Remember when numale and women didn't decide what goes on the cover of a game?

Remember when numale and women didn't decide what goes on the cover of a game?

new lara is and always will be more attractive than old lara

>I like indecisive but strong looking women who always have their eyebrows turned up cause they can never decide if they're brave or confused

agreed

fpbp

dykes

castrated numales

>I like mud golems created in Africa by a team of pissed off witch doctors

Yeah, those old covers were brilliant with their low poly model posing under the game's title.

>what are technical limitations

In other words, the primary demographic of Sup Forums and videogames in general.

>t. pedophile
old lara actually was a fantasy of a perfect woman, fitting for the kind of fantastical action game she stared in

simplicity at its best

and old lara didn't give a single fuck about anything

new one can't even kill a deer without crying

Anyone who thinks nuLara is better looking is in fact a homosexual

Fact.

If the western culture could be represented on a parabolic path, we reached the peak in 90s, and since then have been trending downwards. Now we need to hit the bottom peak before things get better again.

Old Lara's face is all kinds of jacked up. The field models of the FFVII girls are better looking.

Her face got better in the later games.

Other one is magazine cover and other is internet blog. I don't see what that has to do with game covers.

>I like women that look like someone left a blow up doll in the hot sun

>the freaking playstation one

>I like attractive women

I don't disagree.

She looks great there but that's not "old Lara."

Cause magazines barely exist anymore as far as gaming is concerned. Best equivalent is digital journalist sites now.

Neither are game covers though.

I consider the LAU trilogy Lara to also be old Lara, she is pretty much the same Lara as the core games only with better graphics. And you are forgetting that those games are actually getting to be pretty old now

I meant magazine game covers.

Which is exactly why New Lara is better. She looks like an attractive human female and not a Chinese knockoff Real Doll. Maybe her face wouldn't have been so bad if everyone in the game had janky fucking faces, but by the time the Underworld/Anniversary games came out, the other NPCs started looking like people, making Lara and her stupid alien face stick out like a sore thumb.

Will Lara ever become a femme fatale again or is she going to remain an angst crybaby forever?

It's a character model from 1996 you retards, I'm sure it would look a little better if done by today's standards

>It's a character model from 1996
That doesn't explain her terrible face from Legend/Anniversary/Underworld, the last of which came out in 2008.

?

Man I want this Lara back. Not that creation made by an Anthony Burch knockoff.

>She looks like an attractive human female and not a Chinese knockoff Real Doll.
>Angelina Jolie in her prime looks like a doll
Kill yourself tumblr

>And you are forgetting that those games are actually getting to be pretty old now
That's become a constant problem for me. Shit freaks me out when I realize the Dreamcast is now older today than the NES was when the Dreamcast came out. Really fucks with your sense of time.

That's your opinion, I thought the LAU trilogy had the best looking Lara out of all TR games. Now her face looks like your generic teenage Starbucks barista, along with the most annoying personality ever given to a video-game character

>That doesn't explain her terrible face from Legend/Anniversary/Underworld
No that's just your shit taste tumblr

>Now her face looks like your generic teenage Starbucks barista
So it looks like an ugly spic woman?

Lara Croft was practically a superhero. Why did they turn her into a weak, menopausal soccer mom who works at k-mart and gets raped or strangled while being worried about everything?

Fuck yeah, super hot.

That's not an excuse.

>men fighting over how a woman should look
Regardless of which side you're on, you do know the real feminists would count this as sexist right?

I prefer original busty Lara anyway

PS1 Tomb Raider still was a very successful franchise. The models did what they needed to.

Makes more sense. It's still a bit weird to compare magazine cover to some article with screenshot.

If anything the nuLara face has some fucked up proportions

You don't know whats a real feminist these days.

Meanwhile, a first and second wave feminist, aka the ones who actually make fair points, would consider old Lara a marvel.

Modern journalists dont try anymore. Also, the journalists of the old time had more fun and were more passionate about the business. Journalists nowadays just do it for the money.

How can anyone defend such a drastic change to a beloved character? They literally ruined her entire signature look in the new one, she looks completely out of place compared to previous versions

Magazine covers were usually stuck working with whatever assets they received from the publishers. They weren't making many decisions outside of what game would get the cover feature and what assets would look best.

Nice. Now make them all naked.

Old lara was made for men. I dont know who the fuck new lara was made for.

New Lara was made for men posing as male feminists to help them get closer to women who hasn't slept with over 5 different men

truth