Are you okay with this, Sup Forums?

Are you okay with this, Sup Forums?

>"It’s a fair question that gets a fair response (“Yes.”) For years gamers have wanted their medium to be taken seriously; to be seen as legitimate adult pastimes and not just the playthings of the young or maladjusted; to be considered art. We can’t suddenly get squeamish the moment they start tackling mature themes. And yet."

>"And yet. While I don’t take issue with this content being in the game - in any game - there has to be a reason for it. There has to be a compelling narrative reasons for it to be there. For the player to experience it. Reasons that go beyond gratification or, worse, titillation. And for all I know there might well be - Cage certainly implies there are in his robust defence - but, sitting in this room with its expensive furniture and a dozen other journalists flown in from all corners of the globe at great expense to write previews intended to eventually sell copies of this game, I don’t know for sure. And that, I think, is what my f**king problem is.

>"“F**king bitch took off without a word. F**king whore walked out on me for a f**king accountant!” Todd flies up, throwing the table clean over, sending cutlery and plates flying in all directions, the full force of his fury now aimed directly at the young girl in front of him."

telegraph.co.uk/gaming/features/detroit-become-humans-domestic-abuse-scene-shocking-grim-unknowable/

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tevkM-vPqLY
youtube.com/watch?v=O_AkU8wJ1ZA
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Serbian_Film#Censorship
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>detroit: become human
is it about whites returning to detroit?

Yeah. There's way way WAY worse shit in movies and nobody says anything about it.

Its a slavery metaphor.

I'm fine with it because movies already show worse and I'm also not a fucking idiot who tries to censor things that hurt my feefees in fiction.

It's not real.
People are getting upset at pixels on a screen?

Tons of games do this. Weird marketing, sony

>what the fuck videogames why don't you deal with the REAL social problems?!?!?
>w-woah there videogames what are you doing I m-meant things like my feminine penis and women with blue hair what are you doing?!!?!?

Serbian Film had newborn rape scene and everyone was like "dude lmao, so edgy" and that was it.

>People are getting upset at pixels on a screen?
People are always getting upset at trivial things that don't matter.

Majority of people who complain about things like this don't even play video games, so devs should stop pandering to and audience that literally doesn't exist

"For years gamers have wanted their medium to be taken seriously; to be seen as legitimate adult pastimes and not just the playthings of the young or maladjusted; to be considered art."

Which of you do I blame for this?

I'll laugh if cage will actually respond to this and remove these scenes

>detroit
>white people

>talking about a "game" that's going to be shit
And nothing of value was lost, gained, or transferred

>people
They're robots.

>David Cage
Fucker should have really stuck to film, or childrens pop-up story books.

the first hour of wolf tnc features bj being abused by his dad repeatedly in flashbacks, why didn't that have a controversy?
oh wait, because sony is paying to drum up interest in their otherwise boring game

>movie features domestic violence or other graphic content
>rate the movie R and mention the graphic stuff in reviews just so people know it's there
>no big deal, everyone moves on

>video game features domestic violence or other graphic content
>demand that the creator explain the exact reason it's justified and require that he spoil the whole game to explain it just because you can't accept this without there being a DAMN GOOD REASON for it
>it's a huge deal, we need to ban this sick filth

Fucking WHY?

Me, it's all me, I'm so sorry.

In fiction literally everything is allowed.
If they want to gore her on screen for shock value let them do it, nobody gets harmed.
They should start locking up people who can't tell the difference between fiction and reality into insane asylums though, these subhumans even have the nerve to project their mental illness onto sane people.

If you want video games to be treated as art then you have to let developers do shit like this without breathing down their necks at the first sign of something offensive.

Now, David Cage is a fucking hack, and he won't be able to pull it off, but he should be allowed to attempt it.

you know normies and newspapers would flip their shit about a serbian film right
thats not really a popcorn movie

But Detroit is a movie

>you know normies and newspapers would flip their shit about a serbian film right
Nope, they won't because they will just say "well, there is a +18 rating on it so everything is ok. also, muh art direction"

There are plenty of movies that depict domestic violence against women and children. They get rated R and sometimes people tell other people not to go see them. No one tries to demand the director publicly explain himself or change his movie, they just say, "Don't see the movie if you don't want to see scenes of domestic violence."

The reaction should be the fucking same. Rate the game M and inform people of the content and fucking move on.

>They should start teaching people the difference between fiction and reality

FTFY
Locking people up doesn't solve an issue. Teaching people why a thing is bad should be the goal, and ultimately, I think that's what the scope of Detroit: Become Human was (at some point) suppose to be; a game about the horrors of abuse.

I am not okay with David Cage making more "games".

>For years gamers have wanted their medium to be taken seriously

by who? who gives a shit? who are these people?

>YOU CAN'T DEPICT BAD THINGS

OH NOES A VIDEO GAME CHARACTER GOT HURT IM LITERALLY SHAKING

I don't care what the game wants or doesn't want to show, good for them.
I am kinda peeved by that first paragraph though. There are people who want these themes and artistic quality, but not everyone.
There isn't a single video games community rather than a multitude of them, each with different things that make a game good or bad, and I wish that was acknowledged, instead of pushing a narrative like 'gamers want the medium to be art, why would there be cries against this'.

>People make fun of vidya because it doesn't tackle important or risky themes like literature and TV does
>Developers start tackling these themes
>GAMING IS RACIST ABUSIVE EVIL CORRUPTING OUR YOUTH

yes because its a fucking video game. these worthless liberal cunts are silent when its killing, murder, infecting people in games but wooooOOOOOOOOooowwww boo fucking hoo they show something in a game that expresses how fucked up a situation is in the story they cut themselves and cry to the suicide hotline and demand the shit be removed. its the same fucking situation with the Paz torture in Metal Gear. Pieces of shit whining she was being tortured for being a fucking spy but said NOTHING about Chico having fucking bolts in his goddamn ankles or the whole goddamn game of assassination

I would like video games to be seen as legitimate as movies and TV, if for no other reason than for media outlets to shut the fuck up about stuff like this. If a movie or TV show has graphic content it's just part of the art. If a video game does the same thing it's a horrible outrage. It's an obnoxious double-standard.

But most of the "we need games to be seen as art" crowd think that means games need to be censored in certain ways. I think it means game developers need to not be afraid to just say, "This content is part of our artistic vision, so shove it and don't try to censor us" just like movie directors do.

...

>there are people in this world who don't differentiate between robots made to look like children/women and actual children and women
>yfw you, or at least your children, will see ROBOT LIVES MATTER protests and riots in their lifetimes
Can't wait to beat up robosexuals on the streets.

Does he molest her? Because a kid being beaten isn't anything new in a game.

youtube.com/watch?v=tevkM-vPqLY

Why is this the first thing I thought of?

Before people start getting all riled up, the article is by no means against the game for doing this if you people took the time to read it.

It’s more so just looking at something that hasn’t really been done before in games and asking “is it doing it well?”.

>"“F**king bitch took off without a word. F**king whore walked out on me for a f**king accountant!” Todd flies up, throwing the table clean over, sending cutlery and plates flying in all directions, the full force of his fury now aimed directly at the young girl in front of him."

TODD NO

This article is fair. It concludes that it isn't really possible to judge it without the context of the rest of the game, but points out that it has to be handled well and isn't an acceptable thing to include simply for shock factor. I'm not sure whether that 100% matches my own viewpoint but it's a reasonable one.

They're allowed to include things like this in their game, and others are allowed to criticise them for it. Nobody is talking about banning this game, as far as I can see, they just don't necessarily like it. I see no problem here.

Not sure whether I'll play this game. I don't take offence easily so the scene described is not likely to affect my decision.

Who the actual fuck cares about stories in video games?
What the journalist should be asking is "does it play well?" and shove the story up his ass.

Strongly disagree. The merger of narrative and interactivity is the main reason why I play games now.

It’s a heavily story based game dude. The success of the game is going to be based on how good the story is.

It's doomed. Cage should just make movies like he wants. Same with Kojima.

I don’t know if they even said that they didn’t like it. Seemed like a neutral opinion to me.

Yes.

So what you're saying is, it's shit by default.
Combine that with Cage, and you're in double shit territory.

>"“F**king bitch took off without a word. F**king whore walked out on me to climb a f**king mountain!” Todd flies up, throwing the table clean over, sending sweet rolls and skooma flying in all directions, the full force of his fury now aimed directly at the young Khajit girl in front of him."

I'm sure if you think hard and dark enough, you can come up with something that you don't think should ever be in a video game. Something you wouldn't want to see. I certainly can, but I won't describe it here. We'll call this your line. Your line might be a bit wobbly, and it might either be the same for all media or be different for films vs books vs games, for example.

Whenever a question like this comes up, it's a case of wondering whether the content crosses (or comes close to) their personal line. Everyone has a different one. This Becoming Human scene doesn't cross my line but I can see why it might get very close to some people's (especially if they're parents).

Now wait for the internet tough guys to roll by.

the execution of that same joke was so much worse in the latest episode

Why do they even care? Do they play video games?

>simply for shock factor
This is reasonable.

The girl being choked is a robot. The dad and the kid aren't

Did you read the post?
The writer is someone reviewing the game.

INTERACTIVE movie, please.

>Video Game
Don't you mean Cinematic Experience™?

>it's okay when movies do it, but not when movie-games do it

Also, I couldn't care less because fuck David Cage.

>Child abuse advert that played in the UK for years
>Kid playing Tony Hawks
>Little Timmy is always walking into things...
>A table...
>A door...
>A FIST

...

Absolutely, my post is just my viewpoint. I think it's a fairly reasonable one, I think it's one worth consideration by others, and I'm prepared to defend it.

>.uk
I'm not a bong so I'm fine not reading it regardless

>reviewing
>the game

so no then.

It promotes and normalizes abuse.

First world problems

There's zero controversy here. Especially not when you had mgsv depicting child soldiers, or call of duty show a child being blown up.
Tell me when they depict a rape in a game on the level of Irreversible. Until then the medium is still in its infancy and just going "us too!"

>For years gamers have wanted their medium to be taken seriously; to be seen as legitimate adult pastimes and not just the playthings of the young or maladjusted; to be considered art.

Nope. This only happened after enemployed english majors started feeling self-conscious about their hobby and started abusing critical theory to justify themselves.

The problem here is implying that every piece of art or entertainment has to be aimed at you, catered towards you or even please you. People are allowed to make stuff you have no interest in.

>the post
>the article
user, you aren't a bong, just stupid as fuck.
>play a game that hasn't even been released or hit beta yet
The idiocy swells.

>uk
>first world

No, the industry needs to go through these growing pains. Once we get all this out of the way then hopefully these "journalists" and people who hate the medium will go back to doing whatever it is they were before, then maybe the medium will finally start to settle down. Games will stop being so cinematic and tryhard all the time, won't take 10 years in development anymore or cost a billion dollars and be up to the brim with first day DLC and microtransaction, and will go back to being about innovation and fun again. I'm sick of every publisher being so greedy these days.

see

If you don't think UK is first world try living on South Africa, Zimbabwe, Brazil or Venezuela.

No they're not.

Domestic violence exists whether games show it or not. What is the complain here?

at least in those country you can buy knives to defend yourself and the police doesn't just look and wait to count the bodies when one maniac start to slice people's throat in the street in the name of the religion of peas.

These threads are so boring.

Nigger, it's easier than ever for people to finance, develop, and distrubate a game than ever before, and after 50 or so years since games started, there's more variety than ever before. There are no "growing pains" left.

I'm okay with letting people put what they want in their games.

Funnily enough buying knives won't do shit in these countries because they come at you in bands using assault rifles.

>Journos full of shit
I don't get it, what should I not be ok with? Is the journo somehow afraid that he has to wait for the game to come out and then *shock* PLAY IT TO KNOW FUCKING WHY?
What the fuck

Books and movies shows this sort of shit all the time.

whites are flocking to detroit for that bbc, they even sort of have public transport now.

youtube.com/watch?v=O_AkU8wJ1ZA
Detroit: Become Cyborg

Who cares

>newborn rape scene

It isn't as good as you think.

>GAMING """""""""JOURNALISTS"""""""""

I was just shitposting, but i can't imagine it's pretty shitty.

No, you retarded fucking clown.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Serbian_Film#Censorship

They didn't care when Pokemon had child abuse

>child abuse is not real

is that a robophobic remark?!

Imagine if a video game had the same scene and tell me how the media will react. I bet my left nut that it will be much more than just "censorship".

>imagine being an amerimutt and get triggered over pixels in your screen

Well PRESS X TO RAPE BABY is worse than watching someone rape a baby

WOW YOU BIGOT ARE YOU NORMALIZING AND PROMOTING CHILD ABUSE? I BET YOU'RE A GAMERGATER AND VOTED FOR DRUMPF TOO

whats the purpose of your painfully obvious falseflaging?