VIDYA OPERATION

Oh no, doctor! There are so many cancers killing video games, but we only have time to operate on one!

What is the worst cancer killing video games that needs to be removed right away?

Jews

Where's Sup Forums?

None of those things come close to comparing to micro transactions.

All of those except JRPGs are a direct effect of casuals taking over video games. Remove casuals and vidya goes back to being niche and all the other cancers die out.

And why are micro transactions a thing? Why were they allowed to become a standard?

I don't understand why JRPGs are there. Generally it's a genre played by gaming enthusiasts.

Forgot to add forced diversity quotas / sjw agendas

Because you retards go "they aren't in my games! Get better taste!!!!"

Removing Casuals would also get rid of about half of those

Streamers and youtubers too. All the e-celebs in fact.

It would also crash the industry since it's become so dependent upon them.

put whales on here
whales final answer

microtransactions could be a relatively harmless alternative to DLC/expansions in multiplayer games if you didn't have insane rich people spending 3,000 dollars on hats because they don't play any other games

Bingo. Nobody wants to admit that if gamers as an aggregate made better financial choices, our industry would either clean itself up over night, or crash itself again trying to get our money. Either way, things would probably pick up for us.

>they have more money then me
>that means they're ruining gaming
>ignore all the real problems

user, you gotta let it go, bruv.

i'm pretty sure there's been backlash against that, saying that either "what we buy doesn't matter because there are WHALES that will buy either way!" or "they're manipulating children/gambling addicts with pretty colors and fun sounds!" and stuff like that

Valve

fpbp

Online only games should be on there

online only games are a symptom of people being insane with microtransactions.

Portal 2 was a failure to valve because people didn't buy microtransactions for a game they wouldn't continue to play after the campaign. EA said they shut down visceral because people "don't want to play singleplayer only games as much as they used to" which is both honestly probably true and financially sensible looking at the profit.

>Implying that a crash isn't exactly what the market needs

Definitely casuals, a lot of the other problems would be fixed or lessened if casuals were removed.

do you have a plan aside from "NUKE IT AND START OVER"

what is there to guarantee that it turns out better the second time
>NOTHING CAN BE WORSE THAN WHAT WE-
shhhh it can always get worse, literally always