I've heard people say that Twilight Princess might be even better than Ocarina if you look at them as two completely two seperate games but it people dislike it since as a sequel it does bring much new to the table. So I'm wondering in that case if I don't have the sentiment towards the series it would be a good idea to start with it?
I've heard people say that Twilight Princess might be even better than Ocarina if you look at them as two completely...
Other urls found in this thread:
> Hyrule field is boring and too large and empty
> Items become useless after their dungeon
> Herding and stopping goats in the village
> A tutorial section that lasts way too long
It's only redeeming factor is the only semi decent water temple LoZ has ever seen
I like Twilight Princess because of Midna's ass.
why did they make midna so hot?
Twilight Princess was my first Zelda and now it's my favourite franchise, so sure.
You'll never get an honest opinion on Twilight Princess because you spend 40% of the game looking at Midna's plot and backstory.
OoT and TP are neck-&-neck but since Midna pleases my dick more than any other Vidya character TP edges OoT out.
MM is better still though.
I loved it, but I find it to be one of the least replayable. Not just because of the cutscenes, either. I just don't care about majority of hyrule after the first run.
And her ass.
The order I think is the most important is playing OoT before MM because MM is a direct sequel to OoT and you get that feeling that Link is already experienced. TP is related to OoT and MM but with the larger time gap it's less important to play in order.