Hear me out Sup Forums.
If somebody sees "hardly and difference" between 30 fps and 60 fps, then their brain probably barely runs above 30 hz.
If their brain runs that slowly then they cannot produce gamma waves.
As we all know:
>Gamma brain waves (39-100 hz) are involved in higher mental activity and consolidation of information
So, if you claim there's no difference between 30 and 60 fps, you're probably just not as evolved as the rest of us.
They are lying because they never actually played any game at 60 fps, the difference is extremely fucking obvious.
When I was in college my Optics teacher couldn't tell between 24 and 60, she was so sure there was no difference she told me I would pass only if I proved her wrong.
I even got a scholarship after that.
The 30fps meme is obviously a myth made up by console babbies and laptop/mac users
Even the jump to 144 is very noticeable
Thats the whole point tho, just like how u cant see more than 60 fps with a 60hz monitor.
Maybe these people just have slower brains and cant see that fast, so even 60 fps looks like 30 to them.
>sees "hardly and difference"
Thats the main problem with this retard meme, this is a visual difference but the main point is 30fps FEELS WORSE because its less responsive
Video games are an INTERACTIVE MEDIUM, CONTROL IS IMPORTANT, its not a fucking movie or tv show
even with a 60hz monitor its more responsive if you have higher than 60 fps because of how frames are rendered compared to how a monitor puts out signal
This is the truth right here.
I only play games at 268 fps and if you say there no difference you're a pleb.
anything below 262 is unplayable
UofR alumni here
we da bes
...
>Video games are an INTERACTIVE MEDIUM, CONTROL IS IMPORTANT, its not a fucking movie or tv show
30fps in video games are not the same as videos. Movies were once called 'flicks' because at the original 24fps they would appear to 'flicker' until the protectors were using double and triple frames, effectively a 72 frame per second rate with only 24 original frames.
Then there is natural motion blur of light hitting a camera lens, not some effect added after a frame has been rendered, hence 'post' processing effects.
f 60fps was the norm for movies we would call 24fps literally unwatchable. its just what we're used to maaaan.
Eventually we'll be playing 120fps and anything under will be literally unplayable
30 FPS makes games look better. Low frame rates force your brain to fill in the missing details, resulting in visuals your brain wants to see. It's why people hated the Hobbit at 48FPS, since the extra frames added more detail that your brain has to process and fewer gaps for your imagination to use.
>no 144 or 120
pooro faggo
>144 or 120
>no 240
hows the br life treating you
Im honestly okay with 30fps as long as its stable
A 1:1 ratio of (IQ) to (frames per second) exists and is used to determine where the line is drawn between your sub-human brain being able to tell the difference or not.
Alpha humans no longer require limitations because they're able to adapt to continue improving with frame rates of 144, 240, 480, 1000 per second and so on.
Anyone unable to see a difference above the 90 fps mark should just be cut as a loss from the human race because robots will eventually absorb their work roles in society.
...
I unironically can't see the difference. My eyes are both kind of shit so that might be a part of it, but both going 30-60 and 60-30 I absolutely can't tell the difference, at all. 60 does not feel or look any more fluid or anything.
If it's a fighting game, fps, or something similar where even the smallest fraction of a second's difference can make the difference between life and death then anything less than 60fps is completely unacceptable. In turn based stuff or just games with less need for such precision then 30fps or sometimes even lower can be fine if the game manages to not look like shit.
hahaha le epic "brain fps" meme lel
The brain is a continuous chemical computer. It doesn't have a Hz value. It updates in every single infinitesimally small moment of time.
Similarly, the human eye is constant and continuous. If there are two separate flashes of light separated by a given amount of time, then as that amount of time becomes arbitrarily small, there is no point at which your eye does not receive the light information.
Jesus fucking Christ.
now I understand