DayZ is a joke.
DayZ is a joke
Welcome to years ago
DayZ is better than PUBG, though.
i heard they were giving refunds for it, did that ever happen?
even their mobile app is shit
No, Brian Hicks (Creative Lead) contacted Valve to ensure what happened with KF2 and ARK doesn't happen to DayZ.
That's how scared he was. Has someone got the tweet/comment?
Posted this on the leddit.
Removed by mods instantly kek
I'd like to remind you guys that the DLC for ArmA lll costs more than the base game itself now.
You paid sixty dollars for a game that you only have fifty-percent of the content for.
Fuck Bohemia Interactive, I'll never support them again.
can you do me a favor and stay there? You're bringing down posting quality by being here
everyone saw that coming
I still like Arma 2 better anyways
fucking epic bro
go back there and stay there, faggot
gonna post this thread to reddit for upvotes lol
What are you talking about? ArmA 3 has one of the best and fairest DLC-policies ever. Literally 80% of the content is free in order not to divide the community you retard.
But those games actually added shit, without breaking more shit.
I also don't remember KF2 having to remove zeds, or Ark having to remove dinosaurs because their shit borked.
I'm confus to ur statment
I've been out of the loop with DayZ, why did they remove zombies?
Here he is again, the world famous nu-Bohemia shill that loves to suck their greedy dicks for pennies.
ArmA ll never once charged anyone to use weapons, vehicles, terrain or units.
The quality of the content was compressed but still completely usable along with the fact they only released three dlc's for the game.
It's not fair at all, it's forcing players to pay over a hundred dollars on a game to use things that should've been in the base game.
You can't fly certain helicopters, use certain weapons or wear certain uniforms unless you pay up like the dairy cow they treat you for.
he has no clue what he is talking about.
Zombies are in-game since like 1,5 years and the game is literally more bug-free than PUBG, lmfao.
Casuals just can't handle the permadeath, but for me it's the most interesting aspect because you will NEVER ever experience intensity and adrenaline like you do in DayZ
>ArmA ll never once charged anyone to use weapons, vehicles, terrain or units.
ArmA 3 is a vastly bigger and more complex game than ArmA 2, has received more patch support, more content and more technology additions than ArmA 2 and ArmA 3 (vanilla) has FAR more content than ArmA 2 (vanilla)
i don't get your arguments
Do you think they could should support the game for free, for 5+ years? Thats delusional nigger
A couple of years ago my buddy pushed me to get back into it. Swearing up and down it was more functional than ever.
Except at the time, they'd removed zombies from the game because some new behavior the added was (hope you're sitting down) fucking shit up.
I just lol'd and never looked back.
Once the game attracted the KoS 360noscope faggot culture to it, the game stopped being fun. Spawning in and getting headshot by some faggot in top tier equipment, then shouting his twitch account over voice chat isn't fun
I don't disagree with you at all.
What's your point?
you need to play on 1st person servers
KoS is pretty rare these days, honestly.
Also not having the possibility of getting KOSd makes the game boring. It's all about that.
I'd rather have no support at all, DLC is aids
Valve doesnt gove refunds when games leave EA after ARK devs complained.
You couldnt even refund pubg if you bought it over two weeks before launch but never played it.
Expect dayz to release now they wont lose money.
Fuck, now I've gotta watch Hot Fuzz again.
Arma 3 was on my wist list for years and years. It's was going to be my first Arma game, everyone said that they aren't good without mods and expacs are practically mandatory since some mods don't work without them, so I just kept waiting for the price to go down to $30 or less. Then once it did, over two years later, there was so much xpac price gouging bullshit that I just didn't bother, cause I would have to spend over $80 for the complete game.
It really isn't user, ArmA 2 had more terrain, vehicles, factions, weapons and units.
The only thing ArmA 3 did differently is have some nice mechanics like being able to shoot out of vehicles and having functional mirrors along with the new ballistics system which is good.
It still doesn't justify adding in new content and putting a price tag on them.
I could understand if Bohemia maybe put in say, three DLCs that had a lot of content (think on the scale of apex) - but this trend of mini-dlcs is autistic.
user, I'd highly recommend you check out the Arma X: Anniversary Edition. It's ten bucks right now.
The in-game editor will give you hundreds of hours of fun without having to shell out over a hundred bucks.
I'm so sorry you had to join the party when nu-Bohemia took over with their greedy ways.
I've been playing ArmA since 2001 and this is the first time I've felt so angry at how Bohemia has been milking their loyal community.
ArmA 2 may not have an active multiplayer anymore but the in-game editor alone is worth buying it for.
You can make gigantic battles of AI and download some really neat mods that make the game even better.
>game is more bug free than PUBG
>zombies can still walk through walls
Good one.
whats a good way to make cool battles?
I remember just making squads and giving them pointers to where to go but with the shitty AI that they have where they never look for cover it became kinda boring
>zombies can still walk through walls
no? When was the last time you played the game, idiot?
>what is ballistics
>what is actual physics interaction between objects
>what are graphics
>what is underwater environment
etc. etc.
you sound dumb if you try to refute ArmA 3 being a more complex game than ArmA 2.
Also ArmA 2 didn't have more terrain, both maps in ArmA 2 vanilla are smaller than Altis and Stratos dude.
Please don't waste your time in the editor doing dumb shit like AI battles, find a group to play with and get the mods, you'll have a lot more fun than literally watching ai kill each other.
Then waste your time in the editor making missions for your group to play
The other day.
Try to make up a scenario in your head, I like to do missions where I have a number of AI in a large town holding off against another large force.
Static emplacements, tanks, helicopters, reinforcements, etc.
Lot's of easy to use scripts and tons of mods with different styles (vietnam, ww2, cold war, etc)
One thing you definitely would like is nic's arma 2 camera script. It'll let you view the battle as a free-floating camera. I have like 500 hours in ArmA 2 purely in the editor.
I'm not saying ArmA 2 in every way is better but in most areas yes. The ballistics system is really nice, I'll give A3 that.
The physics interaction is a tiny quality-of-life improvement that doesn't make much of a difference.
ArmA ll's graphics were way better and more realistic looking, try looking at a arma 3 face compared to arma 2.
You know for a fact that the underwater shit was barebones and is untouched by everybody.
Also, ArmA 2 had Chernarus, Utes, Takistan, Zarbajfgjsdgjsdgad, the two czech maps along with the PMC and British maps.
Plus you could play all of those maps without having to own the three dlc's.
actually this