What seperates from generic video game reviews and critical analysis?

What seperates from generic video game reviews and critical analysis?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=JLUdckpGHb0
youtube.com/watch?v=uFdgXmH6iLo
youtube.com/watch?v=KpyY7RemXKA
youtube.com/watch?v=Np5PdpsfINA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

People not knowing what they're talking about

>tfw you'll never earn money writing trite garbage and selfpublishing it

>next video is Odyssey
Jesus it probably going to be terrible.

indeed

I like joseph but please stop making threads about ecelebs

Obviously.
He went into the game wanting to hate it because most critics loved it.

>LET ME TALK FOR TWO HOURS ABOUT HOW YOUR OPINION IS SHIT AND MINE IS DOGMA (pls spprt me on patreon)

E-Celeb threads are off topic and not vidya by the way.

>we live in an age where Sunshinefags are now old enough to unironically think their piece of shit is better than any other 3D Mario because MUH NOSTALGIA

When did he ever say anyone's opinion was shit?

Maybe...your opinion is shit user.

>Sunshinefag
Wot?

>WOW I CAN'T BELIEVE ANYONE GAVE THIS A SCORE DIFFERENT THAN MINE
summarises pretty much all his videos.

>What seperates from generic video game reviews and critical analysis?
Does this sentence features proper English?

>making a massive stink on twitter TWICE over something as stupid as reviewers having a different opinion than him on nintendo games

This is why I don't take Anderson seriously. He's trying way too hard to be validated.

He shouldn't even be doing Nintendo reviews anymore, he already threw a tantrum over their youtube policy. Guaranteed he'll do the exact same thing after his Odyssey review.

I wonder if his Odyssey review will be just as shallow and pretentious as his BotW review?

What was his BotW review like?

You don't have many friends, do you?

Entertaining, but not too insightful. Only insightful video I watched was "The Villain of Edith Finch" which was damn good.

Game Maker's Toolkit is better (though, sometimes his videos offer nothing), and so is Matthewmatosis.

But this isn't easy. It's fair to recognize that it's a hard job to provide valuable insight into gamed unless you're a good game designer yourself.

What do you expect from the guy that made a video that was essentially "Um actually matosis is wrong, Dark Souls 2 is great"?

Based Joseph annihilates nintendronies

What it has to do with my friends?
I'm genuinely curious if this sentence is correct. Shouldnt it be something like:

>What separates a generic video game review from a proper critical analysis?

Well, it just mostly the "from" placement.

I wonder if he and hbomberguy would get along or not.

>GMT
>Metroid 2 is a horror game and the entire video about Souls-likes

Nah. He'd probably do better if he researched the stuff he's talking about more though.

I know you have autism user and that's ok, but you don't need to correct someone when it's clear to everyone what they meant.

whatever

>All these people making analysis/critiques of the same fucking games at the same time
>Nobody talking about games that'd be interesting to analyze like Neverwinter Nights, Knights of the Old Republic, Fable, etc.

Oh boy I can't wait to watch Mario Odyssey review #300

...

silly user, old games aren't relevant, there's no ad revenue to be made from making videos on them

>probably /fit/ and /fa/ as fuck
nigga looks like a fucking hamster

It's almost like YT views are most important or something.
youtube.com/watch?v=JLUdckpGHb0
youtube.com/watch?v=uFdgXmH6iLo

remember all those jokes about wii being someone's first console?
Bam, you got people like AngryJoe and Joseph Anderson who are exactly those kinds of people

>Probably /fit/ and /fa/ as fuck

somebody show him

>same fucking games
His last two videos were about some unknown indieshit nobody cares about

>/fit/ and /fa/ as fuck

w E w

>Joseph Anderson
His first was the SNES

A review should focus more on the value for money you're getting

>probably /fit/ and /fa/ as fuck

So who wants to break the news?

literally who

>probably /fit/ and /fa/ as fuck

About 2 hours

Bold claim, but I suppose you have the authority to speak for everyone.

What seperates from generic clickbait and e-celeb shit?

>making a stink
apparently saying what you think is making a stink now? are you nintenbros really this fucking pathetic that you actually screencapped all that for future whining? it sounds like the only one crying about someone else's opinion is you

>writes books as an additional source of income
Because he can't write for shit to make it his primary source of income

Think again

Your just going to post that image without giving a source?

dumb frogposter

>his brief look over at the stories in games are usually the most entertaining part ie EYE, Stalker, War of the Ring
>goes out of his way not to get into them because he doesn’t want his review to become a “story analysis”
It’s not fair

Critical analysis argues exclusively based on content and context/paratext. A review may do this, but a review may also involve how the reviewer feels about the content, which is not critical analysis.

If someone is telling you how something made them feel, they are not worth listening to. Feelings are internal, and thus inherently alienating. You can never truly empathize or understand another person's feelings, so why bother basing an opinion on them? Judge based on substance.

This brings me no happiness.

What vs. Why

>the face of Sup Forums
Or maybe /tg/, he strikes me as a TT player

>he doesn't understand the concept of input delay

how embarrassing

>not taken in by Nintendo's breadcrumb simulator
our guy

I was so disappointed.
God dammit.

Probably having critical analysis and an established and consistent scale with which to judge things. What's the difference between being an art critic and just some guy with an opinion?

Remember when Sup Forums thought he was better than matt?

Yeah but Matt's so ugly he won't even show his face.

with video games, the guy with just an opinion ends up being more enjoyable
youtube.com/watch?v=KpyY7RemXKA

What are the best video game analysis VIDEOS?

youtube.com/watch?v=Np5PdpsfINA

Demon's Souls is not my favorite, but he brings good points.

>korok seeds are th majority of the game

I dunno about this one. I played it for 70 hours and only got like 25 seeds that I stumbled across.

Opinion based on presented evidence isn’t worth listening to?
>you have to kill 500 enemies to level up which felt tedious

>Opinion based on presented evidence isn’t worth listening to?

Did I stutter, newfriend?

This.

But video games are a medium that you experience in multiple ways. Most writers and devs are trying to convey emotion to you; discounting the emotional impact ignores and big part of the gaming experience. You are aware that fun games affect your emotional state even without dramatic storylines and shit, right?

no one is objective retard

>You can never truly empathize or understand another person's feelings

That's an overly black and white way of looking at it. If there's a common opinion on a particular part of a game (i.e. "this element was tedious") then there is obviously some understanding. We're not robots, but we're not completely individualistic either.

>discounting the emotional impact ignores and big part of the gaming experience.

I didn't, my illiterate friend. I discounted other people's opinions about emotional impact, because opinions about internal experiences are less than worthless.

You can never know that anything truly exists, so why bother basing your actions off of the assumption that they do?

Seriously though, any review has to choose what to include or exclude based on personal judgements and feelings so there is no way to even do the retarded thing you're asking for. Even if someone included everything, you may as well just play the game yourself at that point. Not to mention that there are things in games that cannot be expressed in words without massive amounts of wasted time.

The only nice thing I can say about Anderson is that at least he's not as insufferable and petty as hbomberguy

*separates

Something you realize after watching/reading a bunch of Joseph Anderson's material is that he's not nearly as smart as he thinks and is very childish. He's basically a high school kid stuck in a grown man's body and a good vocabulary for his age. The actual points he brings up are either obvious as day or so subjective as to be meaningless. I think this is one case where "shit taste" would be a valid complaint.

I don't know, but I prefer no bullshit video game reviews.
Might be because I make them.

I can't fucking stand his voice. It's like the most generic fucking nerd voice, and it hurts my ears. Why the fuck does everyone like this guy?

Nothing. The only difference is that the one YOU think is right is "critical analysis" and anything you disagree with is "generic video game reviews".

Based on the little snippets I've seen of his BOTW video, I didn't take him as a yet another sarcastic, passive agressive and cynical video game "analyst". Sad.
Joseph Hamsterden.

>people actually think this numale can compare to /ourguy/ MM
I'm not Matthewmatosis btw

So when's a new video coming, Matthew?

>/fit/ and /fa/ as fuck

using greentext without real arguments and sperging memes.

In a mere 7 months, user!

>can’t record rain
>sorry gotta play games
>sorry no internet

How does Matthew get away with it? Are his patrons retarded?

Can this thread just get deleted now? If this image doesn't make you lose all of your respect for this guy you're delusional.

Except every review and critique in existence is based on internal experience.

pose in your Hawaiin shirts for us bb

Critical analysis should include a few citations, in-text or end text. A bibliography of references. While a review should be based on our opinion, experience and point of view. That's what I get when people say that.

Anyone have that screencap where MM says he's scared of becoming a reddit meme reviewer, or something?

>"Mario Odyssey NOT ENOUGH MARIO"
>will complain about outfits
>will complain about story
>will complain about lack of hub area
>will take over an hour to get a simple point across
>will laugh at any of his own remarks that he makes coyly before moving on

His stream is on Youtube; i've never seen somebody try so hard to not have fun
I think he may be autistic

video games are a joke, so any review of a video game is generic and casual

>youtuber threads
>not reaching bump limit everytime
lmao

I'm 99% sure he is. The opinions he has about the Souls series is one only an autistic person could hold.

He will fall, they all eventually do.

I'm pretty sure he doesn't like Mario 64 so the lack of a hub wouldnt bother him. He's one of dem linear fags. I think his order of best marios was like
Galaxy>3D WorldD Land>64>Odyssey>Sunshine

This is what made me not even able to finish hbomberguy's DS2 video, I can't stand people who laugh at their own criticisms and constantly self-deprecate to get away with pretending that anything stupid they say is "just being ironic lol."

>Hes ugly
>But he's got a nice voice

Its all you need.

Mandalore, gggmanlives, and Ross' Game Dungeon are the best ones.

Mandalore is the only person who has made Joseph so angry that he started screaming on his stream. It was honestly stressful to hear someone soft spoken like him suddenly turn so vicious just hearing a name mentioned.

desu he lives in potato land, notorious for shit internet and lazy people