How would you rank these games?

How would you rank these games?

2>1>4>>>>dogshit>>>halo master collection>3

1>2>3 All three were great though.
Can't rate 4 yet.

as chronological

Obviously 4>3>2>1

3>4>1>2

>MP3 is a horrible game

It was worth buying a Wii for.

I think 4 has the potential to be the best yet, just because modern advances in game design, it might end up playing smoother, having better graphics etc

1 > 3 > 2 ? 4

nice shit taste

You're forgetting it's on the Switch.

2>1>3

Can't rate 4, obviously.

/thread

4>everything else because of portability

Are they going to release trilogy on the Switch? Never played a Prime game before, so..

Sorry mane, 2 was too tedious for me

What if 4 comes with ports of the 1st 3?

1>3>2

1 is fantastic. 3 is OK overall but makes many baffling decisions. 2 is miserable outside of a few bosses and the Sanctuary Fortress. Honestly Sanctuary Fortress is probably better than any individual area in 1, but it doesn't make up for the slog that is the rest of the game.

Prime 1 - 9.5/10
Prime 2 - 10/10
Prime 3 - 9/10
Prime 4 - probably at least an 8/10

That would be the most ridiculous release of all time. 3 games + a new one? And they'd have to remaster the trilogy too.

I could see them coming out separately but having a limited CE bundle of all 4 games, but that's it.

Torvus is better than the prime areas as well IMO, hydrodynamo station puts it above

you're right about agon though could have been better

>Sup Forums is rating unreleased games now
Fine, I'll join
1 > 5 > 7 > 2 > 4 > 3 > 6 > Hunters

which is more powerful than the wii and gamecube ever were?

Fuck Agon Wastes and fuck Dark Agon Wastes twice as hard, but Torvus Bog and Sanctuary Fortress make the game more than worth slogging through it IMO.

>le ebic switch is bad may may :^)

It uses UE4. It can't look worse than a late ps3 game