What angers me the most about Wolfenstein

It's not the outrageous premise, it's not the blatant anti-White propaganda, it's not the characterization of Adolf Hitler as a paranoid senile moron with a gun who kills people for fun, it's not the publishers' appealing to Antifa faggots who want to "punch Nazis", it's not the glorifying racemixing degeneracy, it's not even the grotesquely excessive scene where a pregnant woman strips naked and while being showered with blood machine guns a Nazi robotic dog to death.

You know what pisses me off the most?

The fact we can't choose between a soup porridge timeline. Seriously, for all we know, 10 year old BJ Blaskowicz choosing between eating his mother's homemade soup or porridge could completely alter history as we know. Why aren't we allowed to choose? For fuck's sake, we're forced at gunpoint to choose whether to brutally dissect Fergus Reid or Private Wyatt. Why can't we make the simple choice to enjoy soup or porridge?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/z1edtGUzDo0?t=23
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>anti-white propaganda
Nazis were also Anti-White

Fuck off Sup Forums

That's beside the point

ignore and move on

I liked the whole nazis are bad thing even though american culture remained unchanged and there are robots everywhere and people born in 1889 manage to live to 1970 and still look good.

>the soup that got away
youtu.be/z1edtGUzDo0?t=23

I, too, like reading Ray Bradbury OP

bump

denied

>muh anti white propoganda!
>It's totally real!

>Oh my god
>You can TALK!

I forgot how funny early FG is.

even hitler's best friends agree he was paranoid as fuck

No. This is a Sup Forums problem.
Sup Forums is busy sperging out over Catalonia independence and Trumps wall.

>The fact we can't choose between a soup porridge timeline.
Have we reached maximum autism here? Holy fuck

There's no reason to have separate timelines since all reasonable people would pick the soup over the degenerate (((porridge)))

Are you new?

>No. This is a Sup Forums problem.
Yeah they still aren't autistic and brainwashed enough

Yes, but when Hitler decided to kill people it was usually with fairly understandable reason from a Machiavellian perspective (to advance his agenda and his own power). For example, he ordered the death of Ernst Rohm because he saw Rohm as a threat to his undisputed leadership in the NSDAP. Shooting an actor for not addressing you by the correct pronoun is just laughably bad storywriting and makes him out to be a joke rather than a ruthless tyrant.

Hitler was an incompetent, moronic leader. Read some Albert Speer.

...

>Hitler was an incompetent, moronic leader.

You have to be somewhat shrewd to successfully outmaneuver the Army, the Conservatives, the Social Democrats, and the Communists and seize power to build a one party state.

Bingo

>anti-white

YOU ARE A FAGGOT

And you're a nigger loving Judeo-Bolshevik degenerate.

Nazis were anti parasite. There's nothing wrong with wanting every ethno-state to be the best they can be within the borders of their own nation.

cry more

Isn't Super Spesh basically a combination of Alex Jones and Bill Cooper?