Do you agree?

Do you agree?

The Galaxy games are severely overrated. Both of them bored me so much I didn't even finish either

Dunkey is objectively correct on all matters Vidya related.

The "New" series was only fun once in the DS as a novelty but are largely mediocre and lazy. The 3D series felt more like "New Super Mario Bros." then anything.

Also World is way better then 3.

Move Galaxy 1 and 2 and Odyssey down to tier 3 and it's fine.

Dunkey is kind of plebby.

Galaxy doesn't deserve the same prestige as 64 or SMB3. Hell, I'd say Sunshine is better than them.

3D Land and World being on the same tier annoys me.

Mario 64 has no right to be on the very top.
2nd banana sure, but not the top

Elaborate.

Wheres Super Mario Bros 2?

...

>New Super Mario Bros.
>New Super Mario Bros. 2
>New Super Mario Bros. Wii
>New Super Mario Bros. U
>Super Mario 3D Land
>Super Mario 3D World

I can't even remember which of these I have

I'd put multiple of those games under "bad"

Mario Maker got cut off the pic at the top, right?

All "New" games and 3D Land/World are fucking trash, Super Mario Land/2 are 10x the games they'll ever be.

dude nah.
change Super Mario World with Odyssey.
and where da fuck is paper mario?

this

wrong image

I know I own them all but I feel the same way about them. All of them are extremely forgettable games, blows my mind that people mention them in the same breath as the mainline Mario games and in some cases rank them higher.

Why exactly do people like galaxy so much? honest question, they are fine games but they are super easy, even for a mario game, and barely any of the levels are memorable at all.

Sunshine definitely is.
So is SMW

Mario Maker is worse than romhacks.

Swap Sunshine with Galaxy 2

...

>Mario 64, Mario Oddyssey and Mario Galaxy above SMW and Yoshi Island

Just and underage could have that taste.

Paper Mario isn't a platformer

Super Paper Mario is

Mario 64 is tremendously overrated. It's not shit or anything but it was never great and it has aged very poorly.

No because Sunshine is the best one. Or just behind Odyssey.

switch odysee with sunshine

>barely any of the levels are memorable at all.

That's like saying a novel is not memorable because you can't remember every single page. The only reason you even remember every level of Mario 64 is because it's a kid's book with 10 pages.

Odyssey
Sunshine
World
3D World
Galaxy 1+2
64
NSMBU
3
2
1
3D Land
NSMB 1 wii phone ds book movie 2 3ds switch snes nes

nope, we need a SHIT and mediocre section

That very well may be the worst comparison I've ever heard. It is nothing like not remembering every single page, it's more like not really remembering the events and the places the characters went through, or simply just not remembering the chapters. I can remember literally 0 of the levels from galaxy 2 right now off the top of my head, and only a couple from 1 despite 100%ing both games.
And you didn't actually answer my question as to what makes galaxy specifically great in any way, it's fine and competent but very forgettable unlike almost every other mainline 3d mario game.
Fuck off retard.

ITT Sup Forums being contrarian as usual

to this day I never got the appeal of SM Land other than the bretty gud soundtrack

Which would you rate above the other?

I agree, but unlike the other games, I didn't play it until a decade or more after it came out. I wonder if I were judging it as a product of its time, instead of basing it on modern standards, I would have enjoyed it more.

hi sonyfriend, there's no such thing as a bad mario game

Where the fuck is Doki Mario 2