Do you prefer slow zombies like in Resident Evil 1 or running zombies like in Left 4 Dead?

Do you prefer slow zombies like in Resident Evil 1 or running zombies like in Left 4 Dead?

slow zombies

Depends on what equipment I have.

slow
the point of zombies is that there's a lot of them and they never get tired so they'll slowly surround you and tear your guts out
fast zombies are fucking retarded

Any zombies are not scary, because they are retarded. It's intelligence the reason why human is scary

Why not both?

Have the mass hoard of zombies be the slow bulky types that just creep up on you or linger in "inconvenient" places and then occasionally have a "special infected" show up who isn't as tough and bulky as the normal zombies but they're much more dangerous and offensive and have specials powers. Like the smokers and hunters from L4D.

what are the top 3 slow zombie movies, and top 3 fast zombie movies?

Is this a stealth Ito thread?

I am committed to shambling fantasy zombies.

yes pls

Zombies are overdone at this point and they just keep becoming more ridiculous each time. I mean now they can run, have powers, can mutate, be smart, form societies.

Please do.

No zombies

...

...

...

...

slow zombies
fantasy zombies are much cooler though, killing fat undead hicks has gotten old

...

Thank you user.

...

...

...

...

Getting than SUCCubus

...

Slow zombies can be metaphorical for so many things

Like the ever impending mortality of man, you can run and run but eventually you'll get tired and they'll overwhelm you etc.

Fast zombies are just adrenaline pumping action movie cliches. No time to be afraid because you're too busy running and shooting like its a michael bay flick.

Slow zombies make a game fun by adding an ever present level of danger and essentially a toy to fuck around with ala Dead Rising

Fast zombies are just cannon fodder to instantly shoot down ala L4D

May as well replace them with any kind of fast melee enemy like goblins or some shit

Bump, also, wouldnt fast zombies require more brain power thus they need more energy to survive?

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Slow zombies are boring, the only reason why people die to them are extreme stupidity and because the movie/video game wants the character to die

slow zombies. creepy dread of being followed is greater than a jump scare.

Also this guy gets itSLow zombies when you have a machine gun is stupid.

FUCK

...

...

>KE KE KE KE KE

fug

...

...

...

Dick
Suckin
Lips

...

pls don't be the end

Spookchick seems like the good guy in this story desu, eating mountain climbers who die on their own stupid time to save other mountain climbers who were going to die on their own stupid time.

Few pages left

Slow zombies are cooler, but fast zombies can still be scary in their own right considering you're more or less fucked when an outbreak occurs.

Genuine question about zombies though, wouldn't they rot after a while? I would assume after a winter they wouldn't be much of an issue.

I want a game about making skeletons interesting again.

Instead of just zombies, I want skeletons. Then over time rearrange the parts for different enemy variety and then give them more parts as they're getting stronger. Bosses basically being bone golems and stuff. That'd be rad.

...

The thing with zombies is that realistically they would stop functioning really fucking fast because they start rotting right away and don't heal.

which one Sup Forums

>slow zombies, slow infection rate, airborne virus with a 1% chance of infecting you everyday - also blood contact infection, zombies die in a year naturally, zombies will try to infect you or eat you
>fast zombies, instant infection rate, infection via blood contact only, zombies die in thirty days, zombies will infect you only
>intelligent, fast-walking zombies, moderate infection rate, infection via blood contact only, can maneuver and manipulate through pathways and entrances and strategize, zombies will only try to eat you

so was it a time travelling demon feeding him his own flesh from the future?

>wouldn't they rot after a while?

Yes, which is why zombie apocalypses are so dumb. Along with it being spread through bites 99% of the time.

...

fast zombies
I'm fat and have a pantry full of food so I'd just wait inside for a month

THICC

...

Running zombies can be incredibly good if they're rare and mixed with slow moving zombies and the right environment.

See REmake.
Leave a defeated zombie on the ground for too long and it revives as a running zombie.
The addition of this in the remake made the game a million times better in what they were trying to achieve.

>Open spaces
Running eazy to kill zombies
>Small claustrophobic spaces
Slow but strong zombies

Prove me wrong

>airborne virus with a 1% chance of infecting you everyday

That's really high. I definitely wouldn't want to roll that everyday.

A mix like how dead island did it, cus there was nothing worse than a swarm of infected rushing you after fighting off a bunch of regular zombies

realistically unbreathing, uneating zombies would be dead in fucking minutes at the very most since without food or oxygen their metabolisms can't produce any ATP to perform any of the chemical reactions that result in muscle contractions, the body consumes all the stored ATP in like 1/250th of a day

...

I TOLD YOU BRO

This guy is right, but over all i;d rather be equipped to deal with slow zombies.
I like the feeling of being stronger than them, but maybe not having the means to deal with all of them and having to play around that.

f

>Inb4 he falls down and injures himself

Slow is the best when actually handled correctly. They should barely be a threat in small numbers, they'll only kill someone by surrounding them in huge groups that can't be killed quickly enough.

...

T-this is kinda hot desu.

Wouldnt that make it then to where the only thing to worry about in a zombie appocalypse is the damage to property, potential isolation, and the amount of flies and bodies that need to be burned then?

I guess with bites it makes sense since there would be saliva being spread or some shit, but wouldn't even scratches be harmful if thats the case?

F
Fucking RIP.

Fuckin timetravelling birds, i should've known

Post OP one now

Round two, might as well finish what OP started.

...

RIP.

What would you do if you were him?

...

Not eating my own flesh at least so she kills me quickly

FUCK the bird

I would honestly try to fuck that thing. I don't care, knowing what he knows I'm fucked anyway so just go out bangin.

Wait, is this the one where a shark bursts through the door?

...

The only obvious choice is to kill yourself somehow.

I'm sure anything you could possibly come up with would be way less painful than being slowly eaten alive.

Or I guess you could just keep letting her feed you. She only seemed to go into "ACT 2" once you refuse to accept her feedings.

No, that's Gyo.

Nope, that's Gyo

His girlfriend thinks slow zombies are coolest so she becomes a slow zombie that can barely move 2 feet in an entire day. He thinks fast zombies are the coolest so he becomes a zombie that's as fast as The Flash.

...

Look at the figures they have in the background, they are referencing other stories.

niether. Zombies are one of the most boring tropes of all time.

Although, the unkillable zombie hoards from "return of the night of the living dead" were pretty entertaining.

>zombies with clear chunks of it missing is stronger than a human
>zombies with decomposed flesh outdoing a living human

For some reason I thought it was his sister.

Slow zombies if cleverly placed, so combating them becomes more of a puzzle than action.
Fast zombies have their perks i suppose, in wide open spaces since slow z's become nonthreatening.
Completely depends on the game but in an ideal scenario gameplaywise i would prefer slow zombies with variations and fast being one of them.

...

I'm pretty sure it just happened to coincide that he got all his flesh and then rejected her. How would he keep being fed flesh that never got taken?

oh shit nigga kill her now