Wake up sheeple

wake up sheeple

good thing nintendo fans are satisfied zombie customers

Needy "I'm the only one who's right!" reviews are the worst reviews, regardless of whether they're negative or positive. I immediately disregard anyone whose review is clearly just made to reply to other reviews.

I don't even care for Mario games and that is one of the worst "critic" summaries I've seen on metacritic. I'd hate to see what the full review looks like, if the most meaningful excerpt they got from it is one that just attacks people who like the game with no real criticism. I think it's time for this site to start vetting their critics more carefully.

Even Jim sterling doesnt go out of his way to attack people who liked a game he didn’t. He just really hated weapon durability being a Thing.

>Even Jim sterling doesn't go out of his way to attack people
>Shitposts a review out and conveniently has a video to bitch about the fanbase in less than a day.

He knew exactly what he was doing.

>Easy=Bad
Fucking hurrdcore gaymers.

>wtf I love literally who reviewer now

> I dont even care for Mario games
that's where you're wrong boy-o

This. We need to get every site who criticized Odyssey or BotW blacklisted by metacritic. Sons of bitches will NOT get away with it again

>Even Jim sterling doesnt go out of his way to attack people
Hahahahaha

>I don't like it 7,5/10

Accurate review.

Voice of truth.

Serbians truly are the worst people on the planet.

>Call mario a game for zombies
>Not COD, AssCreed or many of the other yearly titles

The last mario game was in 2012.

This

>mario
>ever been challenging

the real probleme is that he's not a little kid anymore

Games should at least have some form of challenge to them. challenging =/= hard

>complaining about difficulty
>in a fucking Mario game

what's next on the chopping block? Kirby?

Pretty much it. Mechanically, gameplay wise, story wise it is a 10/10 game. Let's say for conversation's sake, you don't like certain aspects of it, then that is an "opinion" and "opinions" should only affect a game's rating so much before you start to call bullshit. I haven't seen youtube vids of glitches, or WHITES ARE DEVILS, or anything that could be a negative of the game. Odyssey is a solid well polished game; at most if you don't like it, it could go down to an 8/10 any lower than that and the lines between flaw and personal opinion get blurred.

Some of the more common complaints people have are; too many Moons, no consistencies in the Moons you can possibly get per stage, Bosses are not hard enough, Not enough bosses, Not enough stages

>challenging =/= good
Fixed.

>Mechanically, gameplay wise, story wise it is a 10/10 game

if you're 8 years old

it's a game
a walk in the park is not a game
if the game isnt a challenge, then it's not fun

>review
Jim has not done a review in months M8. I think you are a fucking idiot.

Jim Sterling:
>How dare metacritic users give Fallout 4 bad reviews! Le Metebombed!

>Let me give Zelda a shitty review and cry about being attacked by 5 year old nintenbros to my loyal Patreons™

I bet they played with Game Assist on and bitched about it being to easy anyway

It's the easiest game ever made. Of course most ''journalists'' would like that piece of shit game.

>tfw bad enough at video games that odyssey feels like a nice challenge to me
Feels good being a satisfied zombie customer. Not sure where this hat on my head came from though.

How would you deal with difficulty in a game if you were to try and make it appeal to children and "long-term fans"? Bear in mind people who were children or teens who grew up with this series could be pushing 50. There's probably long-term fans who like it being easy so their kids can play it.

The way that makes sense to me is have the game be fairly easy but with more difficult bonus levels, which is what I think this game does anyway.

So which is it? Are bing bing wahoos supposed to be for children or adults?

>satisfied zombie customers
ProJared proves you wrong, faggot.

>8/10
>8/10
>8/10
>8/10
>8/10
>8/10