This time is not youtube compression

This time is not youtube compression
Why is nintendo doing this?
Why are they not hiring decent people and buying decent texture packs?
Why are they releasing software which looks worse than KT games from 2013?
Why are they releasing iphone garbage (doing software with ubisoft) instead of partnering the better companies?
Why is Nintendo releasing shovelware like Arms, Mario Tennis Wii U and Pokémon Rumble U?

Other urls found in this thread:

boards.fireden.net/_/search/filename/aww, how cute. they think they're video games/
metacritic.com/game/pc/super-meat-boy
youtu.be/JqHcE6B4OP4
metacritic.com/game/pc/dwarf-fortress
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

stop shitposting, nobody ever gave a fucking shit about graphics in a mario game

fuck you, stop making Sup Forums worse

>This time is not youtube compression
but it is
it is exactly youtube compression

not having a run button is a bigger problem

This butthurt is pathetic now.

I love how this game looks so good that it literally has people seething.

This game will get 90+ on metacritic and sell millions and there is NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT.

So rev up those wojacks.

>You can't question nintendo because their games will mark 90+
amazing logic nintendolife.com

ITT: nintendrönes think Sup Forums is a nintendo fan club

I honestly don't care that much about Nintendo graphics because I already got a PC for that. Nintendo delivers fun games, while the other consoles focus too much on pushing a story with the same gameplay.

Holy shit I had trouble realizing those are 5 different games.

>third person "over the shoulder" cinematically experience

your screen looks pretty good except compression
Make a worse one to shit on Sony
>Nintendofans complain about third person games
>Play 1 mario game every 3 years
>play 1 zelda game every 5 years
>need to beg for indie ports

epic

>Unreleased game running at 60fps on mobile hardware

Why does it look worse than the standard console game? I wonder

I wonder who actually is on the wrong side of the turf, many claim this is nintendogaf but i'd say but i'd say there is clearly a majority, and it isn't sony either, it has more to do with underage having easier access to certain game running hardware and usually they shitpost the most ;^)

Epic scale! Epic open world! Epic graphics! Epic story! Yes that sounds like a Sony trailer.

>>Play 1 mario game every 3 years
>>play 1 zelda game every 5 years

What's the problem here?

tips fedora

Include a forest like area from gravity rush 2 for extra shitpost value

You're really not helping your case here.

As opposed to
>play 5 of the same 3rd person, over the shoulder, slow, "realistic" movie games every year

There's clearly a ton of compression artifacts in that image. kys.

>he thinks playing these games are bad
>also there are BB, Nioh, Gravity Rush, Gran Turismo, Digimon, Yakuza, Persona, Final Fantasy,Ni No Kuni II, Ratchet and Clank...

What's wrong with movie games?

>What's wrong with movie games?

You had no problem when Nintendo and its affiliates did it.

Tropical Freeze, Pikmin 3, Sun and Moon, Kirby Planet Robobot, TMS, Kid Icarus Uprising, Smash, Monster Hunter, Bravely Default, Fire Emblem, SMTIV, etc

See? Not hard to just list games on systems a company makes.

What games?

Who had no problem? And which games?

...

From the top of my head, including first and third party devs:

>Metroid: Other M
>Bayonetta
>Xenoblade
>SMT
>Pokemon
>Zelda
>Fire Emblem
>Kid Icarus

And so on.

>Nioh, Gran Turismo, Digimon, Final Fantasy
Not helping your case.

>PS4 released more games in 2017 than Nintendo from 2014 to 2017
JUST

But none of those are "Slow over the shoulder third person movie games"

>gets BTFO
>start spamming wojaks
Sony niggers know no shame.

None of those are movie games. The marketing department focused more on advertising the gameplay. Take a look at Sony's E3. Each game was marketed as a movie.

:)

How the fuck are any of those movie ga-... Wait a minute, you're ACfag. Nah, not starting this.

>None of those are movie games.

Id on't know. The gross focus on elements that aren't gameplay would argue otherwise.

Nah, Nintendo had a lot more than 3 games in those years.

>Other M
>No problem

Fuck off, ACfag

The PS4 doesn't release games. The PS4 is not a company.

I meant games released for PS4 brother

>The gross focus on elements that aren't gameplay would argue otherwise.

Except if you played the games you'd know this is false you retarded shitposter. Cutscenes take roughly 5% of your time playing BotW.

...

The difference is the game time. You can't just say game time doesn't matter when you're trying to compare games that are like 80% gameplay and 20% movie and say they're the same as Sony's 95% movie 5% gamplay "games".

Oh, it's ACfag. Everyone move on and stop responding the troll, you'll be met with nothing but strawmen and arguments that ignore key parts of your posts.

ABORT ABORT

POSTER HAS CONFIRMED AUTISM

boards.fireden.net/_/search/filename/aww, how cute. they think they're video games/

>Cutscenes take roughly 5% of your time playing BotW.
And the other 95% is listening to dialogue boxes, tutorials like the great plateau, tutorials DURING THE END BOSS (he was already easy enough, but in his giant boar form I didn't need more tutorials) and I would like to bring up the disgusting 30 FPS that pervades the game constantly.

>movie games advertise 100 hours of gameplay, like TLOU's multiplayer and Dragon Age Inquisition
>suddenly they're no longer movie games

hmmmmmm.

AC = Armored Core or Ace Combat?
also, is AC fag the most autistic (and thus the most personified Sup Forums user)?

>it can't have gameplay if it has cutscenes
epic "proof"

>a bloo bloo bloo I have to read dialogue for a few seconds

This is a great reaction iamge

Still, Nintendo had a shotload of good games over those years, and the PS4 has had, what 4 or 5 games this year? That's a good damn year, but Nitendo had some pretty solid years as well, 2016 not included (though I personally enjoyed Sun/Moon, SMTIVA, and Tokyo Mirage Sessions, I am an RPG nerd).

>The gameplay is amazing, but removing the story ruins all of it horrifically.

Somethin don't add up here.

I went from pro-nintendo to anti-nintendo due to wii u so I will always hate every game released for wii u

>buying texture packs

Armored Core. He's one of the old gods of shitposting, be warned.

Armored Core. You should talk to him about review scores and broken clocks, he likes those.

The fuck? Are these actually different games?

Isn't he the guy who spent like 30 hours in a thread saying that every game is worse than shmups ?
I miss that guy. He typed like a meth addict with autism

Sup Forums was never good. I say let it die.

That's silly, it had a lot of great entries in good series, and TMS will always be a blast. Still, I am too tired to argue, but just let it be known that Tropical Freeze is one of the best 2D platformers ever made. Now that CEMU is further along, you should see about checking out the library.

t.cody

Some of us aren't a fan of those games. Sure, you can say you consider Donkey Kong one of th ebest, but it's barely a blip on my radar. It's not even up to par with Super Meat Boy.

>Tropical Freeze is one of the best 2D platformers ever made
I don't know I prefer Super Mario World and games like Strider
But anyway it wasn't a bad donkey kong country game

One of many things he does. He also likes to make a single poat or two praising Other M, then link to it later when accusing others of praising the game when they never did. Or how ALL new games on newer Nintendo platforms are apparently movie games that focus entirely on cutscenes. Just don't respond to him and you will be okay.

Why do nintendo fans take the bait every time

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA

>you can just pirate it all
>"lol, what a shill!"
Fuck off.

As a platforming aficionado, TF is leagues above Super Meat Boy. Get some taste. Challenge alone isn't the only thing that makes a platformer good. You could have at least said Dust Force or something. You don't have to be a" fan" of a series to play games from said series.

You know, you didn't respond to

>Challenge alone isn't the only thing that makes a platformer good.
t. casual

he is right though

But I beat SMB and Dust Force. And have beat iwtbtg several times. The only casual is the guy who doesn't play DKC games because he is a mature gamer for mature gaybois such as himself.

>wanting to hold down a button at all times
for real nigga you dumb

I'm not playing a platformer for the "lore" or the "comfy" feeling. I want challenge, I want my heart to beat. Donkey Kong, Mario, Kirby, etc. They can't offer me that. They're made for the young audience whose feelings get hurt if they die too much.

For 60 bucks I shouldn't get a platformer with the difficulty of a cinematic sony game.

Tropical Freeze would tear your ass in half, and you outright wouldn't be able to beat Hard Mode. It just also has more going for it as well. This shitposting is pathetic.

Sup Forums during eurotime is literally nothing but anti nintendo shitposts. And in those same threads one person dares to interrupt the circle jerk and is immediately met with
>FUCKING NINTENDOGAF

>Donkey Kong
>for children
>not challenging
Nigga go back to neogaf.

>Tropical Freeze would tear your ass in half
the metacritic alone disproves that, with over 65 positive critic reviews. After all, why would game journos like such a hard game? They hate challenge and only enjoy movie games.

Donkey Kong would have a red metacritic if it was even slightly difficult.

If it´s not fun, why bother ?

Graphixfags (especially retarded baiting ones like OP) are the cancer killing gaming

You really expect a Mario game to be photorealistic?

This was during period when Nintendo was seen untouchable, and you just couldn't shit on hyped game like that. Hell, people praised Skyward Sword too.

First off
>Implying anyone enjoyed the shitshow that was Other M.
Secondly
>Long RPGs have a lot of cutscenes
water is wet.
You seem to be forgetting that these games have actual game in between these cutscenes. When you have a 80-100 hour game like Xenoblade or Breath of the Wild, cutscenes don't take up a majority of the playtime. A Movie game is a game where even the gameplay itself feels like watching a movie due to little input or influence by the player, AKA excessively scripted sequences and QTEs.

metacritic.com/game/pc/super-meat-boy

I guess you are right. Enjoy tour cartoon game for infants. Meanwhile, for Tropical Freeze...

>dull, derivative level design
Holy fuck, what a load.

youtu.be/JqHcE6B4OP4

This does sort of miss-represent some games. For example, Last of Us has many segments where you just slowly walk forward while characters talk, which are technically gameplay but have nothing encaging happening. Those bits are not counted in.
Similarly all typical JRPG bits of Persona 4 where you press button for text to advance are counted as cut-scenes, despite having "player interaction".

Challenge + comfy = perfection
i.e strider

>persona 4
>17 hours of cutscenes
>pokemon sun/moon
>6 hours of cutscenes
You might be retarded

Personally, I prefer gamkes like Dwarf Fortress, which don't have a metacritic. Too videogamey for modern journos and they don't pay enough bribes.

>Implying anyone enjoyed the shitshow that was Other M.
Considering the daily porn dumps, I'd argue otherwise.

>When you have a 80-100 hour game like Xenoblade or Breath of the Wild, cutscenes don't take up a majority of the playtime
then why does the story exist period? Shouldn't the gameplay be enough to make the product good?

But Super Meat Boy ranges from 85 to 90 on Metacritic...

>Samus porn started with Other M

Oh shit, bringing platformers into your shit. That's a new one to me, ACfag, not bad. Your earned this (You), enjoy.

Also, metacritic.com/game/pc/dwarf-fortress

8.2/10 user score, casual. You are just a paid Dorf Fort shill like the rest of them.

So it's on you to decide: do you agree with me that metacritic is a collection of casual reviewers, or do you agree with metacritic, thereby proving that Super Meat Boy is better than Donkey Kong? You can't have it both ways. I personally think both are average platformers, one jjust slightly edging out the other.

>not a single """professional""" critic review score

Not enough strong independent womyn of color, or masturbatory aids to bribe them, I guess.

I form my own opinions. SMB is bland as fuck and sells on difficulty alone. It is entertaining one, and that's about it. The DKC games have alot more going for them whole also being tough as nails. TF is 10/10, SMB is 8/10. I don't give a shit about metacritic, YOU do.

So why should I consider your opinion any more valid than Metacritic? One of the arguments ITT was literally "being comfy is more important than anything else in a game". What kind of """special""" individual would think that?

sure it's not cutting edge but that hasn't mattered in years
if the game itself is good that will put it head and shoulders above it's AAA competition

>Why are they not hiring decent people and buying decent texture packs?
Because they don't need to
Nintenbabies will eat it up anyway so why bother?