It's fucking garbage. I'm so fucking disappointed

It's fucking garbage. I'm so fucking disappointed

>he had expectations for a cod game
you have to be 18 to post on Sup Forums

you have to be older than 30 to post on Sup Forums

My mate and I just finished playing 10 rounds.
Holy shit it is crap.
It controls awkwardly, the gun play is messy, the pace is autistically fast but not in a smooth q3arena way.
The menus are confusing and don't convey info well.
How can it possibly be so bad after all the practice making fps games they've had?
Especially after cod waw.

things i said:
>having expectations for a call of duty game in the year 2017 is immature
things i did not say:
>there has never been a good call of duty game ever

...

When's the beta for ps4? Open beta that is. I just really wanna play some zombies like the good old days

runs like shit on PC so I uninstalled

It is still beta you fucking faglord

I've bought every COD mainline game since Modern Warfare but only for the single player.

As long as I get a good 6 or so hours out of the Campaign I am always satisfied with my purchase. I'll hop onto MP a few times, the last one I spent more than ~15 hours on was MW3.

They aren't bad Single Player games, people just always focus on the Multiplayer aspect.

Sure that's not something like bullet registration? It is still in beta so it could get fixed even if it's not

>Especially after cod waw.
>sledgehammer
>cod waw

You are a retard.

>paying full price for a few hours gameplay

Haha

In todays world beta essentially means launch version.

>being so poor so you can not afford paying full price for a few hours gameplay

Haha

they haven't had any practice, COD is spread among three (four?) studios that develop simultaneously and rotate release schedules. I have no doubt many of the hands who worked on the series have left for different studios, especially Infinity Ward with the whole Respawn and Titanfall thing. and WaW was 10 years ago

I can. It's called not wasting money. Haha

Not him but there's nothing wrong with that. That's basically the price of several movie tickets that would equal about the same amount of time but involve you just sitting there staring. Most games don't have long single player anyway. All your 'golden age' bullshit had singleplayer that could easily be beaten within a few hours, and in a lot of cases were designed to be.

The game looks great on pc imo but, the game is lame and panders to PC&feminist shit

>no swastikas, female soldiers, and black nazis

d d d dont want to hur hur hurrrt peoples feelings

Are you a late 90's baby? "Betas" have just been demos of the full games for almost a decade now

Oh so they're gonna change all that shit in a month or so?
Fucking fan boy tard.

It is called Call of duty.
Therefore it should follow the previous ones.
So they're exempt from quality because they outsourced development to some pajeet code farm?
If you attach a brand to a product then it carries certain expectations based on its legacy.

Thats like 60 eurodollars for 6 hours of actual gameplay if you only play the single-player.
I mean you do what you want with your money but damn

>d d d dont want to hur hur hurrrt peoples feelings
But its hurting your feelings right now

No i liked it I just dont want to give them my money

No. They do fix things. And with over a month til release they can

i managed to play 2 games before i kept getting connection timeouts

uninstalled shortly after

You're wasting money going to the cinema too

How blatant is the WE WUZ kangz shit?

Playing CoD on PC is like playing Counter Strike on consoles.

>they're gonna change all that shit in a month or so?

Respawn changed things in a month before the release with Titanfall 2

The game ships in two months. The Beta is near release status; only last minute bug fixes will be made with major issues already ironed. No game in existence has ever made large changes after the beta without heavy delays - search the Battlefield 2 Beta bugs then for the Battlefield 2 release bugs; the list was mostly unchanged - the demo was near the final release. In game development, the last two months prior to release are completely hands-off for the devs as complete builds are being compiled and placed on discs to be shipped to retailers roughly one week prior to release. At most, the devs will work overtime until a month before release, and if you're Ubisoft, this lasts until a few months after release.

As is, the finished game will not change much unless it's post release in the form of patches. Saying otherwise is a complete misunderstanding of how game deadlines work.

Ironically I'm only interested in single player, since I want a dramatic ww2 campaign with current gen graphics. I hope it delivers

CoD was never good
WW2 shooters are cancer except for MoH

It's a little heavy handed.
At the beginning the announcer mentions women on the front line, and when initially picking your division 2 of the 5are roodies.
One is a woman, and one other is a white lady.

you can play as a nigger Nazi
a Nigzi if you will.

I can't believe they still use the quake 3 engine.
In terms of graphics you can tell that its still the old Cod 2 behind these new textures and assets.

Can and I did.
A lady nigga Nazi.

You're wasting money doing anything for entertainment, by that logic.

>WW2 shooters are cancer
Ever played the New Order or Old Blood?

Whats wrong with that

It's essentially a better looking and better playing WaW and loads of people on here loved that.

Oh lawd, sounds like some campy SJW shit.

In the other hand, playing as a sassy strong Waffen SS womyn of color who needs no Obergruppenführer sounds kinda appealing and balances it out.

Do they even speak German?

MoH doesn't get a pass. In fact, it's the franchise that started this whole bullshit of endless WW2 games by doing that whole cinematic experience crap.

Yet you probably overpay on food or don't cook your own and you probably have someone overcharge you to change your oil and do repairs. Fucking loser.

I like it

I feel like playing the exact same game.
Also those graphics are unacceptable in 2017.

An engine is a collection of development tools with loosely built coding libraries that can be quickly referenced for large portions of code and often paired with extensions for quickly creating or deploying content. Each and every part of these can be and likely has been rewritten - the fact alone that the target platforms use entirely different machine code for compiling requires the engines to be modified on a base level. Using the same tools to import or build levels is fine. The lighting, particles, physics, and etc. have obviously been completely modified for current devices.

Per example, Wind Waker and Twilight Princess use the same engine.

They speak kraut.
Really fucking badly an with a yank accent.

No... you dumb ass. If you're getting enough hours for your money then it's fine.

Hahaha Lmao I've triggered you. No, I eat at home 95% of the year and don't have a car so nothing to worry about

they do, and it's weird as shit hearing the same German lines we've heard for years in WW2 games from a female voice.

>lade neu!

Oh so you actually are a literal loser

>retards like this actually exist

Enlighten me

that shotgun doesnt kill i one hit, what's your point? fucking brainlet

>It's fucking water. I'm so fucking disappointed

MoH:AA is worse than original Call of Duty you blind nostalgiafag.

If it didn't have cod in the title people would eat it up like that shitty insurgency ww2 game. Gunplay is good, maps so far are okay not the best, lacking in weapon variety though. Perks in this at least seem to be reasonable and balanced.

Yes, and each engine have there limits, otherwise they wouldn't make new ones. Idtech 3 can't support volumetric lighting for exemple.
>Wind Waker and Twilight Princess use the same engine.
No shit, they pretty much look the same.

Maybe you should stop being a 10 year old who unironically expects a fucking Cawascaby to be good.
Seriously, do tell, what the fuck did you actually expect?

No, people would ignore it even more because it offers nothing new.
It's boring, the maps are small as fuck, the spawn system is shit and the guns are worthless.
It would flop like all the WWII games of the past years have flopped.
Being called COD is the only reason it keeps selling.

But you objectively are getting enough hours for your money, retard. No other medium of entertainment has anywhere near the dollar-to-value ratio of a video game, that's why video games are so fucking successful in the first place you contrarian moron.

If I drop 60 bucks on a game with a six hour singleplayer campaign, even if you leave out all of the bullshit that adds replayability to it and realistically extends the time of your first playthrough due to lack of knowing where everything is/the best way to beat every level, then you're dropping 10 bucks for an hour of entertainment. That's dirt fucking cheap. You can spend up to twice that going to a movie theater depending on what city you live in and what theater you go to. You can spend more than that on a fucking music CD with maybe 50-ish minutes of music on it. You can spend more than that on a short book.

What podunk town do you live in where 60 bucks is a lot for entertainment?

That's a doubles barrel shotgun. At that range it should. And if it doesn't it basically tells us the game is stupid and also shotguns are useless in this game

... I'd say the bullets not hitting targets at point blank range in your shooting game that you're developing for a market that devours shooting games left and right? Kind've more than a simple "bug".

UPDATE YOUR DRIVERS AN IT WILL RUN SMOOTHLY YOU UGLY ASS KIDS.

>My game has nigger nazis and I HATE NIGGERS REEEEE :RAGE: I'M POLITICALLY INCORRET LOOK AT ME I'M EDGYYYYY.

God no wonder no one likes you ugly ass faggots irl. get a fucking life and stop being so edgy little 4'2 blonde bangs, chubby, cheese breath depressed and desesperate for attention kids.

They're failing because the generation gap has shifted and kids only care about mobas now. The new generation doesn't give a fuck about history and certainly not WW2 other than they want to kill Nazis.

I don't like the game because I got bored of it back in 2007 and they haven't changed shit.
And i'm not interested in being liked, having a social life is job i'm too lazy to do.

>10 bucks for an hour of entertainment. That's dirt fucking cheap. You can spend up to twice that going to a movie theater depending on what city you live in and what theater you go to. You can spend more than that on a fucking music CD with maybe 50-ish minutes of music on it. You can spend more than that on a short book.

Haha are you fucking dumb? How the ruck is $10 for an hour good for your money? I've already said movies aren't worth the money. CD's are. I'm not necessarily saying $60 is a lot for a video game, but in this case it is because he's only going to play it for 6 hours

Go suck corporate cock elsewhere, redditor.

>contrarian
Of course the redditor has no arguments but
>DUDE IT'S POPULAR HOW DARE YOU ATTACK IT

Seeing this industry die is bound to be much more entertaining than any videogame it can produce.

If you're poor that's fine but don't try to dictate what a good hour to money ratio is because that's about the worst outlook you can have on life. Spend what you want to make you happy if you have the means to afford it.

Yeah I'm not really making a big deal about it because it's still a beta and its also been happening a lot in fps recently

I agree. But it's still a waste of money

But you yourself have admitted you don't even go outside your mom's basement, so what the fuck does a NEET who doesn't know anything at all about entertainment costs because his parents probably pity-buy him the occasional game have to say about entertainment cost? You don't go out and do anything so how do you know what shit should or shouldn't cost?

So you don't go to the theater, you don't own a car, you don't go out to eat, you don't drop 60 bucks for any game(Otherwise you'd have realized, probably a good 25 years ago, that almost every game with a singleplayer component doesn't really exceed 6-ish hours unless it's some open world fetch quest bullshit or some JRPG foot-dragger.), so the question is, what DO you spend money on, and why should we take your opinion on entertainment values seriously?

What fixes the constant disconnects and infinite loading for MP?

>As long as I get six hours of entertainment out of a sixty dollar product
Fag.

This beta barely runs.

It's just the same game as always with different setting, maps and weapons. What do people expect from CoD? It hasn't even changed much from the old ones that everyone loves so much.

Are people searching for realism or somehow a huge battlefield experience? That's not CoD.
CoD is always the more fast game, where it's about how skilled you are and now how good you can throw your grenades.

but who are you quoting user?

There was never any good FPS games you knobheads. Before you yell but muh doom like a retard consider this: shooters attract normalfags like shit attracts flies. Don't be a sheep, rise above.

I'm using a fucking 5 year old mid ranged GPU and I'm getting 60fps at 14400 with medium settings. Haven't updated my drivers in probably 6 months either.

Things you said: >he had expectations for a cod game
Things OP rebutted with: >a decent WW2 CoD game

Day of Infamy

I don't know guys
Its pretty fun
and ran well on my PC

No, I mean it barely runs as in it doesn't work.
I set it to 60FPS but it runs at 90FPS then goes into a dramatic slowdown and crashes most of the time.

>Accuses others of being redditors
>Is so underage they think that games ever had singleplayer that was longer than 6 hours by default in the past while charging similar prices to today.
This is how I know you fucks never played shit during the 90's, or even early 2000's. Games with lengthy singleplayer have ALWAYS been the exception, not the rule. FFS you paid the same prices for shit like Goldeneye and Mario 64 and those were short as fuck. In fact, almost every game this board lauds wasn't beyond 6, maybe 7 hours tops. And they still charged 50-60 dollars back in the day. Fucking Super Mario World on the SNES was 50 god damn dollars and you could literally beat that in less than 3 hours unless you were a completionist.

I love shotguns, but this game just makes me feel like I am unloading a loud party confetti fun cannon into nigger soul mamma nazis

And after all these years, they don't bother changing?
An industry either goes forward or dies.
Then again, this industry has deserved to die for about 10 years already.

When did I say that? When I said I had home meals? Hmmmm it's almost as if there's another 12 hours or the day I could do lots of other things

>that horrifically loud noise when you headshot someone

>Black female Nazi shooting US troops with Holograph sighted BAR with MLG camo in the year 1940-1945

Remember CoD2? Remember iron sights? Remember Cpt. Price? No? ...Okay.

Played since launch and hasn't happened to me at all. I only have 8gb of RAM too so I dont know what the fuck your internet connection is.

What about a Nazigger?

SM64 is pretty long your first few times through until you get really good at it. But yeah most people here grew up with the ps2 or 360 as their first console (lol) I remember paying 60 dollars for 2 hour long NES games and 60 dollars for 2 hour long genesis and SNES games. And they were only 2 hours long because they were so God damn hard that you couldn't beat most of them without retrying over and over. In actuality most were less than an hour long for 60 fucking bucks.

>Use ancient technology
>Get BTFO
kek
Fucking Amish.

Same here
Game runs smooth as fuck on my rig

I'm connected to my modem directly, open ports, everything is allowed through the firewall, nothing blocking the game from doing its job.

Maybe if the game didn't insist on connecting me to people in Iraq with a P2P system it might work.

I literally have 1mb download and .50 download and I've never had internet issues

>Poor fags making less than $10 an hour be mad being salty

It's probably poor connection on OP's part or the other player's. It's always someone with 500ms ping, the developer can't unfuck the registration with compensation when the pings are that bad, but it looks like a 'gotcha' moment when you video it without the ping information

CoD's engine is capable of volumetric lighting. It's capable of many effects that aren't used by devs, as they prioritize performance over looks. If you look at the most succesful multiplayer games, they rarely are graphic's benchmarks with Battlefield being sole exception. Honestly I would love DICE to withdraw some fancy effects from Battlefield 1, as constant fluctuation between 30 and 60 frames on PS4 is horrible.

Day of Infamy is just DoD except not as good. Games have moved on since 2003.

The voice acting is pretty excellent though.