Dumb vidya arguments

Dumb vidya arguments

>You can't have your cake and eat it too

>It's ok this time because it's based nintendo!

>microtransactions are good!

>league takes more skill than dota because [anything]

>if you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding

>caring about opinions on an anonymous image board where anyone smart enough to complete the captcha can post

Thats a dumb argument in life anyways. Why can't I have a cake and eat it? Is the cake made of rocks? It's like those assholes who say "you know what happens when you assume" yeah you get a 50/50 chance of being right or wrong, you fucking retards

WE DON'T NEED NO EDUCATION

>using "fun" when trying to discuss a game's positive aspects objectively

>if you dont like nintendo, you're a sony fanboy and vice versa

im not including xboners because they're almost non-existent

>im not including xboners because they're almost non-existent

pcfag detected

im not dissing the xbox. every console war is between sony and nintendo. xbox never got a hand at it since they're destroying themselves over and over

I want to eat (out) a cake.

Because when you eat the cake its now gone dumbass.

it was a hoke bruh

fug my bad

>It's fun with Friends!!!

...

>it's good b/c it's better than the worst game of the series.

Inb4 I was only pretending to be retarded.

Thats not how inb4 works, faggot

I was only pretending to be retarded

>Dumb vidya arguments

"comfy"

>Game's too "dated" to enjoy today! It only serves to be played as a historical landmark.

>toxic players aren't a problem, just grow thicker skin

>It's bad now that nintendo's doing it! #fortheplayers

faggot detected

>We can't factor in entertainment when judging entertainment

Siege is literally this though
There ARE games built for multiplayer focused experience with your friends
Argument is valid

Depends on the situation, it works if a game that came or after a disaster shows improvement
Argument is valid

Fun is another word for enjoyment user, stop being triggered, yes there are people who shitpost with Fun as the only word
But there are people who are well aware of the mechanics and use the word “Fun” to express their enjoyment
>I’m having fun exploring
Etc
Argument is valid

Microtransactions aren’t good
However it’s absolutely mandatory if said game is free
Otherwise no
Situational valid argument

>Argument is valid

No it isn't, because fun is completely subjective you fucking idiot.

>Works for me c:

>stop being triggered

I R O N Y

I don't think you know the difference between subjectivity and objectivity, like most of Sup Forums.

>Pointing out flaws in an otherwise good game means you hate it

>Gets good X hours in

>entertainment

user, the argument is valid if the person uses it to describe enjoyment for the entertainment while being well aware of the game’s mechanics

Come back when you learn how subjectivity works.

If you're discussing a game's qualities in terms of how well it's made, and how well it controls etc - fun has nothing to do with anything.

Your getting triggered for people saying something is fun

>HURR DURR SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE

There is no objective agreement in a fucking video game because people’s tastes in genre’s are different

It only is objective when discussing balant obvious things like bugs and crashes
Otherwise any discussion about positive enjoyment is subjective
Not everybody likes Ocarina of Time for a reason

i dont understand thread, me brainlet?

that's not an argument it's just a statement
the fact that you feel such a sense of hostility from hearing that word just makes you extremely autistic

>toxic players cause me to lose games, and somehow impact my own gameplay

>slippery slope

The only hostility here is from you.

You're also the only autist here because you've just said it's not an argument which was my point the entire time.

Be less of a triggered soyboy next time.

>There is no objective agreement in a fucking video game

Yes there is you retard. You can say a game's level design or combat system is bad objectively. You can just say GAME'S GOOD BECAUSE IT'S FUN HAHA.

But its in a discussion about the quality of the product..

No it isn't, it's in your stomach dumb ass.
And what happens when you're only half way through your cake? You still have it, and you've eaten it you. I hope your daughter gets raped and killed by a nigger you fucking waste of resources

Look at you, completely lacking any self awareness.
When people say something is comfy do you always throw an autistic shit-fit and go "NOT AN ARGUMENT!!!!1 >:((((" even thought no-one was looking for an argument in the firstplace?
>not an argument
So fucking what, who's arguing? I'm just saying it's comfy.
Goddamn it's like your fucking trigger word.

Using "fun" in an actual argument is pretty retarded. It's right up there with "comfy".

I'm sorry I got so worked up, I apologize.

This thread is about dumb vidya arguments, not statements. Using fun and comfy in ARGUMENTS is retarded. Saying a video game is fun means fuck all to me because fun is completely subjective. Same thing with that retarded comfy buzzword.

>completely lacking any self awareness

oh sweetie..

people never actually use it in an argument they just say it when listing things they like
only time "comfy" appears as an argument is in your little strawman imitations, never in the real world

The cake is gone but what matters is the experience of eating the cake.

"I ate all the cake and i am sad now because there is no cake left" - Retarded child

"Eating all that cake was a pleasurable experience and i am happy i did it" - Real man

This is the stupidest opinion in Sup Forums
Fun is the only relevent factor in if a video game is good or not

>dupe cake exploit
>have a cake
>eat a cake
dummies

I agree but people will never stop this habit.

>People using the word "objectively" as if it somehow makes them right