vita.