There are people on this board who unironically think that this is better than dark souls 3

>there are people on this board who unironically think that this is better than dark souls 3

ds3 is just a polished turd

no, there aren't

2>1>3 as always.

>there are people on this board who unironically think that this game good

Even fucking lords of the fallen is better than dark souls 3

3 sucked but was fun, 2 sucked and wasn't fun
das>bb>des>shit>the others

>2 wasn't fun
kill yourself

Agreed

1=people like it for nostalgia
3=people like or because babbies first souls game
2=objectively good

>5 good bosses in the game
>3 are dlc
solid game

you must be a pkek
>des
nostalgia
>1
funnest first play through in the series
>2
best ng+
>bb
just the best, period
>3
3 was 3

>there are "people" on this board who unironically claim dark souls to be a good gayme while DeS and Bloodborne exist

...

All virgins

>bringing up bloodborne in a dark souls discussion
classic sonygro

2>1

DeS and BB are 20 FPS though

I don't understand how some can think that DS3 is a better game.

>Most linear Souls progression wise

>No bonfire ascetics, you have to go to NG if you want to replay a boss

>In DS2, you can skip to Drangleic castle at the start and do levels in any order you like, while DS3 is more limited

>Covenants are unfinished and have shit rewards

>NG+ is pretty much pointless because you can get +3 versions of important rings in the ringed city on your first playthrough, plus, no new eemy placements on NG+

>Respec system has stupid limit

>No poise = Heavy gear is pointless

>Game heavily encourages gank squads

>3=people like or because babbies first souls game
>2=objectively good
You goit it backwards fampai

ds1 > ds3/bb > des >>> ds2

>bb isn't a souls game
if it was on pc you'd say it was

>mfw they're all me