The power...of the XboneX

The power...of the XboneX...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/YXhpN1pGLfc?t=78
youtu.be/97mV1lV9yPs
youtube.com/watch?v=MPKae-do4CY&t=0s
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Absolutely amazing...

>15 FPS

DELTE THISSSSSS

REEEE. I shouldn't have sold my 1080ti for a Bone X.

CPU issues. Game is extremely CPU bound, and consoles have extremely shit CPUs

>some shitty AAA dev doesn't care for optimization
wow... so this means...

Hahaha but seriously delete this now

>APU hovers around 60-70C
>Power usage hovers around 160-200W

does gn mention if the graphics settings used in the console version at 4k are equivalent to maxed out settings in PC?

No, but DF does.
They're not.
Seems like XB1X hovers around high settings, while PS4 Pro is a mix of medium and high.

Have they ever done any power tests on these latest consoles?
Something the peasants could lord over us is they aren't running a near air conditioner just to play vidya
If it test that way

For single player it's fine.

Oh boy, it's a "devs target buzzwords" episodes. High res without high settings is damn near worthless. Better off at 1080p with ultra settings

see
The XboneX actually produces a ton of heat according to their tests.
And those temps are after they replaced the crappy stock thermal paste with their own aftermarket paste.

>XboneX actually produces a ton of heat
that's total system power consumption, it's half what most pcs use

It's also in a much smaller chassis with more limited airflow

user, the APU BACKSIDE is hitting 60+C, with replaced thermal paste.
That's hot as fuck, and that power usage is pretty high, that's around what a high end laptop consumes, and those laptops usually have i7s clocked at 3+ GHz.

175w isn't that bad, a loaded PC at high FPS will definitely top that

see
175W for what is effectively mobile components is on the high end.

I see, thanks

No it's okay because it's at FOUR KAY

Funny that the Pro runs hotter and is a lot weaker.

Ok but Destiny 2 is capped at 30 FPS, what is the point of this?

Can someone really explain the appeal of this shit? They definitely did a better job than Sony with the PS4 Pro, but I fail to see what this will do to help Microsoft's situation at all.

Admittedly, I'm not an Xbox nut, but I was excited to see what they were cooking at the Scorpio reveal, and it was basically just a fucking PS4 Pro.

Wouldn't surprise me, Sony's always been pretty retarded when it comes to thermals.

the whole thing is just a giant graphics card, it has the same airflow as a giant blower card
>60+C
and? that's completely normal and safe.
>that power usage is pretty high
not really, my gpu consumes more power on it's own.

>and? that's completely normal and safe.
For a mobile part, no, it's not.
>my gpu consumes more power on it's own.
Your GPU isn't a mobile part, and it's likely some old last-gen GPU or a much more powerful GPU.
Those backside temps are even hotter than a gaming laptop.

frame time inconsistencies are still bad at 30fps. a consistent 30fps frame time is fine. when it jumps around a lot it feels stuttery and bad.

it's why CoD Infinite Warfare feels really off while older titles that ran at perfect 60 (like MW2) feel great and responsive

It's nice to see that these devs are updating these games. I know Ass Creed just had a new update a couple hours ago to address some stuff.

>For a mobile part, no, it's not.
U's not a mobile part

It's an SoC using a mobile architecture (Jaguar) designed for laptops and tablets, so yes, it is.

>the whole thing is just a giant graphics card, it has the same airflow as a giant blower card
True, but considering you said that in response to "smaller chassis," it's pretty obvious you don't know how airflow works, not to mention the fact that the Xbone X chassis is mostly closed to look better. It has very limited air to cool with, which heats things up considerably. Compare that to the PS4 which has holes in between layers of the eraser to draw air in and an ass of roach vents in the back to blow it out. Airflow and the struggle of smaller chassis is why you don't see very many mini ITX extreme gaming builds either. More heat in close proximity with limited cooling capabilities.

PC has fewer arrows

PC btfo

>More heat in close proximity with limited cooling capabilities.
The real question is when mini-ITX water cooling will be viable outside of a handful of use cases.

I'm not sure we'll ever see that unless they start making water coolers specifically for mini ITX. I normally prefer air cooling because I'm paranoid of something breaking and leaking on my parts, but I could never do a mini ITX gaming build on air. Not one with any decent strength anyway. Too worried about temps

>Gamersnexus benching consoles
Nice, they're a lot more in-depth than DF and way less shilly.

4k15
Silky smooth

More arrows is handicap for niggers who can't hit shit, especially on a gamemenstruationpad.

HAHAHHAHA

WHAT A MONSTER

>The Xbox One X version uses a dynamic resolution ranging between 2688x1512 and 3840x2160. Pixel counts of 3840x2160 seem to be rare on the Xbox One X.
Whoa...

Anyone have some links for a 4K BD player and a 4K HDR monitor? I've looked at some prices and those two items alone are as much as the new xbox.

That's embarrassing.

Aww shit, an XboneX comes with a 4k TV?

To be fair I'm running a gtx1070 with a 7600k (OC'd to 4.5) and it still runs like wieners a lot of the time

Define "wieners."
Because drops to 15 FPS is pretty shit.

>Xbox of any type has erratic performance
this was always expected. microsoft are unbelievably shit at refining a product

So, no link? Just looking for some deals.

Don't worry, once they start benchmarking the PS4 Pro we'll be seeing the same shit.
Like with pic related.

its not brilliant but the ps4 is consistent (at providing below performance), so at least it wont be jarring. the xbox performance there looks a joke, it probably puts the player off during a fight

>its not brilliant but the ps4 is consistent
Are you joking?
The PS4 Pro version has hilarious amounts of stutter in FFXV.
youtu.be/YXhpN1pGLfc?t=78

christ thats bad

>Neither version comes anywhere near close to 4k
What's the point?

Higher resolution I guess.

>They definitely did a better job than Sony with the PS4 Pro

>I was excited to see what they were coming at the Scorpio reveal, and it was basically just a fucking PS4 Pro

What did you mean by this?

This isn't exactly true while it's nice to have the whole package I'd rather play OW at medium settings at 900p/1080p than high or ultra at 720p. I did this plenty when I was a poorfag in all manner of games. Resolution is all about visual clarity and splendor but I can see some anons enjoying their 720p blur in exchange for better shadows.

And yet the pro is lagging halfway through the race no matter the comparison.

>keep pushing resolution and graphics quality options
>nag and whine about the literal 1 thing they dont care about and havent since "silky smooth 30 fps"
blame your own god damn selves for what its come to, you retarded pleb cucks worship visuals and stare at ground textures all day, so the marketing execs think all you care about is floor textures, and not 60+ fps .

you're literal cancer, go cry about your cpu spikes when its pushing 4k when 2,000 dollar pc cant even do it

not him, but it does have better hardware so maybe future cames with accommodate the the xbonex moreso in utilising performance.
he isn't wrong though, for the sake of games right now it is practically the same. the jump in resolution from ps4pro to xbonex is marginal

>Bu-but Sony!!!

Every time.

So much for that "beast."

i-it's a MONSTER

LOL BUT ITS MAIN COMPETITOR LUL WHY WOULD ANYONE BRING UP HOW IT FARES VS COMPETING PRODUCTS ON THE MARKET

PLS DUN MAKE FUN OF PAPA SONY PLS IT HURTS

>when its pushing 4k
>the most common measurements saw Pro spend much of its time at 1440p, with Xbox One X between 1700p and 1800p in the same areas.
Silky smooth

I thought the Pro and the X1X would be comparable, but the X1X runs circles around it with added benefits to BC games. It's a great price for what you get when compared to a PC which would cost at least twice as much.

so theyre both a con, but one costs $150 more

go away marketer

A comparable PC would be around $600 actually.

The boneX has the most state of the art cooling any console has ever had. And despite how much power it's pumping out it's still quieter than the weaker pro.

I thought the raw power of the Xbox One X all-in-one games and entertainment system put it in a league of its own?

Now we're on "Bu bu bu it's slightly better than the PROTATO lmao!!!!" which is the bare minimum considering it's newer and more expensive.

Apparently it's a non-issue and you're talking about shit you have no clue in regards to. They didn't design and proof a console with a high failure rate, that would be a serious publicity and fiscal disaster. Furthermore I doubt the veracity of your claims regarding the adversity of mobile hardware lifetime under heat stress.

Shoo shill, shoo.

It depends on whether you're getting a prebuilt or building it yourself(cheaper) but the X is pretty great. I just hope consolebabbies show interest on non potato hardware because if there's anything we've learned this gen is that you can put in netbook/tablet tier hardware on a home console and get away with it.

>But I thought 2+2=5????? y u say it equl 4?!
They've been completely open with the specs of the console and outlets like digitalfoundry have dumbed it down so any consolebabbie can understand. After all that why would you still draw such an ignorant conclusion? Oh I know it's because you don't know shit about hardware or actually learning anything about the product itself.

Your only interest is dumb shitflinging in an anonymous imageboard for the sole purpose of converting other ignorant fools into fellow shitflingers.

MS is famous for designing and launching a console with a high failure rate.

>State facts
>Nu uh, daddy said ur a shill

MORE LIKE XBOX NO ONE WANT XD

>Make flippant claims and call people idiots
>Facts
Pick one.
You're a shill daddio, get out.

What the fuck happened to DF?

They used to have great content and now it's just trash

...

lol it can get frustrating around here, but then you have to remember how old the average poster is. I do truly think there are a lot of people on this board who are upset at how well the new xbox is doing and reviewing. The thing that showed me that it's a good value is all the PC shitposting in these threads. I never seen so many pseudo builds and petty arguments over a console before. I even wonder how many are using specs equivalent to a PS4 and are just mad that games are performing better on a machine than what they currently own. It's a normal reaction, but it comes off as being petty and insecure.

They stopped just sticking to the facts and started talking constantly.
Videos used to be mainly performance metrics with a bit of talking, now they're the opposite.

>I never seen so many pseudo builds and petty arguments over a console before.
Imagine being this new.
You must be one of those idiots who got here in 2014.
This shit is actually pretty tame compared to the 8 GB GDDR5 shitposting when the PS4 was announced.

Hi Pajeet.

You know he's just a shill, right?
It's your typical pajeet-tier marketing, M$ did the same thing with W10 here and on Sup Forums.

There is no system that can run this game well.

Sure there is, an i7 8700k and a 1080 Ti.
Now go spend some more money goy.

Should have been tipped off by the broken English and idiotic post.

This system will not be able to deliver a constant 60 fps, and if you try to frame lock to 30, it will deliver an uneven shitty 29.5 fps.

I'm sure you can pick up a monitor for around $400 so just add that to the price. Not quite $500 like the Xbox, but it'll run games slightly better.

>This system will not be able to deliver a constant 60 fps
???
youtu.be/97mV1lV9yPs

High failure and total failure are two different things. Consoles are made with the cheapest silicon available to fit their target price range. That is to say the lottery for consoles in inherently poor, if the implication that because the architecture the Scorpio uses is more probable to fail, then it will fail almost entirely. This is not the case though. I believe someone misconstrued rated TDP as a redline while it's actually a thermal output approximation in Watts. Mobile components are designed to consume less power and therefore generate less heat.

Mobile components are also designed for extraordinarily poor cooling conditions and as a byproduct, if anything, they are designed then to be more resilient. Even with that said critical temperatures for any computing device with the exception of quantum processors are about 85c, and can even be pushed more or less reliably above that even.

Nice. Considering how much it cost compared to the new xbox and that's a really good deal. Not to mention the new patch that fixed the frame rate.

The new patch didn't fix anything actually, game still runs like trash.
Begone shill.

What is this? I'm not a console player, is that some sort of "stream games your system can't run" thing?

Full benchmarks video
youtube.com/watch?v=MPKae-do4CY&t=0s

Given GN removed the shit tier thermal paste they probably improved thermals dramatically

console gaming is dead. PC mustards win again!

This. Anyone who disagrees with you is a shill. What's it like to be mentally handicapped.

I'll see you on PUBG, fellow master racer!

You can do this with any piece of hardware even intel's $2000 CPUs lol.