What the fuck? How does that works?

What the fuck? How does that works?

Other urls found in this thread:

boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/acfag/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

DewM Multiplayer was so terrible that removing it added it 1.4 more points

Pretty much. Who plays DOOM for the multiplayer anyway.

What the fuck

>Different reviewers from the same site aren't allowed different opinions

the multiplayer is intact on the switch version guys

They fixed the Multiplayer in the Switch review

...

And downgraded the game to 480p/20fps.

what the fuck

When was the last time a "different opinion" wasn't in the favor of Nintendo.

Unlike the posts on this Cambodian stamp collecting board reviews aren't all made by one person

>game is inferior on inferior hardware
wow how shocking

...

No one ever said Nintendo didn't get bonus points.
Bonus points are for being better.

>7.1

Why should I listen to their opinion?

>610p/sub 30fps
>horrible textures
>other versions of game are 1080p/60fps with great textures
>8.5
so if he was playing the PS4 version he'd give it a 10/10?

the multiplayer is on the switch. all of the sudden everyone is ok with doom 4 multiplayer now, even though everyone hated it at launch. the updates didn't even improve that much

What the fuck?

no because the rest of the game is the same retard
should every PC port get a higher score too?

>worse graphics
>worse framerate
>worse resolution
>worse performance overall
>better

>listening to game journalists

umm... WHAT THE FUCK?

>b-but graphics
every time

its simple

nintendo payed money to the reviewer for a good review

fuck off journofag, NOBODY ELSE RESPOND TO THIS ATTENTION WHORE OR HE WILL DRAG YOU INTO AN ENDLESS LOOP NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY

Also a broken clock is right twice a day eat my shit

don't underestimate the power of a tit-sucking Nintendo baby. The bonus basically comes on its own.

>a broken clock is right twice a day
Unless they're giving a sony or MS product a high score.

>95 v 97
I don't see the dilemma it's clear which is better

I liked both

If the same game but with significantly worse performance gets an 8.5 I can't imagine how much higher he'd give the PS4 or PC version. Hypothetically, of course because we all know he wouldn't for pretty obvious reasons.

>should every PC port get a higher score too?
PC ports routinely get higher scores especially if it's a game designed for PC.

Reviewers literally sometimes give two scores, one for the console version for the PC version, with the PC version usually getting a higher score unless there are technical problems exclusive to PC like in Arkham Knight.

>ha ha I don't care about g-graphics
nintenfags are THIS assmad

There's only an endless loop if you're wrong. Journalism is shit. BotW is a middling game with some great ideas it failed to implement as far as it could and should have. TloU is a decent game over reliant on narrative.

And the point here isn't that my opinion is right. It's having an opinion independent of, yet potentially still informed by, reviews that makes you right. Using reviews as a prop to defend shit is folly. Enjoy what you enjoy senpai.

The only one sounding assmad here is you. Calm down, bucko.

Didn't say that cunt. Your argument is fallacious. A bunch of people you don't like enjoying something does not mean said thing CAN NOT be good, only a downie thinks like you do.

Its portable. Just because you think that isn't a plus doesn't make it not a plus.

it's literally the same game with noticeably worse performance, of course graphics and framerate matter you retard.

>you can play Doom in 1080p/60fps
>or 610p/26fps
>lmao who cares doesn't matter

>make game worse
>gets more points
nintendo seriously just isn't videogames anymore. They're separate from videogames. Nintendo is nintendo while everyone else is video games.

It should be a bannable offense to discuss nintendo products on Sup Forums

See Your word is not the end-all on a game, it doesn't matter who you disagree with or what you think, you can't impose your shoddy opinions on others like you try to do

At least they're not as bad as steam """"reviewers""""

>the worst version of the game is still a good game
this statement doesn't make sense to some people

Stop making this thread you fucking retard.

I can see portability being a plus for a game like Pokemon or even Mario but there's no reasonable argument as to why portability should get prioritized over basic performance for a game like Doom.

And "i can play it while I take a shit" is not a reasonable argument so don't bother.

Nintendo makes quality of life products, so it's no wonder the self-loathing "life is a bitter pill" teens on Sup Forums hate them.

I have a lot of fun with Doom's Multiplayer.
What do you faggots not like about it?

>handheld standards are lower than home console standards because graphicsfags don't review switch games
who would have thought?

why are you making a multiplat into a console war
you're disgusting

Fuck the fuck off.

I'm a huge fan of Nintendo. I was raised on it. I have a Switch and I love it, but this is ridiculous. There most certainly is a Nintendo bias. It's like Disney or McDonalds, it's the name that gets graded, not the product. That's why we have idiots who will eat up anything with Nintendo, Marvel, etc. on the cover. It's also why we have contrarians who refuse to like anything Nintendo or Marvel. Is Doom good on the Switch? Probably, but I doubt it's as pretty or as fast as it is on my fairly decent PC. Nintendo makes great games, but they don't care so much about how many cylinders are under the hood. Which is why the switch is like a summer breeze. Doom is not a summer breeze, it's a hurricane.

Imagine if Cyberpunk 2077 came out for PC only and it had beautiful 4K/60fps performance and it got a 7.5 from IGN. Then a year later it came to PS4 and ran at 720p/30fps and IGN reviewed it again and gave it a 8.9

>talking to ACfag
Stop it.

Dumb frogposter

This.

>A bunch of people you don't like enjoying something does not mean said thing CAN NOT be good,
Meanwhile, in another thread

>sony pays for reviews!
>Microsoft bribed reviewers to like cuphead
>these people are wrong and hate nintendo, they shouldn't be allowed opinions!

Funny how you don't practice what you preach.

Could be that it was given by two different reviewers. Both probably nintenbros. Sonyntendo wins again

>It's a port
>Graphics are the only changes
>Get's more points due to inherent Pro-Nintendo bias
>Acts smug about it

Every time.

The two things the Switch version could have better are Gyro and Portable. There is no Gyro. It utilizes only 50% of the Switch's only leg up on the competition. It's like everyone gets a free pass, no one gives a fuck about quality, the consumer should settle for half-assed bullshit and like it. What a fucking joke. When I was a kid, Mario Sunshine got an 8/10 and a fair review based on it's shortcomings. No pass, no flaws ignored, it got the proper treatment.

This is a mockery. What are they putting in our water supply these days?

>of course graphics and framerate matter you retard.
>lmao who cares doesn't matter
Visibly_Upset.jpg

No they don't, and you're retarded.

Reggie is on the verge of suicide

>NOBODY ELSE RESPOND TO THIS ATTENTION WHORE OR HE WILL DRAG YOU INTO AN ENDLESS LOOP NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY
And just to show you what you're in for:
boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/acfag/

Pretty sure these reviews are by two different people.

Show me on the doll where ACfag touched you.

>smug
kek. You mean like how smug you faggots get until you can't spout
>third party support
and have to come up with something original to shitpost about

shit.

>game comes out
>gets a stupid score
>gets ported
>gets a more reasonable score from somebody else

???

No multi, so no minuses for it, so higher score.
Based Nintendo.
And who cares about this game running 20fps, it isn't like you can see difference between 60 and 20.

>Portability is a bonus!
>even though the vast majority of switch owners either play on their tv or in bed

Don't bother. People will reply to shitposters regardless of what you tell them. That's why Lanced Jack or manlet tears was such a problem.

Doom is really good for a handheld system.

as someone in the "gamez jurrnalizm" circle i can confirm to you that plenty of these fucks due give nintendo and anything with its ips "bonus points."

not for any sort of money or shit like that, but because they are jut nostalgia-ridden children with no journalistic integrity.

user, think about something.

Some people using switch as home console (majority of them).
Doom running 600p/20fps in docked mode.
People paying 60$ for this experience in 2017, when you can play it 1080p/60fps on cheaper system.

Nintendoboys.

People who play on Switch actually like video games while PS4 users like movies. Is it really surprising?

>mediocre game gets better scores on a platform with lesser competition.
Gee I wonder...

Playing on bed without a wired controller so you can play in any position you want, while also watching TV = top-tier comfy

>Playing 60fps shooter with 20fps.
Ok.

When people mention "portability" I would think they mostly mean "handheld".

I've very rarely played any of my handheld systems outside of my home.

Removing a cancerous lump makes something less shitty. Who would've thought?
Also, the eye can DEFINITELY tell the difference between 30 and 60, but only if the game is graphically demanding. 30fps Mario 64 vs 60fps Mario 64, no change.
30fps Fallout 4 vs 60fps Fallout 4, biggu (significant, not necessarily huge) difference.

cool it with all the samefagging, sport

>implying "Doom" 4 wasn't made for the Halo/Call of Dudebro/Shillzone/Commiestein crowd and only had gameplay it at all because of grandfather clause

No, switch owners like nintendo - not videogames. If they liked videogames they would also play these games on pc/xbox/ps4, but they dont play these games, cause they don't like videogames, cause they like nintendo. Nintendo is literally the antithesis of videogames.

did you even pay attention?

Why is everyone so shocked? Literally all the top review sites are shills. Its been proven ffs. Ever heard of gamergate?

You can't use wireless controllers as a plus when it's an industry standard.

You can't use "the ability to consume other media too" as a plus when that's fucking retarded.

That's still stupid. I like portables, I really do, but only because of the games I play on them and how they skew what they focus on from graphics to gameplay. But with Doom on switch they don't do that, they just dumb down the same experience I had on PC a year ago

>people unironically use this joke site for grade scaling of games

Not an argument for inconsistency.

You know what really happened?
By the time it came out on Switch, IGN reviewers realized that people actually liked this game a lot, so they spat our a review to match

>quality of life products

yeah i know. motionl controls and stupid peripheral gimmicks. totally quality of life

i hated the lack of competitive depth, but i never really was clear on what was the general opinion on what was bad about it

I hate to agree with this, but there's a hint of truth here. Nintendo fans HATE any game that isn't on the Switch. Look at the hate Cuphead gets, as do Indie games before they hit the Switch. and then we had people reporting others to Nintendo for emulating BOTW. I don't think any of them are idorts, or at least they don't act like it.

>different reviewers give different scores

wow who would've known thanks Sup Forums for enlightening me today

When an IGN writer makes a review, his review represents the entirety of the site. No one will say "Dave Faggotson of IGN gave this a 9/10" they will always say "IGN gave this a 9/10"

How can you even remotely prove this? How do you know the games sell like shit because the owners only like Nintendo games and not because they buy them on other platforms?

You just argued against yourself in the same comment. I have a Switch, but I would never buy Doom on that shit because I played it on PC.

t. edgy teens

Naw, cause Nintetards are like PCfats bitching and moaning to port games on their shittier systems.

people like you are why people shitpost

I'm playing Doom on the switch and it is actually a shockingly close experience to what it was when I played it on my ps4. It's still the same core game and the halved framerate doesn't cut into that as much as you would think.

And I'm usually a big stickler for 60fps.

>IGN
You are supposed to post scores from sites that are even a bit relevant

Nah, see what I do is, I buy Nintendo, PC AND PS4 games because I'm not fucking retarded enough to stand by one system and try to pull damage control when someone attacks a system's version of a game. When skyrim hits the Switch it's gonna be a shitshow here. I love Nintendo, but I'm not about to buy a port when it (literally) adds nothing.

you're replying seriously to a shitpost from some destitute underage

Any site using scores isn't going to be relevant. They're all corporate shitlickers chasing ad money.

>20fps isn't so bad
So this is power of nintendo shilling?

But they actually don't, hence why this keeps happening and why nobody that knows better cares.